Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01031394

Frequency of Aerobic/Resistance Training in Older Women

The objective of this study is to provide insight into the effects combined training frequency has on improving fitness, ease of physical activity, and maintenance of a high total energy expenditure. Such information is critical to our understanding of ways to improve well-being, quality of life, and independence of an aging population. 105 participants will be enrolled in this study. The length of time for your involvement in the study will be 32 weeks. You will undergo the procedures listed in this consent form on 3 separate occasions-initially at your entry, at 16 weeks and again at 32 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UAB

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

About this study

Frequency of aerobic/resistance training in older women

Abstract Combined aerobic and resistance training have unique benefits for maintaining a physical activity (PA). However, the optimal training program for combining these two modes of training in older adults is unknown. This study builds on current and past studies showing that training induced gains in aerobic fitness, muscle strength, and ease of PA are important for maintaining an active lifestyle, a favorable body composition, and high bone density. Traditionally 3 d/wk combined training has been felt to be optimal while recent studies suggest 1 d/wk combined training may create similar adaptations as more frequent training. However, our previous and ongoing studies suggest that 1 d/wk combined aerobic and resistance training (C1) may be insufficient stimulus to induce optimal adaptations and that 3 d/wk combined training (C3) may be too frequent a stimulus for older adults. This study will enable us to compare the effects of C1, 2 d/wk combined training (C2), and C3 on fitness, body composition, ease of PA, PA, and total free-living energy expenditure (TEE). We hypothesize that C2 will result in a larger increase in muscle size, bone density, strength, aerobic capacity, power, ease of PA, PA, and TEE than either C1 or C3. Circulating cytokines and psychological mood states linked to chronic overstress will also be examined. Objectives: We will examine changes in circulating cytokines, mood states, muscle size, bone density, aerobic capacity, strength, power, ease of PA, PA, and TEE following 16 and 32 wks training. Design: We will to evaluate 78 (>60 yrs) Black and White women matched for age, race, and BMI into C1, C2, or C3 groups prior to, after 16, and after 32 wks training. Women will undergo evaluation of metabolic parameters in a General Clinical Research Center. Significance: This study should provide insight into the effects combined training frequency has on improving fitness, ease of PA, and maintenance of a high TEE. Such information is critical to our understanding of ways to improve well being, quality of life, and independence of an aging population.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

,

  • healthy women over 60 years of age,
  • Caucasian or African-American.

Exclusion criteria

  • smoking,
  • diabetes,
  • osteoporosis,
  • inability to coperform weight bearing exercises, currently performing to much exercise.

Treatment and study plan

Frequency of Aerobic/Resistance Training - 3 to 3

Other

comparing group results based upon frequency of exercise

Other names: freqency of aerobic and resistance training

Primary outcomes

  1. Use a repeated measures analysis to compare differences in TEE and other parameters among the 3 intervention groups across time

    Time frame: over 32 weeks of training

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Acronym: SWEET

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Dec 14, 2009
Registry last updated
Oct 27, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.