Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07187310

EXORA vs ESP Blocks in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still considered the gold standard for the surgical management of gallbladder disease due to its minimally invasive nature, shorter recovery time, and reduced postoperative complications. Despite these advantages, patients frequently experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, particularly in the early postoperative period, which can impede recovery, delay mobilization, and increase opioid consumption. Excessive opioid use after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with several drawbacks, including nausea, vomiting, sedation, and delayed recovery. It also increases the risk of respiratory depression, especially in vulnerable patients, and may contribute to long-term opioid dependence. These risks highlight the importance of opioid-sparing strategies such as regional anesthesia techniques to improve patient outcomes and enhance recovery. Regional anesthesia techniques have emerged as essential components of multimodal analgesia strategies in abdominal surgeries. Among them, the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block has gained popularity due to its relative ease of administration and favorable safety profile.

Recently, a novel fascial plane block known as the EXORA block has been introduced as a promising alternative for abdominal wall analgesia. This block, which targets a different anatomical plane, is postulated to provide comparable or superior analgesic efficacy to traditional methods while maintaining safety and simplicity in execution. Given the ongoing pursuit of optimal analgesia with minimal side effects, it is essential to compare emerging techniques, such as the EXORA block, with established methods like the ESP block.

The authors hypothesize that the EXORA and the ESP blocks provide superior postoperative analgesia compared to controls in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and that the EXORA block analgesic profile is superior to that of the ESP block.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fayoum University hospital

El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514, Egypt

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Khaled M Sayed

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mohamed A Hamed

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mohamed A Hamed, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

1010509736 ext. +20

Mohamed A Shawky

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mohamed H Ragab

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Mohamed H Ragab, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

1090050298 ext. +20

About this study

Following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2025-updated statement, this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial will be conducted at Fayoum University Hospital (FUH) starting from October 2025 until the sample size is reached.

After obtaining approval from the local institutional ethics committee at Fayoum University Hospital (FUH) and registering the trial on ClinicalTrials.gov, all patients scheduled for elective cholecystectomy at FUH will sign a detailed informed consent form after fulfilling the eligibility criteria.

Patients will be randomly assigned to three equal groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1 (n=35) using computer-generated random numbers that will be sealed in a closed opaque envelope, opened by the anesthesiologist responsible for administering the ultrasound-guided block preoperatively

  • Group A (EXORA Block Group): Patients will receive bilateral EXORA blocks.
  • Group B (ESP Block Group): Patients will receive bilateral ESP blocks.
  • Group C (Control Group): patients will not receive any block, only standard care.

Preoperatively, all patients will be assessed and investigated by complete blood count, Prothrombin time and concentration, kidney and liver functions. Additional investigations, such as serum electrolytes, ECG, ECHO, etc., will be ordered upon individual patient assessment.

All blocks will be performed by an anesthesiologist experienced in regional blocks preoperatively in a separate block room under strict aseptic conditions using ultrasound guidance after applying standard monitoring (pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure, and electrocardiogram) and administering a sedative dose of intravenous midazolam (0.03 mg/kg).

For both groups A and B, sensory block will be assessed by a blinded anesthesiologist after 30 minutes from the block maneuver bilaterally from the distribution of the fifth Thoracic dermatome (T5) down to the level of the twelfth thoracic dermatome (T12). This will be accomplished using a pinprick with a blunt 20-G needle on a two-point scale, where 0 indicates the presence of sensation and 1 indicates numbness or absence of sensation in reference to sensation in the shoulder region. If no sensory loss is observed, the patient will be excluded from the study.

All patients will then be transferred to the operating room, handed over to the attending anesthesiologist who is blinded to group allocation and is responsible for further patient management. standard monitoring will be reapplied, and then general anesthesia will be induced using propofol (2 mg/kg), atracurium (0.5 mg/kg), and fentanyl (2 μg/kg). Anesthesia will be maintained with intermittent intravenous atracurium (0.1 mg/kg boluses) and an isoflurane inhalation in an oxygen and air mixture. An intravenous Ketorolac (30 mg), Nalbuphine (10 mg), and Ondansetron 8 mg will be administered approximately 30 minutes before the end of the operation.

After discharge to the ward, paracetamol 1g /8 hours and ketorolac 30 mg/12 hours will be administered to all patients. Both static (at rest) and dynamic (with movement) visual analogue scale (VAS) will be assessed at 1,2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours (where 0 denotes no pain, and 10 represents the most intense pain ever experienced), and if the VAS score is equal to or higher than 4, a rescue analgesic dose of nalbuphine 5 mg will be administered.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • ASA physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Chronic pain or regular opioid use
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy
  • Local infection at the block site
  • BMI more than 35 kg/m2
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Refusal to participate

Treatment and study plan

EXORA block

Procedure

in a supine position, a linear Ultrasound probe (L6-12 RS linear array transducer (6-12 MHz) on GE Healthcare Logiq P7, made in Korea) will be sagittally applied at the parasternal line, lateral to the sternum and xiphoid process. The probe will be manipulated craniocaudally to identify the 6th, 7th, and 8th costal cartilages. At the level of the 8th costal cartilage, a transverse orientation will be used to visualize the rectus abdominis muscle and the costal cartilage beneath. An 88-mm, 22-gauge needle will be directed in-plane from medial to lateral. After confirming the needle position below the rectus abdominis muscle using 4 ml isotonic saline as a hydro-dissection, 25 ml of plain bupivacaine 0.25% concentration will be injected. the spread of the local anesthetic is to be observed to advance laterally under the external oblique muscle and medially under the rectus muscle. The same procedure will be repeated on the other side.

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Procedure

in a right lateral position, the linear Ultrasound probe will be placed vertically 3 cm lateral to the midline at the level of the 7th thoracic spinal process, identifying the T7 transverse process, and the overlying erector spinae (ES) muscle. An 88-mm, 22-gauge needle will be advanced craniocaudally in-plane until hitting the T7 transverse process. After using hydro-dissection with 4 ml of isotonic saline to confirm the correct needle position, 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered below the erector spinae muscle. The same procedure will be repeated on the other side.

Primary outcomes

  1. Total opioid consumption

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after surgery

    Post operative nalbuphine used in the first 24 hours in milligrams

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative Fentanyl consumption

    Time frame: From induction of anesthesia until patient is transferred to postoperative care unit up to 4 hours

    Total fentanyl in milligrams

  2. Time needed to complete the block

    Time frame: From start of block procedure up to 1 hour

    In minutes

  3. Sensory block distribution level (pin-prick test)

    Time frame: after 30 minuets from the block maneuver bilaterally

    sensory block will be assessed by a blinded anesthesiologist after 30 minutes from the block maneuver bilaterally from the distribution of the fifth Thoracic dermatome (T5) down to the level of the twelfth thoracic dermatome (T12). This will be accomplished using a pinprick with a blunt 20-G needle on a two-point scale, where 0 indicates the presence of sensation and 1 indicates numbness or absence of sensation in reference to sensation in the shoulder region.

  4. Heart rate

    Time frame: Upon arrival to Operating Room until 24 hours postoperative

    Heart rate (HR) recorded intra and post operative

  5. Blood pressure

    Time frame: Upon arrival to Operating Room until 24 hours postoperative

    Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

  6. Postoperative pain scores by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: From patient discharge to postoperative anesthesia care unit 24 hours postoperatively

    score from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain

  7. Rescue analgesia

    Time frame: Upon recovery from General anesthesia up to 24 h postoperatively

    Time to first request of rescue analgesia

  8. Incidence of opioid-related side effects

    Time frame: From induction of anesthesia up to 24 h postoperatively

    Assessment of each patient looking for any of the side effects of opioids as nausea, vomiting, sedation.

  9. Incidence of Block-related side effects

    Time frame: From the time just after giving the block up to 24 h postoperatively

    any Block-related side effects as Local anesthetic systemic toxicity, bleeding, pneumothorax, local infection.

Other outcomes

  1. Quality of recovery (QoR-15)

    Time frame: At 24 hours postoperatively

    scores range from 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of postoperative recovery.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Khaled M Sayed, Bch

CONTACT

[email protected]

1065444158 ext. +20

Mohamed H Ragab, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

1090050298 ext. +20

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fayoum University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Analgesic Efficacy of EXORA Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 22, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.