Funda Çağırır Dindaroğlu
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06220383
This study aims to evaluate and compare the change on occlusion after placing stainless steel crowns (SCC) using Hall technique and conventional technique in children between the ages of 5-8. In addition, the investigators planned to analyze the change in oral health-related quality of life between SCC applied with the Hall technique and SCC applied with the conventional method, before and after clinical application.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–8 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
First, the participants who met the inclusion criteria were included in 2 study groups according to age, gender, dental experience, tooth number, applied stainless steel crown technique, Decayed, Missing due to caries, and Filled teeth in the permanent teeth/decayed, missing due to caries, and filled teeth in the deciduous teeth (DMFT/dmft index) values and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) and radiographic evaluation criteria. In the experimental group, stainless steel crowns were placed on the teeth of 39 participants using the Hall technique. In the control group, stainless steel crowns were placed on the teeth of 39 participants using conventional technique.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prepless crown technique
1 or 1,5 mm preparation on mesial, distal and occlusal of the tooth
Time frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
Intrusion scores in Hall technique 0-3, where 0 means no movement, 3 means intrusion
Time frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
0-3, where 0 means no movement, 3 means extrusion
Time frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
0-2, where 0 means no movement, 2 means no closure
Time frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
0-2, where 0 means no movement, 2 means no closure
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure and one month control
Child sections have a possible range from 0 to 36. 0=Never or hardly ever 36= Occasionally, often, or very often
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure and one month control
Family sections have a possible range from 0 to 16. 0=Never or hardly ever 16= Occasionally, often, or very often
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Other
Evaluation of The Effect of Crowns Applied wıth Hall Technique on Occlusion: Randomized Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05301647
Allergy Pollen, Child, Only
Naples, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07606222
Child, Only, Hemiplegia
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07576738
Aerobic Exercise, Behavior
Gaziantep, Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07160478
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Lleida, Spain
View Trial Details