Froedtert Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Ally Vandenberg, BSc
CONTACT
Nikki Johnston, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT04383262
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) is a common condition that causes symptoms like chronic cough, throat clearing, hoarseness, and trouble swallowing. If not treated, LPR can lead to long-term throat damage and may increase the risk of throat cancer. More than 20% of the people in the United States are estimated to have LPR, yet there is no effective medication approved to treat it. Drugs called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often used to treat LPR, even though they were designed for stomach acid problems. These medications reduce acid but do not stop reflux from happening, so they often do not help LPR patients. Despite poor results, PPIs are widely prescribed, are very costly, and can cause side effects.
Research shows that a digestive enzyme called pepsin plays a key role in LPR. Pepsin can damage the throat and voice box even when acid is not present. Laboratory studies found that certain HIV medications can block damage caused by pepsin. People taking these medications for HIV appear to have a much lower rate of LPR. This study will test fosamprenavir, an FDA-approved HIV drug, as a treatment for LPR. We will conduct a 14-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with LPR who did not improve with standard treatment. Participants will receive either fosamprenavir or placebo, randomly, and symptoms will be measured before and after treatment using standard questionnaires and daily symptom tracking.
Because there is no effective medical treatment for LPR. this study aims to test a safe, existing drug that targets the underlying cause of the disease.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Ally Vandenberg, BSc
CONTACT
Nikki Johnston, PhD
CONTACT
Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) causes chronic cough, throat clearing, hoarseness, and dysphagia and if left untreated can promote the development of laryngeal cancer. More than 20% of the United Stated population suffer from LPR, yet there is no effective medical therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which inhibit gastric acid production but do not prevent reflux events, continue to be prescribed for LPR despite their poor efficacy for this patient population, high cost ($26 billion/year), and associated risks. Pepsin, detected in the airway of these patients and now known to cause laryngeal inflammation and promote disease independent of gastric acid, is a key therapeutic target. We report preclinical studies of select HIV inhibitors that bind to and inhibit pepsin and thus hold promise for the treatment of LPR. In support, a very low incidence of LPR was found in patients taking these drugs compared to the general population. HIV inhibitors are ideal drugs to repurpose because they target a foreign virus. Thus, a repurposing approach can be used to safely perform proof of concept testing of the efficacy of a pepsin inhibitor for LPR.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fosamprenavir (FOS), administered orally for improving symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The Specific Aim of this project is to perform a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the efficacy of fosamprenavir pills for LPR. Fosamprenavir will be used at the FDA approved, manufacturers recommended dose for HIV for 12 weeks in medically refractory patients with clinically diagnosed moderate/severe LPR and combined multi-channel intraluminal impedance - pH (MII-pH) confirmed laryngeal reflux events. Routine clinical outcome measures for LPR (Reflux Symptom Index, Reflux Finding Score, Voice Handicap Index) will be documented pre- and post-treatment with Oral Fosamprenavir for LPR (n = 52) and placebo (n = 52). Additional research measures will include repeat administration of a newly created Daily Symptom Reflex Diary, as well as an intermittently distributed Patient Global Impression - Static & Change scales.
Participants for this study will be recruited from the Department of Otolaryngology (ENT) at Froedtert Hospital in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Patients seen by Froedtert ENT laryngologists who receive a diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) during a standard-of-care visit will be informed about the study and offered additional information regarding participation. Individuals interested in participating will be invited to attend a separate screening and consent visit at the Adult Translational Research Unit (ATRU) on campus. The study consists of eight research visits, including the screening/consent visit, conducted over approximately 14 weeks. Up to two study visits may be completed remotely (Visit 2 and Visit 8).
Data will be collected from participant medical charts for the 3 standard-of-care clinic visits; Clinic visit 1 & 2 are for diagnosis of LPR, while clinic visit 3 is a follow-up that occurs 14 weeks after visit 1 & 2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
4.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA 1. Age ≥ 65 years 2. Patient is not fluent and literate in English. 3. Pregnant (or plan to be) and nursing mothers 4. Women of child-bearing potential not willing to comply with contraceptive requirements during the study treatment and for 1 week following the last dose of study drug.
o Definition of women of child-bearing potential
Non-post-menopausal female, who has not had a bilateral oophorectomy or medically documented ovarian failure. A subject may be considered to be post-menopausal when there is either:
A female who has had a tubal ligation sterilization or hysterectomy would not be considered to be of reproductive potential unless participating in activities of reproductive potential other than heterosexual intercourse (e.g., egg donation, participation in in vitro fertilization).
Other acceptable highly effective forms of contraception include:
a. Patients with previously demonstrated clinically significant hypersensitivity (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome) to any of the components of this product or to amprenavir.
b. Patients taking any drugs that are highly dependent on cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 for clearance and for which elevated plasma concentrations are associated with serious and/or life-threatening events. Specifically i. Alpha 1-adrenoreceptor antagonist: Alfuzosin ii. Antimycobacterial: Rifampin iii. Antipsychotic: pimozide iv. Ergot derivatives: Dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine v. GI motility agent: Cisapride vi. Herbal product: St. John's wort ( Hypericum perforatum) vii. Lipid modifying agents: Lomitapide, lovastatin, simvastatin viii. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor: Delavirdine ix. PDE5 inhibitor: Sildenafil (Revatio) x. Sedative/hypnotics: Midazolam, triazolam 13. Patients not willing to avoid eating grapefruit and Seville oranges for five days prior to the first day of dosing study drug through the final study visit.
A repurposing approach, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trial of FOS-SA (used at 1,400 mg fosamprenavir calcium, twice daily) for 12 weeks in medically refractory patients with clinically diagnosed moderate/severe LPR (RSI > 13, RFS > 7 and MII-pH confirmed laryngeal reflux event[s]).
Non-active placebo pill formulation
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline (i.e., Pretreatment) in symptom severity as indicated by RSI Score over time, with the primary treatment comparison at Week 12 (End of Treatment Visit)
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline (i.e., Pretreatment) in symptom severity as indicated by Weekly Total DRSD Score (WTDS) over time, with the primary treatment comparison at Week 12 (End of Treatment Visit)
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline in endoscopic signs severity as indicated by Reflux Finding Score (RFS) over time, with the primary treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline in symptom severity as indicated by Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) over time, with the primary treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline in endoscopic signs severity as indicated by Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) score over time, with the primary treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline in symptom severity as indicated by Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) score over time, with the primary treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
The absolute change from baseline in weekly overall reflux symptom-free days as indicated by Weekly Symptom-Free Days (WSFD; i.e. the total number of symptom-free days per week, with symptom-free defined as "Did not have" response for all items on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "throat-clearing" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "throat-clearing" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "sensation of something stuck in the throat" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "sensation of something stuck in the throat" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "excess mucus in the throat" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "excess mucus in the throat" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "throat pain" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "throat pain" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "problem with the sound of your voice" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "problem with the sound of your voice" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "difficulty swallowing" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "difficulty swallowing" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "heartburn" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "heartburn (sensation of burning feeling behind the breastbone)" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "regurgitation" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "regurgitation (liquid or food moving upwards towards your throat or mouth)" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "abdominal pain" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "abdominal pain" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "bad breath" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "bad breath" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "cough" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "cough" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to 12-week post-treatment
The absolute change from baseline in weekly "difficulty breathing" symptom-free days (i.e. the total number of days per week that the patient responded "Did not have" for "difficulty breathing" item on the DRSD), over time, with the primary exploratory treatment comparison at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline to week 4 post-treatment.
The absolute change from baseline in symptom severity as indicated by RSI score over time, (up to Week 4), with the primary treatment comparison at Week 4
Time frame: Basaeline to week 8
The absolute change from baseline in symptom severity as indicated by RSI score over time, (up to Week 8), with the primary treatment comparison at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to week 4
The absolute change from baseline in symptom severity as indicated by RSS score over time, (up to Week 4), with the primary treatment comparison at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline to week 8
The absolute change from baseline in symptom severity as indicated by RSS score over time, (up to Week 8), with the primary treatment comparison at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Proportion of patients who are Responders (by RSI) at Week 12
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ally Vandenberg, BSc
CONTACT
Nikki Johnston, PhD
CONTACT
Medical College of Wisconsin
Other
A 12-Week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Oral Fosamprenavir for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Acronym: FLUTTER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06999577
Cough, Deglutition Disorders
San Deigo, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01854970
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07365046
Chronic Cough, Cough
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT03853772
Barrett Esophagus, Deglutition Disorders
Orange, California, United States
View Trial Details