Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05809856
Aim of this study is to investigate the clinical safety of a novel pediatric heart valve.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Defective or diseased pulmonary heart valves do not recover. If left untreated, pediatric and adult patients alike, face serious risks of progressive heart failure and death. Due to the insufficient care of children with heart valve defects, the valve replacement with regenerative, remodeling, and growth potential remains an unmet medical need. Therefore, the first pediatric heart valve (GrOwnValve) was developed to overcome the current limitations, which should offer regenerative potential that adapts to the somatic growth of the child. The study aims to investigate the safety and provide the first initial efficacy estimates of the transcatheter implantable GrOwnValve. This first prospective, non-randomized, single center trial in 7 study subjects (≥ 18 years of age) should be conducted to assess the devices safety for clinical application.
The novel interdisciplinary solution approach is based on the combination of individualized 3D modeling, viable autologous tissue (contrary to all other prosthetic heart valves on the market), and preservation of the regenerative capacity of the valve replacement by maintaining the vitality of heart valve cells and tissue through the application of a novel crosslinker in the tissue preparation process. The GrOwnValve prothesis has the potential to be the first durable and regenerative heart valve for adults. Fabrication is performed on-demand in the operating room. The trial should be the first clinical investigation assessing this novel heart valve replacement approach. We are aiming for the GrOwnValve to be the standard of care, replacing current solutions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The autologous GrOwnValve is implanted into a stent before it is implanted via minimal-invasive transcatheter technique into the patients with high-grade pulmonary valve insufficiency and right ventricular dilatation. Control intervention/Reference test: Since the study is designed for investigating the safety of the procedure, there will not be a control group. However, the outcomes will be compared as a non-inferiority analysis with the standard of current medical care (Edwards SAPIEN 3 or Medtronic's Melody, both bioprosthetic transcatheter pulmonary valves).
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
(valve-related, sudden, cardiac, and all-cause death)
Time frame: Up to 1 Year Follow-Up
Assessment if device-related major bleeding has occured by laboratory + echo + CT
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
Questioning if device-related re-operation occured
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
Measurement tool: Spiroergometry
o Parameters: cardiac rhythm, load duration, reason for termination, Heart rate at rest, blood pressure, maximum load level, VE/VCO2, PetCO2, VE/VCO2 slope, VO2, Respiratory rate, VD/VT, SpO2, RER, Borg score, FEV1, FVC
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
Measurement tool: Spiroergometry Parameters: cardiac rhythm, load duration, reason for termination, Heart rate at rest, blood pressure, maximum load level, VE/VCO2, PetCO2, VE/VCO2 slope, VO2, Respiratory rate, VD/VT, SpO2, RER, Borg score, FEV1, FVC
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
Measurement tool: Echocardiography + Magnetic resonance imaging Parameter: 1.) blood flow velocity / stenosis, 2.) stiff leaflet, 3.) valve opening area Decision rule: blood flow velocity >4 m/s, abnormal or no leaflet motion when compared to neighboring leaflets, > 0.70 for 17 diameter, > 0.85 for 19, > 1.05 for 21, > 1.25 for 23, > 1.45 for 25, > 1.70 for 27, 1.95 for 29, and 2.25 for 31 mm annulus diameter
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
Measurement tool: Echocardiography + Magnetic resonance imaging Parameter: 1.) vena contracta, 2.) Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) radius, 3.) Effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA=2π*r2*Va/Vmax), (iv) sagging leaflet Decision rule: 1.) less than or equal to 15% of the diameter of PA/stent at a Nyquist limit of 0.5-0.6 m/s, frame rate >20/sec, gain adjusted, sector small, 2.) equal or minor to 4 mm at a Nyquist limit of 0.2-0.4 m/s, frame rate >20/sec, gain adjusted, variance off, sector small, 3.) < or equal to 3% of the total cross-sectional area of the valve, 4.) n.a
Time frame: Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
Assessment if new or higher grade of cardiac arrhythmia occured, i.e. newly ventricular extra systoly
Time frame: Up to 1 Year Follow-Up
Measurement tool: Echocardiography + Magnetic resonance imaging + computed tomography Parameter: 1.) GrOwnValve annulus, 2.) no broken struts of the valve stent Decision rule: 1.) +/- 1.5 mm from the native pulmonary valve annulus, 2.) n.a.
Time frame: Up to 1 Year Follow-Up
Assessment of backflow and volume of blood by echo + MRI
Time frame: Procedure (intra-operatively)
Visual assessment of pericardium
Time frame: Up to day of discharge ( ≤ 30 days)
Post-procedure hospital stay in days.
Time frame: Procedure (intra-operatively)
Timepoints: Procedure Assessment: How long was the ventilation time for each patient within the allocation?
Time frame: Up to 3 months Follow-Up
Timepoints: Procedure + Discharge + Visit 1 Assessment: Is the implantation of a permanent pacemaker necessary due to disturbances or arrhythmias?
Time frame: Up to 60 months (5 years) Follow-Up
Timepoints: Discharge, Visit 1, Visit 2, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8 Assessment: Is a (Re-)Hospitalization necessary due to procedure- or device-related complications?
Time frame: Procedure (intra-operatively)
Timepoints: Procedure Assessment: How was the pericardiectomy conducted, via thoracoscopy or thoracotomy
Time frame: Follow-Up for 6 months
Assessment of the GrOwnValve procedure's safety. Therefore, procedure-related death, major bleeding, reoperation, and other complications will be documented combined and individually for 6 months. Whenever the procedure evaluates as "not safe", the reasons will be documented.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Boris Schmitt, Dr.
CONTACT
Frank Edelmann, Prof. Dr.
CONTACT
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Other
A First-in-Human Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety (and Short Term Effectiveness) of the Autologous GrOwnValve Transcatheter Pulmonary Heart Valve [GECT]
Acronym: GECT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03441971
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02987387
Aortic Valve Disease, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02555319
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Seoul, Haehak-ro Jongno-gu, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT00676689
Airway Obstruction, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details