Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01953666

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Word Prediction Software to Text Input Speed for Tetraplegia

Computers now play an important role in the lives of most individuals.Access to computers is crucial for people with disabilities and may improve their quality of life. The use of computers can facilitate mainstreaming at school, for example, and the Internet may provide a valuable means of communication. However, the use of computers requires a certain degree of motor ability. People with motor disabilities frequently experience difficulties using a standard keyboard and standard pointing input systems such as a mouse. Many solutions exist to facilitate computer access, depending on the person's specific impairments and the purpose for which the computer is used. The most common solution relies on the use of a virtual keyboard which is directly displayed on the computer screen. The selection of the desired key on the virtual keyboard can be handled by a large variety of input devices, from a microgravity mouse to single switch devices supplemented by a process of dynamic scanning of the keyboard.Although such assistive devices render computers accessible to people with disabilities, the actual inputting of text can be very slow. A method to increase text input speed is to display words which are predicted from the letters previously typed. Word prediction reduces the number of necessary key strokes by avoiding having to type the whole word. The effect on text input speed is, however uncertain and results in the literature are inconclusive. Indeed, word prediction software provide a enhancement of cognitive load which decrease text input speed.The reduction of cognitive load could therefore be based in part on the optimization settings of the software and / or achievement of a rehabilitation program.Our hypothesis are for people with spinal cord injury : i) optimization settings word prediction software and ii) a rehabilitation program could improve the text input speed.The investigators propose to study the influence of settings word prediction software on text input speed and the influence of a rehabilitation program provided by a therapist, focused on word prediction software to help integrate them. The aim is to increase the performance of people with spinal cord injury and their satisfaction.

The first phase of this research is to select the word prediction software and configuration that provides the best user support.The second phase corresponds to the objective of evaluating the efficiency of a rehabilitation program .

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hopital Raymond Poincare

Garches, 92380, France

About this study

PHASE 1 : The first phase studied the repeated measurement of the efficiency of typing text topics in various situations. Each subject will copy a text different in each test and in a random order. Similarly, if the word prediction software has a capacity for self-improvement the internal dictionary, it will be disabled.

the investigators will study one setting of the configuration word prediction software. Are available the length of the list of proposals for which three options are selected: 1, 3 or 5 words, according to the literature and to the results of a questionnaire.This questionnaire was sent to identify the use of people with spinal cord injury and professionals about word prediction software.

The list of words is in the upper position of the screen based on the results of the questionnaire.

Four combinations will be tested on each subject. Twelve Tetraplegics will be required in each group (one group using a virtual keyboard and one group using the physical keyboard) Each combination will be tried for 10 minutes.

PHASE 2 :

The second phase will evaluate the effeciency of a rehabilitation program reduced cognitive load generated by the software predictions words.

The investigators propose an evaluation of the effects of 12 training sessions in a controlled, randomized, three parallel groups (experimental group : rehabilitation program, a group : a self-learning and a group : no learning).

Text input tests will be performed before and after the training sessions for people who have rehabilitation program. For the other two groups, those will be reviewed one month after the first test.

For this evaluation, a different text but with the same difficulty will be used. The order of execution will be randomized.

At the end of the month the three groups will be evaluated according to the same procedures for the firts test.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Tetraplegia (between C4 and C8 ASIA) more than 6 months.
  • Can read and write
  • No visual problems preventing the use of computers.
  • Recipient of a Health Insurance Plan
  • Having read information note.

Exclusion criteria

  • Moving in progress or predictable

Treatment and study plan

Rehabilitation program

Other

Rehabilitation program with an occupational therpasit

3 training sessions (one hour) per week for a month (12 sessions)

Self - Training at home

Other

Only instructions for a self - training at home

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Text Input Speed at 1 month

    Time frame: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 months

    text input speed (characters/minute)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Errors at 1 month

    Time frame: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

    We record errors in text entry test

  2. Change from Prediction use at 1 month

    Time frame: Phase after every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

    Number of use of word prediction software

  3. Change from Satisfaction

    Time frame: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

    Satisfaction of people with spinal cord injury about word prediction software (visual analogue scale)

  4. Change from Cognitive load at 1 month

    Time frame: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

    Cognitive load of people with spinal cord injury (visual analogue scale)

  5. Change from Speed sensation at 1 month

    Time frame: Phase 1 After every test (10 minutes) Phase 2 : 1 month

    speed sensation of people with spinal cord injury with word prediction software (visual analogue scale)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Phase 1 Evaluation of the Influence of Settings of Word Prediction Software (Phase 1)and the Efficiency of Rehabilitation Programm (Phase 2)to Text Input Speed for People With Spinal Cord Injury

Acronym: Smartwrite

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2017
First posted
Oct 1, 2013
Registry last updated
Sep 6, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.