Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04558307

Feasibility of Rapid COVID-19 Testing in Disadvantaged Populations

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of establishing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing at a federally-qualified health center (FQHC) during a global health crisis to mitigate COVID-19 disparities in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Accurate and early diagnosis of COVID-19 infections are critical for rapid initiation of quarantine interventions to reduce population spread and to provide appropriate medical care to reduce related morbidity and mortality during the current pandemic. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of establishing a drive-through rapid COVID-19 testing site at a federally-qualified health center (FQHC) during a global health crisis to mitigate health consequences in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. The investigators also seek to evaluate the effectiveness of community-driven communication in increasing access to rapid testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in this population. This will inform public health decisions about improving access to testing for SARS-CoV-2 in underserved populations, particularly those receiving care in FQHCs or community health centers.

The specific aims of the study are to:

Aim 1. To determine the feasibility of a community-engaged research partnership to support rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing for symptomatic patients of all ages in the underserved population during the COVID-19 crisis. A rapid testing strategy (drive-through testing site) at a FQHC using Mayo Clinic Laboratory (MCL) diagnostic processing will be piloted.

Aim 2. To compare the effectiveness of community-driven messaging in increasing uptake of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing compared with usual sources of health information. A simple random sample will be drawn of FQHC patients (N=1000, age 18+) with 1:1 randomization of communication about COVID-19 and availability of rapid testing from the FQHC versus usual sources (control).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • This study will include all patients receiving clinically indicated testing for COVID-19 at a federally qualified health center (FQHC, Open Cities Health Center, St. Paul, MN).
  • There will be no formal recruitment of patients in this research.

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

Pilot a rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy

Diagnostic Test

Rapid testing strategy at an FQHC using Mayo Clinic Laboratory (MCL) diagnostic processing with a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for SARS-CoV-2 and a Mayo Clinic drive-through collection protocol.

Community-driven messages to promote COVID-19 testing

Other

A one-time communication about the availability of COVID-19 testing at the FQHC to patients randomized to the intervention group using any available means of communication (text and/or mailed letter).

Primary outcomes

  1. Intervention Feasibility Measures - FQHC Staff

    Time frame: 6-months after intervention start

    FQHC staff will complete a comprehensive electronic survey adapted from the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) instrument to assess feasibility of community-engaged research partnership to support testing site (Weiner BJ, et al. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):108.).

  2. 2. Uptake of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy at the FQHC- Effectiveness of community-driven messaging to patients

    Time frame: 6-months after intervention start

    Comparison of number of tests completed per group (intervention vs. control)

  3. Uptake of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy at the FQHC

    Time frame: 9-months after intervention start

    Comparison of number of tests completed per group (intervention vs. control)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervention Satisfaction Measures - Participant Satisfaction with COVID-19 testing

    Time frame: 6-months after intervention start

    All randomized patients will complete a comprehensive survey with questions probing satisfaction with the drive-through testing site (ease of use, process, return of results, etc.).

  2. 5. Intervention Satisfaction Measures - Participant Satisfaction with community-driven messaging

    Time frame: 6-months after intervention start

    Compare the satisfaction of community-driven messaging on availability of rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing at the FQHC (intervention vs. control)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Enhancing Rapid Health Response in National Crises: Feasibility of Rapid COVID-19 Testing in Disadvantaged Populations Through Community-Academic Partnerships

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 22, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.