Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02318940

Femoral Central Venous Access Comparison of 2 Methods

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of the installation of femoral central venous catheter (CVC) ultrasound-guided real-time 2D versus the landmark method

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

1 week–15 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital Exequiel González Cortés, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Loading trial locations.

About this study

STUDY DESIGN Multicenter prospective randomized study in pediatric intensive care units of the Roberto del Rio's hospital and Exequiel González Cortés' hospital. Patients from entering the study between the months of January/2015 to December/2015, after signing informed by their parents or legal guardian consent, this will be implemented by the resident

PATIENTS Previous studies report an average success rate of 50% on the first attempt in the anatomical method, both children and adults. Sample size is determined to improve on a 30% success rate using the ultrasound method. For a power of 80% in relation to success at the first attempt and with a confidence level of 95%, a total of 50 patients per branch is determined.

Method of randomization Using computer program the patient leaving 50 patients in the group with the anatomical method, and 50 patients in the ultrasound method are randomized .

OPERATOR Both installation landmark and ultrasound guidance will be performed by 3 or 4 team doctors resident in each center , who count on ≥ 3 years of experience in ICU and training in ultrasound-guided access .

DEFINITIONS

  • Successful cannulation: is considered successful installation when the guide is installed without difficulty in femoral vein.
  • Cannulation the first try: is considered successful when installing the CVC is accomplished by first transcutaneous passage to the glass needle .
  • Attempt to cannulation: considered attempt the passage of the needle without removing or redirect moving forward. Each successive removal or redirection with a forward motion is considered more a try.
  • Arterial puncture: Arterial puncture aspiration involves pulsatile arterial blood .
  • Rescue: After the fifth attempt in the landmark method will change the method under ultrasound guidance and is considered not successful cannulation. Result of not having puncture site is changed.

INSTALLATION METHOD

  • Anatomical : In supine with external rotation and abduction of the lower extremity is located by palpating the femoral artery in the femoral triangle and punctured medial to this towards the navel to have reflux of venous blood.
  • Guided by ultrasound: Ultrasound is performed to verify the presence and proper position of a target vessel before puncturing the skin followed by real-time ultrasound to guide the needle tip during the lancing process.

OUTCOME It was considered as primary outcome main installation on the first try , and secondary outcome cannulation success, number of attempts and , as a complication of the procedure, arterial puncture. Rescue will be used after the 5th attempt in the anatomical method that will change the method under ultrasound guidance . Failure to gain access shall be considered as successful cannulation and change of puncture site

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS For statistical analysis the Stata 12.0 software was used. Continuous variables were analyzed using descriptive analysis of normal distribution with means and standard deviations , and continuous variables were not normally distributed and qualitative medians and percentiles. For the primary outcome will be used to varying dicomtómic Chi square method

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Need for central venous access

Exclusion criteria

  • More than 15 years.
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Anatomical and / or functional vascular alteration known

Treatment and study plan

Central Venous Catheter

Device

installation of Central venous catheter ultrasound guided

Primary outcomes

  1. Installation on the First Try

    Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour

    Percentage of Participants with successful installation on the first transcutaneous passage of the glass needle

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful Installation

    Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour

    Percentage of participants with successful installation of guide without difficulty in the femoral vein

  2. Number of Attempts

    Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour

    Number of participants who succeeded in the installation of cvc in one, two, three, four or five attempts.

  3. Arterial Puncture

    Time frame: intraoperative, an average of 1 hour

    Percentage of participants with Arterial puncture aspiration

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Chile

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Two Methods for Installing Femoral Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Intensive Care Units : Anatomical Method vs Ultrasound in Real Time.

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Dec 17, 2014
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.