Central Venous Catheter
Deviceinstallation of Central venous catheter ultrasound guided
NCT Number: NCT02318940
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the installation of femoral central venous catheter (CVC) ultrasound-guided real-time 2D versus the landmark method
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 week–15 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hospital Exequiel González Cortés, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
STUDY DESIGN Multicenter prospective randomized study in pediatric intensive care units of the Roberto del Rio's hospital and Exequiel González Cortés' hospital. Patients from entering the study between the months of January/2015 to December/2015, after signing informed by their parents or legal guardian consent, this will be implemented by the resident
PATIENTS Previous studies report an average success rate of 50% on the first attempt in the anatomical method, both children and adults. Sample size is determined to improve on a 30% success rate using the ultrasound method. For a power of 80% in relation to success at the first attempt and with a confidence level of 95%, a total of 50 patients per branch is determined.
Method of randomization Using computer program the patient leaving 50 patients in the group with the anatomical method, and 50 patients in the ultrasound method are randomized .
OPERATOR Both installation landmark and ultrasound guidance will be performed by 3 or 4 team doctors resident in each center , who count on ≥ 3 years of experience in ICU and training in ultrasound-guided access .
DEFINITIONS
INSTALLATION METHOD
OUTCOME It was considered as primary outcome main installation on the first try , and secondary outcome cannulation success, number of attempts and , as a complication of the procedure, arterial puncture. Rescue will be used after the 5th attempt in the anatomical method that will change the method under ultrasound guidance . Failure to gain access shall be considered as successful cannulation and change of puncture site
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS For statistical analysis the Stata 12.0 software was used. Continuous variables were analyzed using descriptive analysis of normal distribution with means and standard deviations , and continuous variables were not normally distributed and qualitative medians and percentiles. For the primary outcome will be used to varying dicomtómic Chi square method
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
installation of Central venous catheter ultrasound guided
Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour
Percentage of Participants with successful installation on the first transcutaneous passage of the glass needle
Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour
Percentage of participants with successful installation of guide without difficulty in the femoral vein
Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour
Number of participants who succeeded in the installation of cvc in one, two, three, four or five attempts.
Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour
Percentage of participants with Arterial puncture aspiration
University of Chile
Other
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Two Methods for Installing Femoral Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Intensive Care Units : Anatomical Method vs Ultrasound in Real Time.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06510166
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04201223
Child, Melanoma
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07477535
Child, Functional Capacity
Istanbul, Ataşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04736030
Behavior, Child
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial Details