Molnupiravir
DrugMolnupiravir administered orally in capsule form every 12 hours for 5 days (10 doses total)
Other names: MK-4482
NCT Number: NCT04575597
This study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of molnupiravir (MK-4482) compared to placebo. The primary hypothesis is that molnupiravir is superior to placebo as assessed by the percentage of participants who are hospitalized and/or die through Day 29
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Clinica Independencia ( Site 3400), Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Molnupiravir administered orally in capsule form every 12 hours for 5 days (10 doses total)
Other names: MK-4482
Placebo matching molnupiravir administered orally in capsule form every 12 hours for 5 days (10 doses total)
Time frame: Up to 29 days
The percentage of participants who were hospitalized and/or died through Day 29 is presented. Hospitalization (all cause) is defined as at least 24 hours of acute care in a hospital or similar acute care facility. Death was due to any cause. Any participants with an unknown survival status at Day 29 were treated as failure. The analysis in Part 2 was based on all participants enrolled by the pre-specified futility/early efficacy analysis and was used for demonstration of superiority to placebo for the primary efficacy outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to 318 days
The number of participants with at least 1 AE is presented. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Time frame: Up to 5 days
The number of participants who discontinued study intervention due to an AE is presented. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to sustained resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of three consecutive days when resolution or improvement of the targeted sign/symptom was demonstrated and did not worsen by Day 29. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for sustained resolution or improvement is presented. Per protocol, participants without the targeted sign/symptom reported at randomization were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Up to 29 days
Time to progression of the targeted sign/symptom was defined as the number of days from randomization to the first of two consecutive days when the targeted sign/symptom was worsened. The median number of days from randomization to the first day on or before study Day 29 for progression/worsening is presented. Per protocol, participants with symptoms reported at randomization as severe for the targeted sign/symptom were not included in the analysis.
Time frame: Day 3
The World Health Organization (WHO) outcome scale is an 11-point ordinal score that categorizes clinical progression. Score ranges from 0 ("uninfected") to 10 ("dead") with higher score indicating clinical progression. The number of participants at each score category is presented.
Time frame: EOT (Day 5)
The World Health Organization (WHO) outcome scale is an 11-point ordinal score that categorizes clinical progression. Score ranges from 0 ("uninfected") to 10 ("dead") with higher score indicating clinical progression. The number of participants at each score category is presented.
Time frame: Day 10
The World Health Organization (WHO) outcome scale is an 11-point ordinal score that categorizes clinical progression. Score ranges from 0 ("uninfected") to 10 ("dead") with higher score indicating clinical progression. The number of participants at each score category is presented.
Time frame: Day 15
The World Health Organization (WHO) outcome scale is an 11-point ordinal score that categorizes clinical progression. Score ranges from 0 ("uninfected") to 10 ("dead") with higher score indicating clinical progression. The number of participants at each score category is presented.
Time frame: Day 29
The World Health Organization (WHO) outcome scale is an 11-point ordinal score that categorizes clinical progression. Score ranges from 0 ("uninfected") to 10 ("dead") with higher score indicating clinical progression. The number of participants at each score category is presented.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of MK-4482 in Non-Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05119855
COVID-19, Communicable Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05299359
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04939428
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04941144
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Tokyo, Japan
View Trial Details