NCT Number: NCT00391846
Evaluation of Heart Failure Treatment Guided by N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) vs Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone
The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
Research Site, Alvesta, Sweden
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Female/male, over 18 years with previously verified HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- New York Heart Association(NYHA) class II-IV,
- NTproBNP males>800 ng/L, females >1000 ng/L
Exclusion criteria
- Planned CV hospitalisation, stroke or acute myocardial infarction (MI) last 3 months,
- Mitral/aortic stenosis,
- Patients already receiving optimal HF treatment,
- Severe reduction of kidney function
Treatment and study plan
Enalapril
DrugLisinopril
DrugRamipril
Drugtrandolapril
DrugBisoprolol
DrugCarvedilol
DrugMetoprolol succinate
DrugCandesartan
DrugOther names: Atacand
valsartan
DrugEplerenone
DrugSpironolactone
DrugDiuretics
DrugHF treatment according to Swedish guidelines
DrugBlood samples
ProcedureThe Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)
Time frame: 9 months
The non-parametric scale is constructed from 3 variables, modified after Cleland. Each patient receives a rank score from 1 to 246 (246-number of patients in the study). The lowest score receive patients who die (due to CV event), next patients still alive at end-of-study with the worst composite score, the best alive patients with 0 days in hospital and the largest improvement in the KCCQ (self-administered by patient symptom score, where the higher score reflect better health status). Scores will be summarized using non-parametric calculations. The mean of non-parametric scores is presented
Secondary outcomes
-
Number of CV Deaths
Time frame: 9 months
Number of deaths
-
Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason
Time frame: 9 months
Each overnight stay is counted as one day. The lower the better
-
Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Changes from baseline in the symptom score subset (question 3, 5, 7 and 9) of KCCQ (swelling, fatigue, shortness of breath, shortness of breath night time). KCCQ is a self-administered by patient symptom score, where higher score reflect better health status. Scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100. This mean that the KCCQ scale is from 0 to 100 with the higher value showing a better health status.
-
Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
The 95% confidential interval (CI) is given as measure of dispersion
-
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
Time frame: 9 months and baseline
Change range -100 to 100. The higher the better.
-
Total Number of Titration Steps in Prescribed Heart Failure Treatment
Time frame: 9 months
Each titration step in prescribed medication is counted as one step, either up or down. One step up indicates an increase of dose in prescribed medication and one step down indicates a decrease of dose in prescribed medication. The sum of steps is given as a score. Score is given for each arm as a total number of titration steps for all patients in arm.
-
Discontinuations
Time frame: 9 months
Number of patients discontinued due to adverse events'
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomised, Single Blind, Multicentre, 9-month, Phase IV Study, Comparing Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs and NT-proBNP vs Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone, in Patients With Heart Failure (HF) and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Important dates
- Study start
- 2006
- Primary completion
- 2009
- Study completion
- 2009
- First posted
- Oct 25, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Jun 25, 2012
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Non-Invasive and Invasive Assessment of Heart Filling Pressure
NCT07512310
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Essen, Germany
View Trial DetailsElectrical Stimulation Improves Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure on Continuous Dobutamine Use
NCT02668419
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsEffects of Viagra on Heart Function in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT00781508
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsSTEPwise De-escalation and Optimizing Withdrawal of ARNI and SGLT2i in Normalized Heart Failure
NCT07631156
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Daegu, South Korea
View Trial Details