Cardiac assist device implantation during surgical intervention
DeviceWireless cardiac assist device implanted without using CPB
NCT Number: NCT07632586
The Icoms® FlowMaker® is a cardiac assist system in the true sense of the word. As assisting means to help or rescue, its function is providing assistance to the heart, which will continue to have its own hemodynamic pump function. The effect of the Icoms® FlowMaker® is to add an additional quantity of blood flow on top of the native blood flow, during each systole. The heart continues to have its own contribution, but a more satisfactory blood flow is restored by the complementary action of the Icoms® FlowMaker® This study is a first in human test to evaluate the safety and the performance of the Icoms Flowmaker. The study population consists of patients with severe heart failure who are at high risk for a conventional LVAD and at high risk for a percutaneous driveline. Ten patients will be recruited and implanted In France , Slovenia and Czech republic.
The study objectives are:
o evaluate the safety and performance of the Icoms® FlowMaker® implantable device in patients with severe heart failure resistant to optimal medical therapy.
--Primary Objective: Assess safety and performance of the device at 30 days post-implantation.
Secondary Objectives: Evaluate the patient's hemodynamic and clinical status, and the device's functionality per technical specifications.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hospitalier IKEM, Prague, Czechia
The role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in the current landscape of heart failure (HF) therapies can only be appreciated by knowing the potential number of candidates for advanced HF treatment. HF prevalence is 2.6% in the over 300 million US population. Approximately half of all patients with HF have reduced, versus preserved ejection fraction (3.5 million). Only 10-15% of those belong to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IIIB-IV.
These data suggest that there are as many as 500,000 patients in whom either LVAD or cardiac transplantation could be indicated following current national guidelines.. However, taking into account important limitations based on age, comorbidities, social and financial constraints, the actual number might be less, but nevertheless 125,000 to 250,000 patients remain as potential candidates for this advanced therapy. The INTERMACS Class 4-7 . population presents an incidence of at least 100,000 patients per year in the USA, Canada and Europe. The main indications for the use of implantable LVADs in patients with end-stage HF are either as a bridge to candidacy (BTC), or as long-term option for those who do not qualify for cardiac transplantation, previously referred to as destination therapy (DT). Only 7.000 to 9.000 MCS devices are implanted worldwide every year, which represents a significant lack of treatment in such sick and mostly not elderly patients.
Consequently, there is a huge discrepancy between the need for MCS treatment (up to 250,000 patients) and the real proportion of patients implanted, due to known, much feared current LVAD-induced complications.
Yet, the greatest increase in LVAD volume has not been in those considered candidates for bridge to heart transplantation (BTT) but for DT, which requires technical improvements to expand MCS devices implants in less severe patients.5-6. The overall survival with LVAD therapy is ≈ 80% at 1 year, and 60% at 5 years, with survival for DT indication lower than other indications at all time points, because of higher incidence of comorbidities and LVAD complications . Presently, the use of the terms BTT or DT to define the indication for LVAD implantation is being replaced by whether the support is intended for temporary or chronic use10.
The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database now includes 25,000 patients:
All these precious epidemiological data highlight the crucial need for a new type of MCS device, being more physiological and pulsatile, without a percutaneous driveline (i.e. "fully implantable"). It needs to be easier to implant and/or replace, with less invasive surgery without CPB and thus, finally able to address the most important population of severe HF patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
AND fulfilling at least one of the following criteria approved by the International multidisciplinary expert selection committee:
OR
Exclusion criteria
Wireless cardiac assist device implanted without using CPB
Time frame: at 1 month post-implant
Survival free from stroke with MRS ≥ 3
Time frame: 1 month post implant
Frequency of device-related reoperations
Nota Bene: In case of device replacement or heart transplantation if the patient becomes eligible to transplant during the study, the time of induction of anesthesia must be considered as the success of the bridge to transplant.
Time frame: 1 month Post - implant
Frequency of Device-related infection
Time frame: At 1 Month, 2 month , 3 month and 6 month post -implant
1 NYHA functional status improvement
Time frame: 1month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month post-implant
Quality of Life Change (EQ-5DL).
Time frame: 1 month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month post-implant
Withdrawal of intravenous inotropic drugs.
Time frame: 1 month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month post-implant
Blood chemistry (LDH, Free Hemoglobin, Factor of Von Willebrand).
Time frame: 1month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month Post-implant
Improvement in 6-minute hall walk test
Time frame: 1 month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month post-implant
Time frame: 1month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month post-implant
Hemodynamic improvement (assessed by CO, aortic VTI, LAP, inotropic drugs weaning).
Time frame: 1month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month Post-implant
Assessment of the external coil of the Transdermal Energy Transfer (TET) System.
Time frame: 1 month, 2 month, 3 month and 6 month Post-implant
Time frame: 1 month, 2 month , 3 month and 6 month post-implant
Patient's ability to manage device alarms and the external controller, based on the device usability tests results and device deficiencies
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Armand A ADJE, Clinical Project Manager
CONTACT
+33640380538 ext. +33784895534
Stephane S Garrigue, PhD, MD
CONTACT
FineHeart
Industry
A Prospective, Single Arm, Multicentric, First in Human Study to Evaluate the Safety and Performance at 30 Days of the FineHeart Icoms® FlowMaker® in Subjects With Advanced Heart Failure.
Acronym: FAIR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06259045
Advanced Heart Failure, Body Weight
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07611188
Advanced Heart Failure, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Seville, Andalusia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT01210573
Advanced Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01643551
Advanced Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details