Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04673604

From Preserved, to Preservative-free Cyclosporine 0.1% Enhanced Triple Glaucoma Therapy

There is a lack of evidence on the impact of switching from a combined preserved anti-glaucoma regimen to a preservative-free (PF) one, while employing sufficiently robust OSD metrics. The investigators have therefore carried out a single center, prospective, crossover investigation to compare the 6-month effect of switching well controlled open-angle glaucoma patients with at least moderate glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease from preserved to triple preservative-free therapy with and without cyclosporine 0.1% dosed in the evening.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Department of Ophthalmology

Thessaloniki, 55536, Greece

About this study

Halting and reversing glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease (GTR-OSD) will improve the success of long-term medical therapy, impacting millions of patients worldwide. Chronic medical therapy for glaucoma may be immensely benefitted by limiting disabling GTR-OSD, which would aid in the prevention of blindness. In 2015 a novel cationic formulation of cyclosporine A 0.1% was approved with once in the evening dosing in Europe. It is an effective, targeted immunomodulatory compound reducing inflammatory mediators and providing healing of the ocular epithelium. There remains however a paucity of published controlled evidence for GTR-OSD patients treated with this formulation. In addition, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of switching from a combined preserved anti-glaucoma regimen, to a preservative-free one, while employing sufficiently robust OSD metrics. The investigators have therefore carried out a single center prospective, crossover investigation to compare the 6-month effect of switching well controlled open-angle glaucoma patients with at least moderate GTR-OSD, from preserved to triple PF therapy with and without PF cyclosporine 0.1% dosed in the evening.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with well controlled open-angle glaucoma
  • Patients chronically treated for more than 6 months with preserved, branded, or generic, triple antiglaucoma therapy comprising latanoprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination
  • Subjects should have experienced at least 1 symptom of dry eye (soreness, scratchiness, dryness, grittiness, and burning)
  • Additionally, patients should demonstrate at least one of the objective signs for OSD at baseline: positive conjunctival staining with lissamine green and/or evidence of positive corneal staining with fluorescein (assessed with the 15-point Oxford scale),
  • Patients must show a BUT<8 seconds
  • On screening patients should show a Schirmer test without anesthesia (Schirmer-I test) ≥3 and ≤10 mm in 5 minutes.
  • When both eyes qualify the worse eye will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Best corrected visual acuity <1/10
  • Patients with severe dry eye disease or Sjogren's disease
  • Presence of eyelid abnormality, corneal disorder or abnormality, ocular surface metaplasia, filamentous keratitis, or corneal neovascularization
  • Patients who have undergone ocular surgery (of any type, including laser surgery), or ocular trauma within 4 months prior to screening
  • Subjects who had punctal occlusion, or diathermy within 3 months prior to screening or abnormality of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus.
  • Known allergy, or sensitivity to any of the study medications
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease, or history or active signs of ocular trauma, infection, inflammation, allergic disease, or herpes; corneal ulcers; recurrent erosions; or uveitis
  • Female patients will be excluded if they are pregnant, breastfeeding, planning a pregnancy, or are unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception.

Treatment and study plan

Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale)

Diagnostic Test

Corneal and conjunctiva staining will be recorded according to the Oxford grading scheme for ocular staining (0-15 score).

mean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering

Drug

At the end of each 6-month period patients will undergo diurnal intraocular pressure assessment with both therapies.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change from baseline in ocular staining (Oxford score)

    Time frame: 6 months

    The primary efficacy endpoint for this crossover study will be the mean change from baseline in the total ocular staining score as determined by the 15-point Oxford scale of staining on the study eye.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean diurnal IOP

    Time frame: 6 months

    Mean diurnal intraocular pressure with the two preservative-free therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.

  2. Osmolarity

    Time frame: 6-months

    Mean tear osmolarity with the two PF therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.

  3. Matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) over-expression

    Time frame: 6 months

    Mean MMP-9 over-expression with the two PF therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Changing From Preserved, to Preservative-free Cyclosporine 0.1% Enhanced Triple Glaucoma Therapy: Impact on the Rate and Severity of Ocular Surface Disease

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Dec 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 20, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.