Evaluation of the Addictive Potential of E-Cigarettes

fMRI to assess group differences in task-specific brain activation patterns using cue-reactivity task (Vollstädt-Klein et al. 2011)

fMRI to assess group differences in task-specific brain activation patterns using the MOTTA-task (Bühler et al. 2010);

measured with reaction time differences (in milliseconds) using the smoke-related dot-probe task (Vollstadt-Klein et al. 2011) in combination with eye tracking and fMRI to assess group differences in task-specific eye movement and brain activation patterns

measured with reaction time differences (in milliseconds) using the smoking-related implicit association task (Wiers et al. 2016).

[reaction time differences is not a change over time; it is measured during one experimental session]

Assessment of self-reported craving for cigarette smoking using Craving Automatized Scale for Cigarette Smoking (CAS-CS): adapted from CAS-A (Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2015). 5 subscales (factors): Factor 1 ("only aware in hindsight") ranges from 0 to 35, factor 2 ("no deliberate decision") from 0 to 35, factor 3 ("contrary to intention") from 0 to 40, factor 4 ("no perception") from 0 to 20, and factor 5 ("no control") from 0 to 10, higher score means more habitual smoking.

Assessment of self-reported craving for cigarette smoking using Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU, Müller et al. 2001); two subscales: "intention and desire to smoke / anticipation of pleasure from smoking" (range 11 - 77) and "anticipation of relief from negative affect and nicotine withdrawal / urgent and overwhelming desire to smoke" (range 10 - 70) high values represent high craving.

Assessment of self-reported craving for cigarette smoking using Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU, Müller et al. 2001); two subscales: "intention and desire to smoke / anticipation of pleasure from smoking" (range 11 - 77) and "anticipation of relief from negative affect and nicotine withdrawal / urgent and overwhelming desire to smoke" (range 10 - 70) high values represent high craving.

Assessment of self-reported craving for e-cigarettes using Craving Automatized Scale for Vaping (CAS-V): adapted from CAS-A (Vollstädt-Klein et al., 2015). 5 subscales (factors): Factor 1 ("only aware in hindsight") ranges from 0 to 35, factor 2 ("no deliberate decision") from 0 to 35, factor 3 ("contrary to intention") from 0 to 40, factor 4 ("no perception") from 0 to 20, and factor 5 ("no control") from 0 to 10, higher score means more habitual vaping.

Assessment of self-reported craving for e-cigarettes using Questionnaire of Vaping Craving (QVC; Dowd et al. 2018) 3 factors: Desire, Intention, Positive Outcome. Vaping craving ratings are made on a 7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree). high values represent high craving.

Assessment of self-reported craving for e-cigarettes using Questionnaire of Vaping Craving (QVC; Dowd et al. 2018) 3 factors: Desire, Intention, Positive Outcome. Vaping craving ratings are made on a 7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree). high values represent high craving.

Assessment of Withdrawal symptoms of (e-cigarette) smoking using Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (Welsch et al., 1999). 7 Subscales: anger, anxiety, concentration, craving, hunger, sadness, sleep. Each emotion is determined by the mean of each item that applies.

Assessment of Withdrawal symptoms of (e-cigarette) smoking using Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (Welsch et al., 1999). 7 Subscales: anger, anxiety, concentration, craving, hunger, sadness, sleep. Each emotion is determined by the mean of each item that applies.

Assessment of negative consequences of cigarette smoking using the Short Smoking Consequences Questionnaire (modified version of the SCQ (Brandon & Baker, 1991). Assesses cigarette smoking outcome expectancies among adolescents and young adults. 21-items, 10-point Likert scale (0=completely unlikely to 9=completely likely) to rate the likelihood of occurrence of each smoking consequence item. The four factors are consistent with the original SCQ subscales and include Negative Consequences (4 items), Positive Reinforcement (5 items), Negative Reinforcement (7 items), and Appetite-Weight Control (5 items). Higher scores stand for higher likelihood of consequences.

Assessment of negative consequences of vaping e-cigarettes using the Short Vaping Consequences Questionnaire (modified version of the SCQ (Brandon & Baker, 1991). Assesses vaping e-cigarette outcome expectancies among adolescents and young adults. 21-items, 10-point Likert scale (0=completely unlikely to 9=completely likely) to rate the likelihood of occurrence of each vaping consequence item. The four factors are consistent with the original SCQ subscales and include Negative Consequences (4 items), Positive Reinforcement (5 items), Negative Reinforcement (7 items), and Appetite-Weight Control (5 items). Higher scores stand for higher likelihood of consequences.