Laser Aesthetic Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000, China
NCT Number: NCT07381218
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if focused ultrasound can improve facial skin laxity in adults. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
1. Does focused ultrasound treatment lead to clinically meaningful improvement in facial skin laxity compared with baseline assessments? 2. What treatment-related adverse events occur following focused ultrasound treatment, and how frequently and severely do they occur? Researchers will also compare outcomes between the two sides of the face treated with different focused ultrasound hand-pieces within the same participants to explore potential differences in clinical response and safety using a randomized split-face design.
Participants will:
Receive a single session of focused ultrasound treatment applied to both sides of the face.
Undergo standardized clinical assessments, imaging evaluations, and patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and during follow-up visits.
Be monitored for treatment-related adverse events throughout the study period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Focused ultrasound treatment delivered using the dot hand-piece (FUS-D), applied to the contra lateral side of the face during a single treatment session. Treatment parameters follow the predefined study protocol.
Focused ultrasound treatment delivered using the micro-focused hand-piece (FUS-M), applied to one side of the face during a single treatment session. Treatment parameters follow the predefined study protocol.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment
Facial skin laxity will be quantitatively assessed using the VISIA skin analysis system. Skin laxity-related parameters will be measured at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 1,3, and 6 months post-treatment. Higher values indicate greater skin laxity. The change from baseline at each follow-up time point will be analyzed.
Time frame: From treatment through 6 months post-treatment
Treatment-related adverse events will be recorded and evaluated throughout the study, including the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events following focused ultrasound treatment.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment
Differences in facial skin laxity between the two facial sides treated with different focused ultrasound hand-pieces will be evaluated using the VISIA skin analysis system. Skin laxity-related parameters will be measured at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Higher values indicate greater skin laxity. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment
Facial laxity will be assessed using the Merz Aesthetic Scale (MAS) based on standardized digital facial photographs. The MAS is a validated 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater facial laxity. MAS scores will be assessed by independent blinded evaluators at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.
Time frame: From treatment through 6 months post-treatment
Overall aesthetic improvement will be assessed using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) based on standardized digital facial photographs. GAIS is a 5-point ordinal scale (Grade 1=Exceptional improvement; Grade 2=Moderate improvement; Grade 3=Slight improvement; Grade 4=No change; Grade 5=Worsening of the condition). Lower scores indicate better aesthetic improvement. GAIS scores will be measured by both participants and independent blinded evaluators immediately post-treatment, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.
Time frame: Periprocedural
Pain intensity associated with focused ultrasound treatment will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. A randomized split-face comparison within the same participant will be performed.
Time frame: 6 months post-treatment
Participant satisfaction with treatment outcomes will be assessed at 6 months post-treatment using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will rate their agreement with statements regarding overall treatment outcomes on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
The Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Other
A Prospective, Randomized, and Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Focused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Laxity
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06997380
Facial Skin Laxity, Facial Wrinkles
Kowale, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07585591
Facial Aging, Facial Skin Laxity
Naperville, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03545412
Facial Skin Laxity
View Trial DetailsNCT01368965
Facial Skin Laxity
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details