Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04086095

Feasibility Study - Neofact

For therapy of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature babies, there are several established options. An important therapeutic aspect is the tracheal administration of exogenous surfactant into the child's lung.

In the recent years, several methods have been developed. The methods differ in the selected ventilation mode (intubation with mechanical ventilation vs. Continous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)-supported spontaneous breathing) and in the way in which the application of surfactant is technically conducted (via endotracheal tube, endotracheal catheter or nebulization).

In selection of ventilation technique, there is an upcoming trend towards less invasive respiratory support via CPAP. While this may increase the rate of complications on the one side (i.e. pneumothorax), it shows much lower oxygen demand and a shorter need for mechanical ventilation on the other side.

In the selection of the administration technique, different methods were repeatedly developed to adapt the surfactant administration to the CPAP therapy. In this study, a newly developed and in the European Community now certified (CE-Mark) application aid (Neofact) will be tested for the first time on preterm infants, to verify the feasibility.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 2 day

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Klinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and the need for Surfactant administration (oxygen requirement with FiO2 ≥ 30% and/or mod. Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 5)
  • Respiratory support with non-invasive CPAP at the time of Surfactant administration

Exclusion criteria

  • Preterms with an gestational age < 26+0 weeks
  • Preterms with malformations of the respiratory tract
  • Clinical decision on intubation / surfactant application via endotracheal tube e.g. because of respiratory drive disorder
  • (Missing parental consent)
  • (Attending physician is not delegated by the principal investigator)

Treatment and study plan

Neofact application aid

Device

The Neofact application aid is a specifically for the LISA procedure designed guide of a soft catheter and replaces the Magill forceps. Catheter (3.5 Fr.) and guide are already combined and packed together sterile. The catheter tip is marked in black (1cm).

Primary outcomes

  1. feasibility of the application aid Neofact

    Time frame: Administration of surfactant + 30 minutes

    Feasibility will be defined as a correct intratracheal position of the catheter (visually controlled via videolaryngoscope) OR responsiveness of the child to the surfactant administration (defined as decrease of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of at least 0.05 within 30 minutes after the application OR FiO2 decrease to 0.21 with simultaneous improvement of the modified Silverman Andersen Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 2 within 30 minutes after the application) without switching to a conventional LISA method

    RSS in the modified version of McAdams RM et al. The RSS consists of 5 categories that assess the respiratory work of the child in a range from 0 to 2 in each category. This results in a summarized score of 0 to 10, in which 0 defines a healthy neonate without increased work of breathing and 10 a neonate with maximum respiratory distress.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of the surfactant administration procedure

    Time frame: up to 20 minutes

    Measured time from the beginning of the initial insertion of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips) to the removal of the application aid Neofact (Neofact tip passes the lips).

  2. Duration of the laryngoscopy

    Time frame: up to 15 minutes

    Measured time from the beginning of the initial insertion of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips) to the removal of the laryngoscope (plate tip passes the lips).

  3. Need for intubation and mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 48 hours after administration

    Number of neonates that need intubation and mechanical ventilation in the observational period of 48 hours after surfactant administration

  4. Number of attempts needed for the correct application

    Time frame: during application procedure

    to evaluate how good the handling of the application aid will be

  5. Occurrence of complications

    Time frame: during application procedure

    Number of decreases of oxygen saturation (< 80% SpO2), bradycardia (< 80 / min), tachycardia (> 200 / min), arterial hypo- (middle arterial blood pressure < Gestational Age (GA)) or hypertension (middle arterial blood pressure > GA + 20), onset and / or severity of coughing, choking, apnea & laryngospasm during the procedure

  6. Colonization of the catheter tip

    Time frame: up to 20 minutes

    Name of germs and their number of colony forming units (CFU) placed on the catheter tip. To evaluate if there is a risk of contamination

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Tuebingen

Other

Collaborators

  • Klinikum Stuttgart

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility Study - Neofact Feasibility Study of the Application Aid Neofact (Formerly: QuickSF) in the Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in Premature Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Sep 11, 2019
Registry last updated
Nov 5, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.