Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Somashekar G. Krishna, MD
CONTACT
Somashekar G. Krishna, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT05961982
This clinical trial evaluates the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for the management of patients with pancreatic tumors (including cysts) performed during recommended surveillance endoscopic ultrasound examinations. Pancreatic tumors (cysts) can progress to pancreatic cancer at rate of more than 25% per year risk. Pancreatic cancer is a fatal disease that is difficult to diagnose at an early stage, and the five-year survival rate is currently less than 10%. It is projected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by the year 2030. A procedure known as radiofrequency ablation may help. Radiofrequency ablation is an established way to treat benign and cancerous tumors in the human body. In the last 5 years, radiofrequency ablation has been applied to treat precancerous tumors (including cysts) in the pancreas. This procedure implements a medical technology that destroys tumors in a much less invasive way compared to traditional surgical removal. By delivering a high-frequency alternating current, radiofrequency ablation uses electrical energy and heat to destroy cancer cells. Radiofrequency ablation is being recognized as a management option in patients with high-risk pancreatic tumors (cysts) but are not deemed surgical candidates. While surgical removal offers a chance of cure, pancreatic surgeries have 20-40% morbidity rate (short and long-term complication) and a 1-2% mortality rate in patients who are surgical candidates. Furthermore, radiofrequency ablation can potentially decrease the need for frequent imaging/surveillance of the pancreatic tumor (cyst). In patients with immediate prohibitive, but reversible risks for surgery, radiofrequency ablation of a high-risk tumors (cysts) can potentially prevent further progression of the lesion and bridge the time before the need for surgical resection.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Somashekar G. Krishna, MD
CONTACT
Somashekar G. Krishna, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess the efficacy of EUS-RFA of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the safety of EUS-guided RFA of PCNs. II. To assess the long-term response to EUS-RFA.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo standard of care EUS-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) followed by EUS-RFA on study and may undergo repeat EUS-RFA or EUS-guided chemoablation during surveillance. Patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), computed tomography (CT), or EUS-FNA at baseline and at follow-up timepoints.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3-6 months for cysts >= 3 cm or every 6-12 months for cysts < 3 cm for up to 3 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo EUS-guided chemoablation
Other names: ABLATION, CHEMICAL
Undergo CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Ancillary studies
Undergo EUS-FNA
Other names: endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, EUS-FNA
Undergo EUS-RFA
Other names: EUS-RFA
Undergo MRI/MRCP
Other names: MRCP
Undergo MRI/MRCP
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time frame: At 1 years after EUS-RFA
Defined as at least a 50% decrease in the cyst diameter. Other markers of response to EUS-RFA will be evaluated by cross-sectional imaging and EUS: change in the diameter, morphology of cyst - fibrosis, septations, loculations, wall thickness, intracystic or mural nodules; cyst fluid aspiration (biopsy if there is fibrosis): next generation sequencing (NGS) - persistence or absence of mutations (molecular markers), cytology - results can include either: mucin, atypical/suspicious cells, necrotic material, or inflammatory debris, experimental: flow cytometry for immunological markers of antineoplastic response; serological changes: chromogranin A (for cystic-neuroendocrine tumor), and serum cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 (if elevated prior to intervention).
Time frame: At 2 and 3 years after EUS-RFA
Defined as at least a 50% decrease in the cyst diameter. Durable response: Continued response with further decrease in cyst diameter beyond the first calendar year. The response will be evaluated by cross-sectional imaging and EUS: change in the diameter, morphology of cyst - fibrosis, septations, loculations, wall thickness, intracystic or mural nodules; cyst fluid aspiration (biopsy if there is fibrosis): NGS - persistence or absence of mutations (molecular markers), cytology - results can include either: mucin, atypical/suspicious cells, necrotic material, or inflammatory debris, experimental: flow cytometry for immunological markers of antineoplastic response; serological changes: chromogranin A (for cystic-neuroendocrine tumor), and serum CA 19-9 (if elevated prior to intervention).
Time frame: Post-procedure (after EUS-RFA)
Documented using the adverse events in gastrointestinal endoscopy classification for adverse events in gastrointestinal advanced endoscopy. Only grade II or higher degree of complications will be documented since patients are electively admitted after EUS-RFA for overnight observation. If patient has post-procedure acute pancreatitis, document severity based on Revised Atlanta Classification.
Time frame: at one year after EUS-RFA
Documented using the adverse events in gastrointestinal endoscopy classification for adverse events in gastrointestinal advanced endoscopy. Only grade II or higher degree of complications will be documented since patients are electively admitted after EUS-RFA for overnight observation. If patient has post-procedure acute pancreatitis, document severity based on Revised Atlanta Classification.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Pancreatic Cysts - A Safety and Efficacy Trial (ERASE Study)
Acronym: ERASE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06400472
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04239573
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06051695
Adenoma, Adnexal Diseases
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06122896
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details