Cognitive-behavioral
BehavioralSeven sessions of group-based treatment targeting skills to improve dysfunctional pain-related thoughts and behaviors
NCT Number: NCT02683278
This study compares the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy for pain (CBT-P), mindful awareness and acceptance treatment (M), and arthritis education as an active control condition (E) on mental and physical health outcomes among adults with chronic pain due to fibromyalgia (FM).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Both cognitive-behavioral and mindful-acceptance based treatments impact pain and disability in people with chronic pain conditions like fibromyalgia. However, these treatments target different mechanisms. The focus of CBT is on helping individuals manage their thoughts and behaviors related to pain. In contrast, the focus of M is on improving individuals' ability be aware of and accept their experiences, and to develop their positive emotional resources.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Seven sessions of group-based treatment targeting skills to improve dysfunctional pain-related thoughts and behaviors
Seven sessions of group-based treatment targeting skills to improve mindful awareness and acceptance of pain and stress, and increase positive emotional experiences
Seven sessions of group-based education to provide information regarding managing a chronic pain condition, but with no exercises to promote skill development
Time frame: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 physical functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36: I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Time frame: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Time frame: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 Vitality subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Time frame: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, 12-mo followup
Assessed via the Hamilton Depression Inventory (Reference: Reynolds WM, Kobak KA. Reliability and validity of the Hamilton Depression Inventory: A paper-and-pencil version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Clinical Interview. Psychological Assessment 1995; 7(4): 472-83.
Time frame: Change from baseline, 6-mo followup, and 12-mo followup
Assessed via the SF-36 Social Functioning subscale (Reference: Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-83.
Arizona State University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06752590
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Nagakute, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT05237050
Chronic Pain, Fibromyalgia
Gap, Hautes Alpes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07665411
Fibromyalgia, Muscular Diseases
Covilha, Castelo Branco District, Portugal
View Trial Details