Victorian Heart Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Mary-Anne Austin
CONTACT
Stephen J Nicholls
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07091162
This study is a three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of using cardiac CT imaging or polygenic risk score in cardiovascular risk factor modification in patients with diabetes.
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia
Location status: Recruiting
Mary-Anne Austin
CONTACT
Stephen J Nicholls
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The contemporary management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) involves a multifaceted model of care integrating intensive management of lipids, blood pressure, and glucose, along with lifestyle modifications. Despite these efforts, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with T2D, largely due to suboptimal adherence to preventive strategies. The VOLTAIRE trial aims to assess the impact of providing personalised cardiovascular risk information derived from computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and a polygenic risk score (PRS) on cardiovascular risk factor modification.
VOLTAIRE evaluates whether integrating CTCA and PRS into risk counselling enhances adherence to lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, ultimately improving cardiovascular outcomes among patients with T2D.
VOLTAIRE is a prospective three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial aiming to enrol 90 participants aged 40 years or older with T2D and no established atherosclerotic CVD. Participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive: (1) risk factor counselling plus CTCA result, (2) risk factor counselling plus PRS result or (3) standard risk factor counselling (control). Nurse-led motivational interviewing will be used for risk counselling. The primary outcome is change in non-calcified plaque volume measured by serial CTCA at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, adherence to medication, patient engagement, CVD knowledge improvements, and psychological outcomes over 12 months.
VOLTAIRE seeks to determine if coupling nurse-led risk factor counselling with personalised CTCA or PRS information improves cardiovascular outcomes, adherence, and participant engagement in T2D management.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants who are assigned to CTCA group will receive their CTCA results
Participants who are assigned to PRS group will receive their PRS results
Time frame: From baseline CT to the end of study at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Intensification of lipid-lowering therapy at 12 months will be defined as the occurrence of any of the following:
This outcome will be assessed based on medication records at the 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: 12 months
Medication adherence will be assessed using a participant-reported item from a modified VOILS questionnaire at the 12-month follow-up. Participants are asked:
"In the last week, I took my tablet(s):" with response options:
Adherence will be defined as selecting "Every day", and the number of participants meeting this criterion will be reported.
Time frame: 12 months
Patient activation and engagement in care will be assessed using the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at baseline and 12 months. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (Disagree Strongly to Agree Strongly), with responses converted into a continuous score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate greater activation, reflecting better self-management and engagement in health care.
Time frame: 12 months
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), producing a total score from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. A higher score represents a worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Anxiety will be assessed using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), yielding a total score from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity. A higher score represents a worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Diabetes distress will be assessed using the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17). Each item is scored on a 6-point Likert scale from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (a very serious problem). Mean item scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater distress. A higher score represents a worse outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, which includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has five response levels, ranging from no problems to extreme problems. Responses will be converted into a health utility index score using the Australian-specific value set, ranging from <0 (worse than death) to 1 (perfect health). A higher utility score indicates better health status and quality of life.
Time frame: 12 months
Risk of obstructive sleep apnea will be assessed using the STOP-BANG questionnaire at baseline and 12 months. The tool includes 8 yes/no items: Snoring; Tiredness; Observed apnoea; High blood Pressure; Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m²; Age >50 years; Neck circumference >40 cm; Gender (male)
Each "yes" is scored as 1 point, giving a total score from 0 to 8. Scores of: 0-2 = low risk; 3-4 = intermediate risk; 5-8 = high risk
Higher scores indicate a higher risk of obstructive sleep apnea. Change in total STOP-BANG score will be reported.
Time frame: 12 months
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk will be assessed using the New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes (NZSSD) CVD Risk Assessment Calculator (www.nzssd.org.nz/cvd/). This tool estimates the 5-year absolute risk of a cardiovascular event based on patient characteristics, including age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, diabetes status, blood pressure, lipids, and other clinical parameters.
The calculator produces a score between 0% and >30%, with higher scores indicating greater risk.
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
This composite outcome reflects the number of participants who meet all of the following three modifiable risk factor goals at 12 months:
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Total atheroma volume (in mm³) will be assessed by CTCA at baseline and 12 months. TAV quantifies plaque burden in the coronary arteries. A higher TAV indicates more atherosclerotic plaque.
Time frame: 12 months
Calcified plaque volume (in mm³) will be measured using CTCA at baseline and 12 months. It represents the volume of calcium-containing plaque within the coronary arteries. A higher volume indicates greater calcified atherosclerotic burden.
Time frame: 12 months
PCAT attenuation will be measured in Hounsfield Units (HU) using CTCA. It reflects the inflammatory status of perivascular fat. Higher values are associated with greater coronary inflammation.
Time frame: 12 months
Appropriateness will be assessed using a custom participant survey and focus group interviews. Participants will rate whether they found the CTCA intervention relevant and suitable for their personal health needs. Responses will be summarised using Likert scales and thematic analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Feasibility will be assessed through participant survey items and focus group discussions addressing clarity of instructions. Responses will be summarised using Likert scales and thematic analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Acceptability will be measured using participant survey and focus group feedback on comfort, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo CTCA again. Ratings will be reported using Likert scales and thematic analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Appropriateness will be assessed using a custom participant survey and focus group interviews. Participants will rate whether they found the PRS intervention relevant and suitable for their personal health needs. Responses will be summarised using Likert scales and thematic analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Feasibility will be assessed through participant survey items and focus group discussions addressing clarity of instructions. Responses will be summarised using Likert scales and thematic analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Acceptability will be measured using participant survey and focus group feedback on comfort, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo PRS testing again. Ratings will be reported using Likert scales and thematic analysis.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Monash University
Other
Acronym: VOLTAIRE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07106879
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Brooklyn, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07026539
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Aarhus N, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07691203
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Ahmedabad, Sarkhej, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06735859
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Santos, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details