Hebrew Rehabilitation Center
Roslindale, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
NCT Number: NCT04732533
In this project, the investigators propose to demonstrate the feasibility of remotely-monitored, caregiver (or spouse)-administered, home-based tES (transcranial electrical stimulation) intervention to improve mobility in ambulatory older adults with recent falls. This is a four-phase feasibility study in older, ambulatory adult participants at risk of falling due to a loss of balance (participant faller, PF) together with a willing and able participant administrator (PA) that is available during weekdays to administer tES to the PF.
Phase 1 is focused on the development and refinement of our training materials for home-based tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) for PF/PA pairs. The objectives of this phase:
1. Identify areas of confusion and challenges for older adults. 2. Refine our training materials to accompany the home-based tDCS system.
In Phase 2, the investigators will complete a pilot trial in 12 PF/PA pairs to assess the feasibility of deploying home-based tES in larger clinical trials, and to prepare for the development and implementation of such trials. The objectives of this phase:
1. Determine the mean/range number of visits needed for in-person training. 2. Compliance and retention with the study protocol. 3. Safety/side effects of home-based tES, as compared to previously established laboratory-based tES data.
The investigators hypothesize that adult PAs are able to successfully administer home-based tES to PFs. The investigators also expect that PF/PA pairs will exhibit excellent adherence to the intervention and that the prevalence and severity of reported tDCS side-effects will be similar to that observed in previous laboratory-based studies.
In Phase 3, the investigators will complete a pilot trial in up to 18 PF/PA pairs; i.e., those who have previously successfully completed either Phase 1 or Phase 2. The study objectives/aims for Phase 3 are:
1. Further explore compliance and retention with the study protocol over a longer time period 2. Identify safety/side effects of home-based tES over a longer time-period as compared to previously established laboratory-based tDCS interventions.
In Phase 3, the investigators hypothesize that adult PA's who have previously demonstrated the ability to successfully administer tES at home, will retain competence and compliance with administration over a longer period, up to 1 year.
In Phase 4, we will complete a pilot trial in up to 18 PF/PA teams; those who have previously successfully completed Phase 3. The study objective/aims for Phase 4 will be to:
1. Identify Safety, effectiveness and adherence to home-based tES over longer period of time as compared to previously established laboratory-based tES interventions. 2. Further explore the proof of Concept for the home-based tES interventions
In Phase 4 we hypothesize that adult PA's who have previously demonstrated the ability to successfully administer tES at home, will adhere with the study protocol over a longer period of time, up to 3 years.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Roslindale, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
In older adults, falls are costly, consequential and correlated with both physical and cognitive decline. Most falls occur when standing or walking, especially when completing these tasks in complex environments or while simultaneously performing additional cognitive tasks. To this end, older adults with worse cognitive "executive" function have worse mobility and are more likely to fall.
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES), which includes both transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS), holds promise as a therapy to improve dual task standing and walking and other "high-level" aspects of mobility in older adults. tES is a low cost technique, is very safe with only minimal side effects, is portable and is very easy to administer. However, tES must be administered numerous times per week for several consecutive weeks in order to induce lasting therapeutic benefit. As each tES session must currently be administered in clinical or laboratory settings, such interventions are not currently available to many older adults--especially those who 1) live far away from the clinical/laboratory, and/or 2) have physical and/or cognitive limitations that make it difficult to organize and utilize transportation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
PF group:
PA group:
Exclusion criteria
PF group:
PA group:
Phase 1: The participant will receive 10, 20-minute sessions of tDCS on Monday-Friday, at approximately the same time of day, over two consecutive weeks.
Phase 2: The participant will receive 22, 20-minute sessions of tES. 10 sessions will take place over the first two weeks on Monday-Friday, at approximately the same time of day. This will be followed by 3 tES sessions per week over four weeks.
Phase 3: The participant will receive up to 260, 20-minute sessions of tES. The participant can complete up to 5 tDCS sessions per week over 52 weeks.
Phase 4: The participant will receive up to 780, 20-minute sessions of tES. The participant can complete up to 5 tDCS sessions per week over 156 weeks.
Time frame: The whole data collection period of phase 2 (~ 6 weeks for the whole study)
The number of screenings needed to enroll one participant
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
Number of tDCS sessions completed
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The number, type, severity and duration of reported side effects
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The number of training sessions needed for PAs to successfully and comfortably administer home-based tDCS
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes gait speed
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes the control of standing posture.
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The change from baseline in cognitive executive function
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The change from baseline in gait speed
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The change from baseline in overall mobility function
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks for phase 2; ~ 52 weeks for phase 3; ~156 weeks for phase 4)
The change from baseline in global cognitive function
Hebrew SeniorLife
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05625828
Accidental Falls, Aging
Villeurbanne, Rhône, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06965660
Accidental Falls, Aging
Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03814304
Accidental Falls, Aging
Roslindale, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07567976
Accidental Falls, Aging
View Trial Details