Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02474875

Explain Pain in Fibromyalgia Patients

Education of pain physiology is described as an educational session or sessions describing the neurobiology and neurophysiology of pain, and pain processing by the nervous system. There is compelling evidence that an educational strategy addressing neurophysiology and neurobiology of pain can have a positive effect on pain, disability, catastrophization, and physical performance in chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. Although pain physiology education has been studied in patients with chronic low back pain, chronic whiplash, and chronic fatigue syndrome in combination with widespread pain, studies in fibromyalgia (FM) are limited to a 2013 study with limited results.

The investigators propose a study with a higher dose of education of pain physiology (i.e. a higher number of educational sessions and total education time) to study if this generates a larger treatment effect in patients with fibromyalgia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Unviversidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for FM, both 1990 and 2010
  • Reported average pain intensity ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 cm visual analogue scale based on 1 week of daily pain diaries
  • On stable doses of medications for FM ≥ 4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

  • Suffer from an inflammatory rheumatic conditions
  • Have a planned elective surgery during the study period
  • Have ongoing unresolved disability claims
  • Experience symptoms of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, or psychosis
  • Do not speak Spanish fluently

Treatment and study plan

Educational program

Other

Patients in experimental groups will receive different educational sessions (contents and duration)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    On this continuous, horizontal scale used, where 0 is ''no pain" and 100 is ''worst possible pain" (0-100 mm line), subjects will be asked to mark the line with a cross somewhere between both extremes that best reflect their sensation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    A validated self-reported questionnaire developed for FM (scores range from 0 to 100, average FM patients score about 50 and severely affected patients score >70) wich measures multidimensional function/health-related quality of life.

  2. Change in Pressure Pain Threshold

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) is defined as the lowest pressure that, using standardized testing conditions, needs to be applied in order to cause the slightest sensation of pain. It is a reliable and widely used measure. PPTs will be the average intensity of three consecutive measurements, applied every 30 seconds, measured using an analogue Wagner algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT) fitted with a 1 cm2 pressure, with an approximate rate of pressure increase of 1 Kg/s.

  3. Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Physical Component Summary score of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF-36] will be used. More than 10% improvement in SF-36 physical function has been identified as a responder-to-treatment definition for FM clinical trials

  4. Change in Patient Global Impression of Change Scale

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The patient global impression of change scale (PGIC) is recommended for evaluating participant ratings of overall improvement in pain treatment trials. The PGIC uses a 7-point Likert scale that varies from 1 "very much improved" to 7 "very much worse" to quantify patient global response to treatment and have been previously used in FM treatment trials.

  5. Change in Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) includes 7 items to assess depressive symptoms, with each item answered on a four-point (0 to 3) scale so that possible scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. An analysis of data from three pregabalin FM trials supports diagnostic validity of the HADS by showing that, using a standard cutoff score of ≥11 on the HADS-D to identify patients with major depressive disorder

  6. Change in Fatigue Severity Scale

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)20 is a 9-item unidimensional measure of fatigue that has been demonstrated to be valid and reliabile in FM patients. The FSS measures fatigue by quantifying the impact of fatigue on specific types of functioning. Each item is scored on a 7-point rating scale, and the FSS score is derived by averaging all items to yield a score from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating more severe fatigue symptoms.

  7. Change in Jenkins Sleep Scale

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS) is a 4-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure how often a subject has experienced sleep problems in the past month and has been studied in FM patients and found to be valid, reliable, and able to detect change after treatment. JSS items evaluate trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, waking up several times, and awakening unrefreshed with each item scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 = "not at all" to 5 = "22-31 days." Scores vary from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating more frequent sleep problems.

  8. Change in Manual Tender Point Survey

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Manual Tender Point Survey (MTPS) is a standardized approach to performing the tender point exam in which FM patients rate pain severity upon digital palpation of each tender point on a verbal 11 point number rating scale. Pain severity ratings from the 18 tender points are averaged to yield a Fibromyalgia Intensity Score (FIS) that varies from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more severe tenderness. Change in the severity of pain at tender point sites has been shown to be a better measure of tenderness than change in the number of tender points.

  9. Change in Neurophysiology of Pain Test

    Time frame: Baseline - 6 weeks - 3 months

    The Neurophysiology of Pain Test-patient version consists of 19 true-false choice items (scores ranging from 0 to 19, with high scores representing a better knowledge regarding pain neurophysiology). This test evaluates whether patients can understand currently accurate information about the neurophysiology of pain.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cardenal Herrera University

Other

Collaborators

  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • University of Alcala
  • University of Valencia

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jun 18, 2015
Registry last updated
Oct 1, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.