Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry
Ankara, Yenimahalle, 06500, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06821932
Bacground: Implant failure may necessitate the need for another surgical procedure to improve implant survival. Photofunctionalization with UV is a practice that can positively affect dental implant success and osseointegration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the photofunctionalization process on the bone quality around the implant.
Methods: In the study, 42 implants were evaluated using the Fractal Analysis method from the panoramic radiographs taken before and after the implant. The analysis of the data was done with the SPSS 26 program and worked with a 95% confidence level. In the test group, there was a statistically significant difference between the 1st panoramic measurement and the 2nd panoramic measurement (p=0.044<0.05) and the bone fractal score increased.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, Yenimahalle, 06500, Turkey (Türkiye)
Bacground: Implant failure may necessitate the need for another surgical procedure to improve implant survival. Photofunctionalization with UV is a practice that can positively affect dental implant success and osseointegration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the photofunctionalization process on the bone quality around the implant.
Methods: In the study, 42 implants were evaluated using the Fractal Analysis method from the panoramic radiographs taken before and after the implant. The analysis of the data was done with the SPSS 26 program and worked with a 95% confidence level. In the test group, there was a statistically significant difference between the 1st panoramic measurement and the 2nd panoramic measurement (p=0.044<0.05) and the bone fractal score increased.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dental implants subjected to photofunctionalization were placed in the experimental area of the mouth.
Dental implants not subjected to photofunctionalization were placed in the bone on the contralateral side of the mouth
Time frame: 1 month
The bone fractal dimension (FB) values were determined by sizing the ROI to 25x25 pixels using the box counting method. The area of interest to be examined in the image was cropped and saved in 8-bit format. Different image processing methods were applied. For the fractal dimension calculation the box counting method was used. The number of squares containing trabeculae and the total number of squares in the image were determined for various pixel sizes. These values were plotted on a logarithmic scale, and the slope of the line that best fit the points on the graph determined the bone FB.
Ankara University
Other
Evaluation of the Bone Structure Surrounding Photofunctionalized Implants Using the Fractal Analysis Method: A Split-mouth Randomised Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07346391
Dental Implants
HỒ CHÍ MINH, VIỆT NAM, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT05722041
Dental Implants, Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Alicante, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07671456
Aggressive Periodontitis, Chronic Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT07608523
Dental Implants, Gingival Diseases
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details