Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05032872

Exergame Study for Family Caregivers

The goal of this study is to examine Go&Grow as a social exergame intervention to increase physical activity and social support, to promote well-being in family caregivers, and to test social support and physical activity as mechanisms for the effects of the intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Brandeis University

Waltham, Massachusetts, 02453, United States

About this study

The study is a 2-week baseline and 6-week intervention aimed at comparing the feasibility and efficacy of an exergame (Go&Grow without social contact components) and a social exergame (full version of Go&Grow) in promoting physical activity, social support, and well-being in family caregivers. The study also seeks to test social support and physical activity as mechanisms for the relationships between condition (exergame non-social vs social exergame) and wellbeing. Participants will be randomly assigned using a random assignment generator to either the control condition (exergame non-social) or the treatment condition (social exergame) on a rolling basis. Participants from both conditions will be reminded daily via app-based notifications during the intervention period to wear their Fitbit and to play the game.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants who are caregivers for a family member (e.g., relative, spouse, friend) who is 65 years or older and is either frail, has a disability, or has at least one chronic illness
  • 40 years or older
  • Own an Android smartphone with Google play store/internet access
  • Able to walk for at least 20 minutes at a time
  • Comfortable wearing a fitness tracker for the duration of the study
  • Familiar with smartphone app usages
  • Comfortable with using the study-related app for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Had a recent (within the past 6 months) cardiovascular event or fall.
  • Currently participating in any other physical activity study/intervention
  • Currently own or use a Fitbit or other activity tracking watches
  • Knows someone who is participating or has participated in the study
  • Currently physically active (exercise regularly 3 times a week or more for at least 30 minutes)
  • More than 2 errors on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (Pfeiffer, 1975).

Treatment and study plan

Social Exergame Treatment Group

Behavioral
  • Physical activity tracking, walk to grow flowers and plant their own garden
  • Follow workout tutorials
  • Daily steps tracked by Fitbit and workout log tracked by the app
  • Daily reminders to wear Fitbit, use the app, and share stories to unlock new flowers to grow
  • Includes social features: like, reply, and see other's stories, and share their stories; Access to other people's gardens
  • In-app rewards (unlock new flowers to grow each week) if participants post stories

Control Group

Behavioral
  • Physical activity tracking, walk to grow flowers and plant their own garden
  • Follow workout tutorials
  • Daily steps tracked by Fitbit and workout log tracked by the app
  • Daily reminders to wear Fitbit and use the app

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Steps

    Time frame: Percent Change of Steps from baseline to Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8

    Steps were automatically synced from the Fitbit for both conditions daily. Days with 500 or fewer recorded steps were coded as missing. Weekly step averages were calculated for weeks with 4 or more days not coded missing. The first two weeks of baseline steps were averaged to form the baseline step.

    Percent change of steps was calculated as the difference between the average weekly steps during the intervention (weeks 3-8) and baseline steps divided by baseline steps.

  2. Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS)

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    Self-report measure of social support from the Lubben Social Network Scale for family and friends with scores summed across 18 items. Possible scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher social support.

  3. Social Connectedness Scale

    Time frame: Baseline (Average of Week 1 and 2), Weekly during the intervention from Week 3 to 8

    Social Connectedness Scale was administered weekly during the intervention with the following subscales:

    relationship salience, shared understandings, knowing other's experiences, satisfaction with the contact quantity and quality, and dissatisfaction with contact quantity. Scores were averaged across items from each subscale and possible scores ranged from 1 to 7 with higher scores indicating a higher level of the subscale.

  4. UCLA Loneliness Scale

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    The UCLA Loneliness Scale captures one's subjective feelings of loneliness over the past week for weekly surveys and over the past month for pretest and posttest surveys (20 items with ratings from 1 "Never" to 4 "Often"). The scores were averaged across the 20 items, with a score ranging from 1-4. A higher score indicates more loneliness.

  5. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (20 Items)

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) (20 items) asks participants to report how often participants felt positive and negative feelings over the past week for weekly surveys, and over the past month for pre-test and post-test surveys. Scores were averaged across the items (Total positive and negative affect scores can range from 0-4, with a higher score indicating a higher level of positive affect or negative affect).

  6. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) asks participants' stress perception over the last month and scores were summed across the items (Possible scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher stress).

  7. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)

    Time frame: Baseline (Average of Week 1 and 2), Weekly during the intervention from Week 3 to 8

    Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) captures participants' psychological distress over the past week, scores were summed across the items (Total score ranges from 0-72, with higher scores indicating more stress) (Derogatis, 1975).

  8. Caregiver's Stress Scale

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    Caregiver's Stress Scale has a series of subscales based on a conceptual model of caregivers' stress: overload, relational deprivation, job and caregiving conflict, role captivity, sense of self, caregiving competence, personal gain, management of situation, management of meaning, management of distress, and expressive support. Each subscale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), and each subscale was averaged (with possible score ranging from 1-4) so that higher scores would indicate a higher value.

  9. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Version

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version. A continuous score was calculated expressed as MET (Metabolic Equivalents) minutes per week: Total MET-min/week = (Walk METs*min*days) + (Mod METs*min*days) + Vig METs*min*days). A higher score means a higher level of physical activity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exercise Self-Efficacy

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    9 items assessed how certain participants will exercise under certain circumstances (e.g., when you are feeling under pressure or when you are away from home). Items are assessed from 1 (very sure) to 4 (not at all sure). Items were reverse coded and summed across all items with a score ranging from 9 to 36. A higher score indicates higher exercise self-efficacy.

  2. Satisfaction With Life Scale

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    Items are assessed from 1 (disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly) summed across all items, ranging from 5-35. A higher score indicates a higher satisfaction with life.

  3. Sense of Control

    Time frame: Pretest (before week 1) and posttest (after week 8)

    items were used to assess sense of control. For example: "There is little I can do to change many of the important things in my life." Items are assessed from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) and reverse coded. A sum across all items was calculated ranging from 6-42. A higher score indicates a higher sense of control.

  4. Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire (EEQ)

    Time frame: Posttest (after week 8)

    Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire (EEQ) was included in the posttest, which measured how much participants enjoyed the exergame (Fitzgerald et al., 2020). 20 items ranged from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) were summed. Scores rannged from 20 - 100, with a higher score indicating more exergame enjoyment.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Brandeis University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Registry information

Official study title

Social Exergame Intervention to Promote Physical Activity, Social Support, And Well-Being in Family Caregivers

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Sep 2, 2021
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.