German Institute of Human Nutrition
Potsdam, Brandenburg, 14558, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06515717
The study will examine the effect of exogenous ketone ester on behavior and metabolism using Virtual Reality and computerizes behavioral tasks.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Potsdam, Brandenburg, 14558, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
This study investigates the effects of exogenous ketone ester on behavior, cognition, and metabolism over one week of consumption. Using a within-subjects, randomized, crossover design, participants will undergo two phases: one with the ketone ester supplement and one with a calorie- and taste-matched placebo. The study includes four lab visits: visits 1 and 3 mark the first day of each intervention, while visits 2 and 4 mark the last day. During each visit, participants will complete behavioral tasks, questionnaires, and blood tests. Additionally, participants will record their food intake via an app and collect stool samples throughout the intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
oral supplement
oral supplement calorie and taste matched to ketone supplement
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
Using different scenes in Virtual Reality, parameters of motion behavior such as speed (measured in meters per second) and distance walked (measured in meters) will be assessed using motion tracking technology. These measurements will be combined to generate a composite score of anxiety-related motion behavior.
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
The choice (accept/reject) between a risk/gamble or safe option, based on a task paradigm by Liu et al. (2021)
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
based on a task paradigm by Goette et al., 2015
Time frame: on day 1 of each intervention arm (visit 1 and 3)
based on a task paradigm by Eisenstein et al. 2015
Time frame: on day 1 of each intervention arm (visit 1 and 3)
based on a task paradigm by Szameitat et al., 2002
Time frame: baseline, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Blood samples
Time frame: baseline, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Blood samples
Time frame: baseline and + 90 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Blood samples
Time frame: every 15 Minutes from visit 1 to visit 2 and again from visit 3 to visit 4
Continuous Glucose Monitoring through sensors applied to skin
Time frame: baseline, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Blood samples
Time frame: baseline, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Blood samples
Time frame: between 30 and 60 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Electrophysiological recording
Time frame: between 30 and 60 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Electrophysiological recordings
Time frame: between 30 and 60 minutes post drink-consumption on each of the 4 visits
Electrophysiological recordings
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
reported by participants on visual analog scale (1-7) during Virtual Reality. 1 being no anxiety to 7 being high anxiety
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
reported by participants on visual analog scale (1-7) during Virtual Reality. 1 being no stress to 7 being high stress
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
Assessed via stool samples after each intervention
Time frame: 5 days of each intervention arm
Self-reported food intake recorded via FoodApp or handwritten food diary
Time frame: baseline before visit 1
Trait version of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Grimm et al. 2009). High scores mean high trait anxiety.
Time frame: on day 1 and 8 of each intervention arm (visit 1,2,3,4)
State version of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Grimm et al. 2009). High scores mean high state anxiety.
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA; Bornemann et al. 2015). High scores mean high interoceptive ability.
Time frame: baseline, and on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 1, 2, and 4)
Becks Depression Inventar (BDI; Kühner et al. 2007). High scores mean high depression scores
Time frame: on day 1 and 8 of each intervention arm (visit 1,2,3,4)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Janke et al. 2014). High score on positive scale mean high positive mood and high scores on negative scale mean high negative mood.
Time frame: baseline (visit 1)
Behavioral Inhibition and Activation (BISBAS; Strobel et al. 2001). High scores on inhibition scale mean high inhibition and high scores on activation scale mean high activation.
Time frame: baseline (visit 1)
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS; Barratt et al. 1965). High scores mean high impulsivity.
Time frame: baseline, and on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 1, 2, and 4)
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Heimberg et al. 1999). High scores mean high scoial anxiety
Time frame: on day 1 of each intervention arm (visit 1 and 3)
Flow state scale (FSS; Rheinberg et al. 2002) asked after Dual Task. High scores mean more flow experience during the dual task.
Time frame: baseline (visit 1)
Salzburg Emotional Eating Scale (SEES; Meule et al. 2018)
Time frame: baseline (visit 1)
Salzburg Stress Eating Scale (SSES; Meule et al. 2018)
Time frame: baseline, and on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 1, 2, and 4)
Social Dominance and Aggressive Dominance Scale (Kalma et al. 1993)
Time frame: on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 2 and 4)
Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSNF; Heissel et al. 2019)
Time frame: baseline (visit 1)
Big Five Inventory (BFI; John et al. 1991)
Time frame: baseline (visit 1)
Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ; Horne & Östberg, 1976)
Time frame: baseline, and on day 8 of each intervention arm (visit 1, 2, and 4)
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ; Fliege et al. 2001)
Time frame: 5 days of each intervention arm
reported via FoodApp once per day
Time frame: 5 days of each intervention arm
reported via FoodApp once per day
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Beatrix Keweloh
CONTACT
Soyoung Q Park, Prof.
CONTACT
German Institute of Human Nutrition
Other
Exogenous Ketones and Behavior (ExoKet)
Acronym: ExoKet
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06632158
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Eugene, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06705179
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05089955
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04762654
Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety, Dental
Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details