Jockey Club Building for Interdisciplinary Research 5 Sassoon Road, Pok Fu Lam, HONG KONG
Hong Kong
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06310148
The Chronic Disease Co-Care (CDCC) Pilot Scheme is initiated for early screening and management of people with hypertension (HT), pre-diabetes mellitus (pre-DM) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in Hong Kong. This study will evaluate the quality of care, feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Scheme.
This is a 12-month cohort study among the District Health Centre (DHC) or DHC Express, healthcare providers, CDCC participants and a comparison group of 1,886 non-participants. All the person-in charge, 2 family doctors and 1 of each allied health provider from each DHC/DHC Express will be administered with the questionnaires on quality of care and costing. All CDCC participants will be included in subject characteristics, among which a convenience sample of 548 will complete a telephone survey on experience, enablement and satisfaction of the CDCC Pilot Scheme. The health outcomes of 1,886 CDCC participants and 1,886 non-participants will be compared for evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Participant characteristics, enablement, compliance to the standards of care, and costing of CDCC Pilot Scheme will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Differences in the proportion of patients meeting treatment targeted for HT, pre-DM and DM after 12 months will be compared by chi-squared test and logistic regressions. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be evaluated by comparing with the World Health Organization (WHO) threshold. This study will inform future healthcare planning and policy for manpower and resource allocation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info45 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hong Kong
Location status: Recruiting
This study aims to evaluate the quality of care, feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the CDCC Pilot Scheme in Hong Kong. The objectives of this study are the following:
The detailed study design of each objective are:
Objective (a): All participants in CDCC Pilot Scheme between 1 Jan 2024 and 30 Jun 2024 will be included in the evaluation. The characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, and medications of the participants will be summarized using descriptive statistics.
Objective (b): For the evaluation of the structure of care, quantitative data will be collected through structured questionnaires on the quality of care with DHC/DHC Express managers at 6 months and repeated at 12 months. Each DHC/DHC Express will also nominate two family doctors and one of each network allied health professionals (optometrists, podiatrists, dietitians, and physiotherapists subject to the availability in each center) within their service network to complete the questionnaire at 12 months. For the evaluation of the standards on process and outcome of care, all participants in the CDCC Pilot Scheme between 1 Jan 2024 and 30 Jun 2024 will be included.
Objective (c): Participants will be conveniently sampled after completion of the Health Risk Factor Assessment (HRFA) at DHC/DHC Express between 1 Jan 2024 and 31 Mar 2024 to complete surveys on self-reported outcomes. For the first survey at 3 months, a questionnaire will be used to assess participants' enablement level and experience during the screening phase. The second follow-up survey will be administered at 12 months to assess participants' experience in clinical encounters.
Objective (d): This will be a 1-year comparative cohort study including CDCC and non-CDCC participants to evaluate the effectiveness of the CDCC Pilot Scheme. A total of 264 CDCC participants, and 264 non-CDCC participants screened positive for HT, pre-DM, or DM will be included as intervention and comparison group, respectively. All participants will be followed up 12 months. Records for CDCC participants who meet the inclusion criteria between 1 Jan 2024 and 30 Apr 2024, will be extracted from the Electronic Health Record Sharing System database. Meanwhile, a convenient sample of 1,886 non-CDCC participants (comparison group) will be recruited from the community between 1 Jan 2024 and 30 Apr 2024.
Objective (e): This will be a 1-year comparative cohort study including CDCC and non-CDCC participants to evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of the CDCC Pilot Scheme. The total costs incurred on the CDCC Pilot Scheme from 1st January 2024 to 31st December 2024, including set-up costs, ongoing operational costs and ongoing administrative and maintenance costs will be collected via questionnaires. Direct medical costs for CDCC participants and non-CDCC participants will be collected after 12 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
of interventional group:
Exclusion criteria
of interventional group:
Inclusion criteria
of comparison group:
Exclusion criteria
of comparison group:
Participants will receive comprehensive health management plans and necessary medication treatment from family doctors, based on their clinical condition. Nurse clinic will provide disease prevention education, health assessment, and counselling services, whereas allied health professionals (including optometrists, podiatrists, dietitians, and physiotherapists) will provide individualized intervention services for participants.
Time frame: Characteristics of CDCC participants will be described at baseline
Characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, and medications of the CDCC participants. For continuous variables, age will be presented in years, blood pressure will be presented in millimeters of mercury, fasting glucose, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides will be presented in millimole per liter, weight in kilograms and height in meter will be combined to report body mass index (BMI) in kg/m^2, estimated glomerular filtration rate will be presented in milliliters per minute per 1.73m^2. For categorical variables, frequency and proportion will be used. participants. For continuous variables, age will be presented in years. For categorical variables, frequency and proportion will be used.
Time frame: Questionnaires will be implemented at 6 months and 12 months after the study begins
The standards (proportion of participants) achieved by the program in each of the criterion specified under each domain of quality of care according to the CDCC Pilot Scheme protocol. The questionnaire is developed based on the evaluation framework on structure, process and outcome. The percentage of adherence out of 100% based on pre-determined key performance indicators will be reported. A higher score means a greater adherence to the standards of care.
Time frame: 12 months
Participants' enablement will be measured by the Chinese Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) at 12 months following the enrolment into the CDCC Pilot Scheme
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in the proportion of CDCC participants achieving the target outcome of disease control after 12 months as compared with non-CDCC participants. Target outcomes of disease control are defined as below:
Time frame: 12 months
The additional costs incurred on the CDCC Pilot Scheme from healthcare providers' perspective estimated from the manpower and pay scale of staff reported in the questionnaire, as well as the cost for acquiring physical space, equipment, and other IT infrastructure needed for the program. Costs will be presented as absolute values (HKD and USD).
Time frame: 12 months
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per individual achieving the target outcome of disease control for the CDCC Pilot Scheme compared to the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) after 12 months
Time frame: Experience and satisfaction of CDCC participants will be evaluated at 3 months and 12 months after recruitment
Participants' experience and satisfaction of services provided by the CDCC Pilot Scheme will be measured by self-reported experience and enablement questionnaire. It includes the standardized Patient Enablement Index with a total score ranging from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate a better outcome. Other items were developed and adapted based on similar questionnaires. Patient experience and satisfaction levels will be assessed on a 4-point Likert scale with a higher score suggesting better satisfaction / experience.
Time frame: 12 months
Self-reported attendance to doctor consultation over the past 12 months for patients in comparison groups.
Time frame: 12 months
Self-reported diagnosis of HT and/or DM on dichotomous yes/no response over the past 12 months for patients in comparison groups.
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in the changes in mean HbA1c/fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to 12 months between pre-DM patients enrolled in the CDCC Pilot Scheme compared to comparison group.
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in the changes in mean SBP and DBP from baseline to 12 months between hypertension patients enrolled in the CDCC Pilot Scheme and comparison group.
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in the changes in mean of HbA1c from baseline to 12 months between DM patients enrolled in the CDCC Pilot Scheme and comparison group.
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in BMI from baseline to 12 months between patients enrolled in the CDCC Pilot Scheme compared to comparison group.
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in the rate of smoking cessation and rate of alcohol abstinence between two groups by the Health Risk Factor Assessment
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in the predicted 10-year CVD risk using Framingham Risk Score and local CVD risk prediction model between patients enrolled in the CDCC Pilot Scheme compared to comparison group. The Framingham Risk Score ranges from 0% to 100% where higher scores indicate poorer outcomes.
Time frame: 12 months
The direct medical costs of CDCC participants as compared with non-CDCC participants
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
The University of Hong Kong
Other
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Chronic Disease Co-Care (CDCC) Pilot Scheme: a Commissioned Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03098654
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
View Trial DetailsNCT04791267
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04790604
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05962372
Abdominal Obesity, Body Weight
San Juan, Puerto Rico
View Trial Details