Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07611188

REACTION-VAD Trial: Remote Exercise Training Via Telemedicine in Patients With Long-Term Ventricular Assist Devices

Current international guidelines recommend that patients with a heart pump (left ventricular assist device, LVAD) participate in supervised exercise cardiac rehabilitation programs. However, not all patients with a heart pump are able to attend to a supervised program on a daily basis.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a home-based exercise program helps patients with a heart pump improve their exercise capacity and quality of life, guided by telemedicine tools including a mobile app, smartwatch, and remote medical checkups. The study will also provide information about the safety of this program by monitoring for any issues or symptoms during home activity.

The trial aims to answer the following questions:

* Does a 12-week remote exercise program improve patients' exercise capacity? This will be measured using the 6-minute walk test and a cardiopulmonary exercise test. * Is it safe for patients to follow this exercise plan at home while being monitored through a mobile app and smartwatch? * Does the program improve quality of life and reduce feelings of anxiety or depression? This will be assessed using widely validated questionnaires, such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

Researchers will compare the remote exercise program to standard care, which usually does not include exercise for patients who are unable to attend the hospital daily.

Participants will:

* Join the study voluntarily after signing a consent form. * Be randomly assigned, with a 50% chance of being in either the exercise group (following a structured plan with a mobile app) or the usual care group (receiving general written advice), to see which approach works best for recovery. * Follow a 12-week home-based routine if in the exercise group, including warm-up routine, walking or cycling, respiratory exercises, and light strength training, all supported by the mobile app, smartwatch, and professional monitoring. * Visit the hospital three times over six months for medical checkups, including walking and exercise tests, blood analyses, and questionnaires about physical and emotional health.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Introduction Although cardiac rehabilitation is recommended in patients with a durable Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), approximately 50% of candidates cannot attend in-person programs due to geographical dificulties.

Study Rationale and Design The RE-ACTION-VAD Trial is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a remote conditioning exercise program in patients with recent implantation of a durable Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD).

A total of 78 patients will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to:

  • Remote conditioning group: patients will undergo a three-month home-based program including aerobic, resistance, and respiratory training. Follow-up will be conducted through Telemedicine (mobile application and a smart watch); or
  • Usual care group: patients will receive written general exercise recommendations.

The primary objective is to assess whether there is an improvement in the distance covered on the 6-minute walk test at 6-month follow-up. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety, and improvements in cardiopulmonary exercise parameters, quality of life questionnaires, frailty scales, and psychological questionnaires.

Intervention Logistics

The 12-week program is divided into an initial educational phase and a remote phase:

  • Educational Phase (Week 1): Three in-person sessions to train patients on exercise execution, load management, and the use of respiratory devices.
  • Remote Phase (Weeks 2-12): Individualized home routines including aerobic training, strength training, and respiratory.

Quality Assurance and Monitoring Plan

To ensure the integrity and standardization of the intervention across the 10 participating centers, the following quality measures are implemented:

  • Site Monitoring: The study has contracted a Contract Research Organization (CRO), to perform clinical trial monitoring and auditing over a three-year period.
  • Standardization of Procedures: Researchers from all centers are required to complete a rotation at the Hospital Ramón y Cajal Rehabilitation Unit to unify exercise protocols. Monthly supervision meetings are held to evaluate compliance and resolve clinical doubts.

Safety monitoring board: independent adverse event assessment blinded to the intervention group.

  • Technical Validation: The mobile platform utilized for monitoring holds the requisite certifications, ensuring technical reliability and data security.

Data Management and Registry Procedures

  • Data Entry and Validation: Data is captured using an electronic data capture system. The system includes predefined rules for data ranges and consistency to minimize entry errors.
  • Source Data Verification (SDV): Investigators may cross-reference data from the electronic data capture system with hospital medical records to ensure accuracy, completeness, and representativeness.
  • Data Dictionary: A comprehensive data dictionary is maintained within the study's electronic data management system, encompassing variables such as anthropometric measures, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) parameters (VO₂ peak, VE/VCO₂, RER), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, biomarkers (NT-proBNP, CA125), and validated quality-of-life scales (KCCQ, MLHFQ).
  • Audit Trails: the electronic data capture system provides automated audit logs to track all data manipulations and user activity, ensuring full traceability.

Sample Size Assessment The study is powered to detect a clinically relevant difference of 35 meters in the 6MWT. Based on a standard deviation of 50 meters, an alpha of 0.05, and a power of 80%, 33 patients per group (66 total) are required. To account for an expected 15% dropout rate, the total sample size is set at 78 participants.

Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) All analyses will follow the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) principle.

  • Continuous Variables: Will be compared using the Student's T-test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney U-test for non-parametric data.
  • Categorical Variables: Will be analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test.
  • Missing Data Plan: While the ITT principle handles participants as randomized, the study also includes monthly supervision to incentivize compliance and minimize missing data.
  • Significance: A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Ethics and Confidentiality The protocol was approved by the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Ethics Committee (PI 143/25). Data is codified, and the link between codes and patient identity is stored in a password-protected offline file. Upon completion, anonymized data will be deposited in the Zenodo repository.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(must meet all):

  • Recent LVAD Implantation (<6 months)
  • Clinical stability (defined as meeting all of the following criteria): discharge from the LVAD implantation hospitalization, absence of inotropic medication, hemoglobin >9 g/dL, and no active infection.
  • Inability to participate in a supervised rehabilitation program (due to lack of availability, or inability because geographical reasons).

Exclusion criteria

(any):

  • Functional Inability to Perform Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
  • Prior Participation in a Supervised Rehabilitation Program (after the LVAD implantation)

Treatment and study plan

Remote Physical Conditioning Program (Telerehabilitation)

Other

The program includes structured warm-up routines, respiratory training, continuous aerobic exercise, and strength training, with remote follow-up conducted via telemedicine.

Usual care. No Remote Monitoring.

Other

General Exercise Recommendations (Written Instructions). No Remote Monitoring.

Primary outcomes

  1. Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Difference in walking distance (meters) in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Program Safety

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluate program safety: composite of device alarms, driveline infections, device-related thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, cardiovascular events, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure decompensations.

  2. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak measured in ml/kg/m2)

  3. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): VE/VO₂ slope

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in submaximal parameters: VE/VO₂ slope (dimensionless ratio)

  4. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): oxygen consumption at the first and second ventilatory thresholds

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in submaximal parameters: oxygen consumption at the first and second ventilatory thresholds (measured in ml/kg/min)

  5. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): ventilatory equivalents

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in submaximal parameters: ventilatory equivalents (measured in L/min)

  6. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Score (OUES)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in submaximal parameters: The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) was calculated from the linear relationship between VO₂ and log₁₀VE and is expressed in mL·min-¹/log(L·min-¹).

  7. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): Respiratory Exchange Ratio

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in submaximal parameters: Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER). The respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was calculated as VCO₂/VO₂ and is reported as a unitless ratio.

  8. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET): oscillatory patterns

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in submaximal parameters: oscillatory patterns (Yes/No)

  9. Quality of life (QoL): Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in quality of life measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

  10. Quality of life (QoL): Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ).

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in quality of life measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). MLHFQ is scored from 0 to 105, with lower scores indicating better quality of life.

  11. Frailty screening (FRAIL scale)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Frailty screening using the FRAIL scale. FRAIL is scored 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater frailty.

  12. Fried physical frailty phenotype

    Time frame: 3 months

    Frailty measured using the Fried Physical Frailty Phenotype. Fried is a score ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicate greater frailty.

  13. Psychological changes: depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II).

    Time frame: 3 months

    Depression symptoms were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). BDI-II yields a total score ranging from 0 to 63, with higher scores reflecting greater severity of depressive symptoms.

  14. Psychological changes: anxiety (HADS)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), specifically the anxiety subscale (HADS-A), which yields a score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores reflecting greater severity of anxiety.

  15. Psychological changes: caregiver burden (Zarit)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Changes in caregiver burden were evaluated using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), which yields a total score ranging from 0 to 88, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived caregiver burden.

  16. Respiratory muscle strength

    Time frame: 3 months

    Respiratory muscle strength was assessed by measuring maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) using a handheld device (RP Check, Sibelmed Diagnostics Ltd.). Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is expressed in cmH₂O, with higher values indicating greater inspiratory muscle strength.

  17. Prior outcomes in a 6-mont follow-up

    Time frame: 6 months

    All previously described outcomes will be compared at 6 months after study initiation.

Other outcomes

  1. Program Satisfaction and Adherence

    Time frame: 6 months

    Satisfaction with the program was measured via telemedicine app (daily questionnaires and adherence data).

  2. Comparison of Outcomes Between Remote conditioning and Supervised Rehabilitation

    Time frame: 6 months

    All previously described outcomes will be compared with those of our previous supervised rehabilitation pilot study (REHAB-ASSIST pilot study).

  3. Evaluation of Outcomes by Sex and by the aim of LVAD

    Time frame: 6 months

    All previously described outcomes will be analyzed by subgroups according to sex and the aim of the LVAD

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte, MD, PhD, Cardiologist

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34911917843

Ramon Garrido Gonzalez, MD, Cardiologist

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34911917843

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Puerta de Hierro University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Carlos III Health Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of a Remote Conditioning Program in Patients Supported With a Ventricular Assist Device: THE RE-ACTION-VAD TRIAL.

Acronym: REACTION-VAD

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
May 28, 2026
Registry last updated
May 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.