McMaster University - St. Peter's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8M1W9, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT03824106
Frailty is an important clinical state that contributes to falls, hospitalization, institutionalization and death. When an individual simultaneously has many health problems, a frailty "tipping point" may be triggered by even a minor stressful event such as adding a new drug or urinary tract infection. Our research suggests that approximately 23% of Canadians over age 65 are frail, and by age 85 this estimate increases to over 40%. As we learn more about frailty and its consequences, there is an urgent need to develop community-based interventions that will prevent or delay frailty in older adults. Our proposed study will examine if frailty rehabilitation program is an effective community-based intervention to promote healthy aging. The primary objective of our study is to determine if 4-month frailty rehabilitation improves physical function compared with control and exercise alone in community-dwelling older adults living with frailty and sarcopenia. Secondary objectives of our study are to determine if 4-months of frailty rehabilitation can improve functional abilities and reduce healthcare utilization during a 6-month follow-up period compared with control and exercise alone. Results will translate the first Canadian model of frailty and sarcopenia rehabilitation and management.
Interested in participating?
Request Info65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hamilton, Ontario, L8M1W9, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
In this multi-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), 324 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65+) with frailty and at high risk for mobility disability will be randomized into one of three arms (control, exercise only, multi-modal rehabilitation) stratified by sex, age and location preference. Rolling recruitment will occur with ten cohorts total (2-3 cohorts per site, n=33 participants per cohort), enrolled across the partner Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) sites.
Building upon the RCT, we aim to understand which components of a functional rehabilitation program are essential to change the trajectory of sarcopenia in older adults and explore the feasibility of a functional rehabilitation program with older adults. All participants will be screened for sarcopenia at baseline. Of the 324 participants, a subset of participants with sarcopenia will undergo additional assessments.
A validated frailty questionnaire can be administered over the phone and will provide an estimate of frailty status.
Stratified block randomization (1:1 randomization ratio) with the allocation sequence generated by a computer will be used to randomly allocate eligible participants to their group assignment. Participants will be stratified based on their sex, age (<80 or >=80 years), and location preference. To protect against selection bias, the randomization sequence will be adequately concealed so that investigators/participants are not aware of the upcoming assignment. The proposed duration of treatment is 4-months.
Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at 0 and 4-months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants randomized to the control arm will not receive any of the Frailty Management Interventions.
A recent meta-analysis suggests 180 min/week of exercise (with a high challenge to balance) is most effective for fall prevention. Combined strength and endurance training performed at a moderate weekly frequency (i.e., two times per week) may promote marked gains on muscle hypertrophy, strength and power gains in frail older adults. Balance training is a key component of successful exercise programs for vulnerable older adults.
Nutrition review: Conduct nutritional screening flow and review any questions, provide some additional counseling/coaching. Protein supplements will be provided to all participants unless contraindicated.
Medication review: Review/update current medication list and forward the list and medical history to the consultant study pharmacist.
Protein supplementation will be provided.
1000 IU of oral vitamin D
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Physical function will be assessed with the Short Performance Physical Battery [total score]. Higher scores indicate better physical performance [range 0-12].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Walking speed will be assessed with the 400-m Walk Test [walking speed, m/s]. Faster walking speeds indicate better performance.
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Frailty will be assessed with the Fit-Frailty App [total score]. Higher scores indicate greater frailty [range 0-1].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale [total score]. Higher scores indicate greater fear of falling [range 16-28]
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Dichotomous questions (y/n)
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Number of falls will be assessed by self-report.
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Fitness will be assessed with Fitness Trackers [average step count per day]. A greater number of steps indicates higher fitness level.
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Strength will be assessed with a handgrip dynamometer [kg].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Strength will be assessed with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test [total time]. A higher score indicates a greater falls risk (greater or equal to 12 sec) and lower functional mobility.
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Cognition will be assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [total score]. Higher scores indicate better cognition [range 0-30].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Cognition will be assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination [total score]. Higher scores indicate better cognition [range 0-30].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using a EuroQol instrument. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life [range 0-100].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Life space mobility will be assessed with the Life Space Assessment [total score]. Higher scores indicate a larger life space [range 0-120].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Activities of daily living will be assessed with the Katz activities of daily living questionnaire [total score]. Lower scores indicate greater impairment [range 0-6].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Activities of daily living will be assessed with Lawton instrumental activities of daily living questionnaire [total scores]. Lower scores indicate greater impairment [range 0-8].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Depression and mood will be assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale Short-Form [total score]. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms [range 0-15].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Nutrition will be assessed with the Mini Nutritional Assessment [total score]. Lower scores indicate malnutrition [range 0-14].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Sarcopenia will be assessed with the strength, assistance walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire [total score]. High scores (greater than or equal to 4) is predictive of sarcopenia [range 0-10].
Time frame: Baseline and 4-months
Muscle mass will be assessed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A subset of participants will be assessed.
Time frame: Baseline, 4-months and additional 6-month follow-up
Number of emergency room visits will be recorded. Higher number of emergency room visits indicates higher healthcare utilization.
Time frame: Baseline, 4-months and additional 6-month follow-up
Number of hospitalizations will be recorded. Higher number of hospitalizations indicates higher healthcare utilization.
Time frame: Baseline, 4-months and additional 6-month follow-up
Institutionalization to long-term care will be recorded. Higher number individuals entering long-term care indicates higher healthcare utilization.
Time frame: Baseline, 4-months and additional 6-month follow-up
Individual-level economic evaluations will be assessed by changes in direct medical costs and effectiveness outcomes (e.g., quality-adjusted life years - QALYs), calculate and compare the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (e.g., $/ QALY gained, $/ a visit averted) against a willingness-to-pay threshold ($50,000/QALY) to show if this program of frailty rehabilitation represents good value for money.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
McMaster University
Other
Frailty Rehabilitation: A Community-based Intervention to Promote Healthy Aging
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07727876
Frailty, Neoplasms
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07634406
Frailty, Pathologic Processes
Simav, Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06889545
Atrophy, Frailty
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07709975
Behavior, Confusion
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details