Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06201468

Frozen Shoulder (Scapular Mobilization Versus Scapular PNF)

This study will be conducted to examine and compare the effects of SM versus SPNF on shoulder pain, ROM and functional disabilities in patients with frozen shoulder.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cairo University

Cairo, 02, Egypt

About this study

This study will be conducted to examine and compare the effects of SM versus SPNF on shoulder pain, ROM and functional disabilities in patients with frozen shoulder.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All the patients refferd from orthopaedic surgeon with diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis. Patients will be included in this study if they fulfil the following criteria
  • Case diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis, both primary and secondary.
  • Both males and females of the age group 40 to 60 years.
  • Limited active and passive movement of the shoulder joint movements, as well as difficulties with ADLs.

4- The onset of symptoms between 3 to 12 months. 5. Unilateral adhesive capsulitis.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. History of shoulder surgery or manipulation under anaesthesia, local corticosteroid injection administration to the affected shoulder within the last 6 months, 2. Neurological deficit affecting the shoulder function during daily activities, 3. Pathology of the shoulder joint other than adhesive capsulitis including rotator cuff tear, tendonitis at the shoulder and neck region, malignancies, history of trauma or accidental injuries of the upper limb.

4- Other pathological conditions including, a history of stroke, history of mastectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

  • Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, or disorders of the cervical spine, elbow, wrist or hand.

Treatment and study plan

Group A SCAPULAR MOBILIZATION

Other

Two treatment groups will receive interventions as follows:

Group A (n = 21): will receive scapular mobilization combined with mobilization with movement (MWM) and capsular stretch for 4 weeks.

Group B (n = 21): will receive scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with (MWM) and capsular stretch for 4 weeks.

Other names: GROUP B SCAPULAR PNF

Primary outcomes

  1. Shoulder disability

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)

    The translated version of SPADI in the Arabic language showed excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity was shown by substantial correlations between SPADI and Quick DASH, NRS, and active shoulder ROM. The Arabic SPADI is recommended for the evaluation of patients with shoulder dysfunction

  2. Shoulder range of motion

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    A goniometer is a device used to measure the range of motion (in degrees) of joints for either active or passive range. Shoulder flexion, extension, abduction adduction, internal rotation and external rotation will be assessed by Goniometer

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scapular upward rotation

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Plurimeter-V gravity inclinometer will be used effectively and reliably for measuring upward rotation of the scapula in all ranges of shoulder abduction in the coronal plane

  2. Lateral scapular slide test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The three test positions will be used. For test position one (LSST-1), the subjects were instructed to keep their upper extremities relaxed at their sides. For test position two (LSST-2), the subjects were instructed to actively place both hands on the ipsilateral hips, and consequently, the humerus was positioned in medial rotation at 45° of abduction in the coronal plane. For test position three (LSST-3), the subjects were instructed to actively extend both elbows and to elevate both upper extremities to 90° in the coronal plane with maximal internal rotation. In this procedure, the distance between inferior aspect of the inferior angle of the scapula and the closest spinous process in the same horizontal plane was measured bilaterally with a tape measure for all three positions. A difference of 1.5 cm or more in any of the three positions was considered a positive result of the LSST

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

SCAPULAR MOBILIZATION VERSUS SCAPULAR PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEURO MUSCULAR FACILITATION ON FROZEN SHOUDER

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 11, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.