Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03800758

Expressive Helping for Stem Cell Transplant Patients

The Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease (WISE) Study is a multisite Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) testing the efficacy of the Expressive Helping (EH) intervention among adults receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Use of stem cell transplant (mostly for hematologic cancers) is expected to increase 5-fold by 2030, when the number of survivors will reach 500,000. This highly toxic treatment causes a range of acute physical and psychological symptoms, which then persist for years for up to 45% of patients. To address gaps in existing symptom-focused behavioral interventions that can be added to standard patient care, the investigators developed Expressive Helping (EH), a low-cost, low-burden intervention that targets a range of physical and psychological symptoms in a broad group of transplant recipients. EH is completed in 4 brief structured writing sessions during and immediately after transplant, with instructions focused on having participants write about their transplant experience. Based on promising preliminary data, the investigators propose to determine whether EH can be used during and immediately after transplant to reduce common acute physical and psychological symptoms and prevent development of persistent physical and psychological symptoms. Assessments of physical symptoms and psychological symptoms will occur at baseline (prior to randomization), "nadir" (Day 7 post-transplant), "engraftment" (Day 14 post-transplant), 1 week post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention (primary endpoint, early post-transplant), 6-months post-intervention, and 12-months post-intervention (primary endpoint, later post-transplant). The investigators will also assess a select set of potential mediators and moderators of intervention effects. Participants will be adult cancer patients scheduled for allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant at the study sites. After screening and consent, eligible patients will be enrolled in a parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial. Randomization will be stratified by study site (JTCC, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, LCCC, or Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, RHLCCC); sex (linked with patient outcomes), age (18-59, ≥ 60), and transplant type (autologous, allogeneic). Staff performing assessments will be blind to study assignment. Participants cannot be blinded, but hypotheses will not be revealed to them until trial completion. They will be asked not to reveal their assignment to staff.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cancer patients
  • Age ≥ 18
  • English proficient
  • Scheduled for allogeneic or autologous transplant at JTCC, LCCC, or RHLCC.

Exclusion criteria

  • Current participation in a behavioral intervention targeting symptoms or quality of life
  • Cognitive or psychiatric impairment precluding ability to complete informed consent or study procedures
  • Literacy limitations precluding completion of a writing study
  • Undergoing a tandem transplant where participant is now completing the first of two or more planned transplants

Treatment and study plan

Expressive Helping

Behavioral

Expressive Helping (EH) is completed in 4 brief structured writing sessions during and immediately after transplant, with instructions focused on having participants write about their transplant experience using previously-tested EH instructions, adapted for this population.

Factual Writing

Behavioral

Factual Writing has been used with cancer patients and in the investigators' prior EH trial. It is completed in 4 brief structured writing sessions during and immediately after transplant, with instructions focused on having participants write about their transplant experience using standard Factual Writing instructions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden

    Time frame: Baseline to 3-months post intervention

    MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

  2. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention

    MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant

    MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

  2. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant

    MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

  3. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention

    MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

  4. Symptom severity: Changes in symptom burden

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention

    MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Bone Marrow Transplant (MDASI-BMT), which measures both the severity of and interference caused by 13 symptoms, plus 5 transplant-specific symptoms. Symptom severity is rated on a 0-10 scale (0="not present" to 10="As bad as you can imagine") to indicate the severity of symptoms in the past 24 hours. The mean of items are calculated to yield a symptom severity score in which higher scores indicate higher severity.

  5. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  6. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  7. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  8. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  9. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  10. Depressive symptoms: Changes in depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), is a 20-item measure that asks respondents to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = "Rarely or None of the Time," 1 = "Some or Little of the Time," 2 = "Moderately or Much of the time," 3 = "Most or Almost All the Time"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 60, with high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.

  11. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  12. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  13. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  14. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  15. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  16. Generalized Anxiety: Changes in symptoms of generalized anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), which measures generalized anxiety symptoms in the past 7 days with 7 items rated on a 0-3 scale (0="Not at all," 1="Several days," 2="More than half the days," 3="Nearly every day"). Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  17. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant

    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  18. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant

    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  19. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention

    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  20. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention

    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  21. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention

    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  22. Cancer-specific anxiety: Changes in symptoms of cancer-specific anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention

    Impact of event scale (IES), which includes 15 items that assess difficulties (intrusive thoughts and feelings, avoidance) caused by a traumatic event (in this study, the diagnosis and transplant). Respondents rate how much they were distressed or bothered by each difficulty during the past 7 days using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Responses are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology.

  23. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

  24. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

  25. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

  26. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline to 3-months post-intervention

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

  27. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-months post-intervention

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

  28. Quality of life: Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-months post-intervention

    Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) V1.2 Global Health measure, which includes 10 items assessing the domains of physical and mental health functioning, rated on a scale from 1-5 or 0 to 10, with specific responses differing across items. Items are summed and conversion tables are used to convert the simple summed raw scores into T-score values for each respondent. T-Score distributions are standardized such that a 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population, and the standard deviation around that mean is 10 points. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

  29. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 post-transplant

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

  30. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 14 post-transplant

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

  31. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-week post-intervention

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

  32. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to 3-month post-intervention

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

  33. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-month post-intervention

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

  34. Fatigue: Changes in fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to 12-month post-intervention

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which measures level of fatigue in the past 7 days with 13 items rated on a 0-4 scale (0="Not at all," 1="A little bit," 2="Somewhat," 3="Quite a bit," 4="Very much"). Eleven responses are reverse scored and responses are then averaged to yield a scale ranging from 0 to 52, in which higher scores indicate lower fatigue.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Collaborators

  • Hackensack Meridian Health
  • Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing Expressive Helping for Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
Registry last updated
May 6, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.