Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05465083

Feasibility of Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Diaphragm Protection in Acute Respiratory Failure

This is a single-center proof-of-concept clinical trial designed to establish the feasibility of transvenous phrenic-nerve stimulation (PNS) to maintain diaphragm activation over the first 24 hours and for up to seven days of mechanical ventilation in patients who are likely to require more than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada

About this study

The diaphragm is the main muscle of breathing and for most of us therefore is continuously being used (and hence exercised) when in health. When people are unwell with severe breathing difficulties to the degree that their lungs are needing a lot of support from a breathing machine (ventilator) in the intensive care unit (ICU), or are recovering from major lung/chest surgery on a ventilator in ICU, the diaphragm can quickly start to weaken from its inactivity. This means that even when starting to recover from the underlying medical problem, or from the surgery itself, the diaphragm may be unable perform well enough to take over the work of breathing once again. This can lead to not only longer times on the ventilator (time to gradually rebuild diaphragm strength by rehabilitation and physiotherapy) but also therefore longer times in ICU and in hospital with the risk of complications that can be associated with this.

Stimulating the diaphragm by use of a pacemaker (electrical stimulation) is an established treatment for a number of patients with certain types of long-term breathing problems. These pacemakers are permanent and are inserted by invasive surgical methods. More recently however, there have also been a number of studies looking to see if it is possible to safely, temporarily and less invasively stimulate the diaphragm of patients who only have temporary diaphragm inactivity. This has been done either during surgery or during their intensive care stay. A number of methods of temporarily stimulating the diaphragm have been looked at, but the simplest has been to integrate the function of stimulating the nerves (that ultimately control the diaphragm) with a catheter that is frequently placed into a vein in the neck to enable delivery of medications during surgery and in ICU.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Group 1: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF)

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old, and,
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation for ≤ 7 days, and,
  • Have hypoxemia as defined by one of:
  • A PaO2:FiO2 ratio < 300 and PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O, or
  • SpO2:FiO2 < 315% on PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O in absence of an available arterial blood gas, and in the presence of a reliable Sp)2 trace and a SpO2 < 97%, or
  • Are receiving inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxemia, or
  • Require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and,
  • Are on controlled mechanical ventilation with no patient-triggered ventilator-delivered breaths with no imminent plan to transition to assisted ventilation within 6 hours, and,
  • Are not expected to be liberated from mechanical ventilation within the next 48 hours (from time of enrollment)

Group 2: Pulmonary endarterectomy

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 65 years old
  • Are listed for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy
  • Have pulmonary vascular resistance < 1000 dynes.sec.cm-5

Group 3: Lung transplant

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Are listed for bilateral lung transplant for a primary indication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with no plan for concomitant transplant of other solid organs

All groups

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Previously diagnosed neuromuscular disorder or known phrenic nerve injury
  • BMI >70kg/m2
  • Implanted electronic cardiac or neurostimulation device in situ
  • Contraindications to left internal jugular or subclavian vein catheterization (e.g., infection over the site, known central venous stenosis, septic thrombophlebitis, left internal jugular ECMO cannula in situ) and/or subclavian vein catheterization (to include poor target vessel)
  • Contraindications to esophageal balloon or EMG catheter placement (e.g. active bleeding or high-grade esophageal varices with recent bleeding or banding in previous 14 days, recent esophageal surgery or esophageal rupture)
  • Patient transitioning fully to palliative care
  • Treating clinician deem enrollment not clinically appropriate for other reason
  • Currently being treated in another clinical trial studying an experimental treatment that could affect the study primary outcome

Treatment and study plan

Lungpacer AeroPace Protect System

Device

AeroPace Catheter will be placed percutaneously into the left internal jugular vein or left subclavian vein and stimulating electrodes mapped for therapy.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of placing AeroPace Catheter

    Time frame: 30 days

    Feasibility will be defined as the device being successfully deployed in at least 11 of the 20 patients. Successful deployment of the device defined as:

    • AeroPace Catheter insertion and placement successfully confirmed
    • Initial Catheter electrode mapping/calibration successfully completed
    • Adequate diaphragm activation achieved, defined as hourly Edi level sufficient to generate a Pocc of ≤ -5 cm H2O, for at least 50% of LAPS-PNS stimulated breaths over the first 24 hours after commencing stimulation.
  2. Safety of AeroPace Catheter

    Time frame: 30 days

    The technique will be considered safe if there are no unexpected serious adverse events (USADEs) and the incidence of device- or procedure-related SAEs is below that established in literature.

Secondary outcomes

  1. LAPS-PNS successfully achieved at the time of the mapping/calibration procedure on each of the subsequent days up to the end of the study intervention period

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. The proportion of time that adequate diaphragm activation is maintained during phrenic nerve stimulation and during the absence of phrenic nerve stimulation.

    Time frame: 7 days

    This is defined as the percentage of hours the patient has an Edi ≥ minimum Edi required to maintain Pocc ≤ -5 cm H2O.

  3. The proportion of hours in which the maintenance of diaphragm activation is due to LAPS-PNS rather than endogenous patient respiratory effort.

    Time frame: 7 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto

Other

Collaborators

  • Lungpacer Medical Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Feasibility of Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Diaphragm Protection in Acute Respiratory Failure: the STIMULUS I Clinical Trial

Acronym: STIMULUS

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jul 19, 2022
Registry last updated
Dec 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.