Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascan
Villeurbanne, 69100, France
NCT Number: NCT05747690
The clinical investigation is designed to primarily confirm the performance of KIO015 in improving the GAIS assessment, a subjective parameter, including skin roughness. A non-treated zone (untreated hemi-face) was used as comparator for exact evaluation of the zones between the treated and untreated ones The safety of KIO015 was also evaluated for confirmation of initial data.
For this purpose, 78 healthy subjects were injected in half of the face. In KIO015-PLUM, healthy subjects with signs of cutaneous aging and dehydrated skin on the face received either one or three dermal injections:
* Cohort 1: one intradermal injection session of KIO015 device on M0, to evaluate the effect of a single injection session * Cohort 2: three intradermal injection sessions of KIO015 device on M0, M1 and M2, to evaluate the effect of 3 injection sessions as performed for state-of-the-art products.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Villeurbanne, 69100, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In terms of population
In terms of associated pathology
Innovative carboxymethyl chitosan-based biomaterial intended for intradermal injection
Time frame: 1 month after the first intradermal injection for both cohorts.
Clinical evaluation of global aesthetic improvement of the treated area with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) evaluated by the investigator. Comparison to a non-treated zone.
Time frame: 1 month after the first intradermal injection
Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) after each injection session.
For each cohort, change from baseline of epidermis hydration of the treated zone measured with Corneometer®
Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) after each injection session.
For each cohort, change from baseline of dermis hydration of the treated zone measured with Moisturemeter D®
Time frame: 7 days (cohort 1 only), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after each injection session.
For each cohort, change from baseline of skin oxidative stress from skin superficial sampling on the treated area at the different time points and comparison to a non-treated zone.
Time frame: At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after the last injection session in both cohorts
Comparison of both cohorts for the change from baseline compared to a non-treated zone of Corneometer®
Time frame: At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after the last injection session in both cohorts
Comparison of both cohorts for the change from baseline compared to a non-treated zone of Moisturemeter®
Time frame: At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the last injection session in both cohorts
Comparison of both cohorts for Change from baseline of skin oxidative stress compared to a non-treated zone
Time frame: 1 month after the first injection
Time frame: 1 month after the first injection
Time frame: 7 days, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only) after each injection session.
Clinical evaluation of global aesthetic improvement of the treated area with GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) evaluated by the investigator. Comparison to a non-treated zone.
Time frame: Immediately after the injection session.
Evaluation of pain felt by the subject using a subjective evaluation questionnaire on skin improvement of the treated area.
Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only)
Evaluation of subject satisfaction using a subjective evaluation questionnaire on skin improvement of the treated area.
Time frame: At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the last injection session in both cohorts
Comparison of percentage of subjects with an improvement of the GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) of the treated area, evaluated by the investigator between cohort 1 and 2
Time frame: At 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after the last injection session in both cohorts
Comparison of percentage of satisfied subjects using a subjective evaluation questionnaire on skin improvement of the treated area between cohort 1 and 2
Time frame: Immediately after the injection sessions
Evaluation of the appreciation of the injection quality using a subjective evaluation questionnaire completed by the injectors
Time frame: 7 days, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months (cohort 1 only)
Percentage of injection site reactions recorded by the investigator
Time frame: During 30 days after each injection session.
Evaluation of the duration and severity of the injection site reactions by the subject recorded in a diary.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 12 months
Collection of adverse events and concomitant treatments
Time frame: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months
Comparison of the two sub-groups using different needles (30G and 32G)
Kiomed Pharma
Industry
A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Face Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance and Safety of Intradermal Injection of KIO015 for Tissue Filling in Subjects With Signs of Cutaneous Dehydration on the Face
Acronym: PLUM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06774742
Lips Quality, Persistence of the Effect
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06850935
Erythema, Melanin Hyperpigmentation
Taichung, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT03424161
Skin Quality
Brisbane, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04172740
Skin Quality
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details