Biopsy Procedure
ProcedureUndergo biopsy
Other names: Biopsy, BIOPSY_TYPE, Bx
NCT Number: NCT04239573
The purpose of this study is to compare two approaches for monitoring pancreatic cysts as well as to identify associated biomarkers. The study doctors want to compare more frequent monitoring versus less frequent monitoring as well as identify biomarkers which may improve risk detection of transformation to pancreatic cancer. The study doctors want to learn which monitoring method and which biomarkers lead to better outcomes for patients.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Evaluate whether the protocol specified primary biomarkers (both blood and imaging-based) measured at baseline, are associated with the future development of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate whether the imaging-based secondary biomarker implemented using baseline computed tomography (CT) scans and/or the blood-based secondary biomarker panel, is associated with the future development of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata.
II. Estimate area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive value of each biomarker.
III. Evaluate the predictive ability of the longitudinal trajectory of each biomarker for prediction of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata.
IV. Develop and evaluate risk scores that combine blood-based and imaging-based markers.
V. Compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between study arms (A and B): quality of life (QOL), financial distress, and situational anxiety.
VI. Compare 5-year total cost between arms (A and B).
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024):
I. To compare the rates of unfavorable clinical outcomes in the two arms.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024):
I. To compare rates of major surgical morbidity and/or mortality between arms. II. To compare pancreatic cancer incidence and all-cause mortality across arms. III. Compare institutional (direct) costs. IV. Compare healthcare utilization of imaging, invasive testing, surgical, and other procedures across the two surveillance arms.
V. Compare patient (out-of-pocket and other indirect) costs. VI. Describe diagnostic test and treatment pathways by arm. VII. Compare patient reports of QOL, situational anxiety. VIII. Compare patient report of financial distress. IX. Compare rates of non-adherence by arm assignment. X. To evaluate and compare the predictive performance of known and future biomarkers for dysplasia or cancer.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024):
I. To evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of known and future radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer.
OUTLINE: This is an observational study.
Patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT scans as well as blood sample collection throughout the trial. Patients undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), fine needle aspiration (FNA), biopsy and surgery as clinically indicated.
Patients are followed up every 6 months or yearly for 5 years from the date of registration.
OUTLINE (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024): This is an observational study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A (LOW INTENSITY SURVEILLANCE) (CLOSED TO ACCRUAL 08/13/2024): Patients undergo MRI, CT, or EUS at the beginning of the trial and MRI or CT again in 1 year. Following the first year, patients with no abnormalities repeat MRI or CT every 2 years. Patients with positive imaging features on MRI and CT at 1 or 2 years and with negative EUS, repeat MRI or CT in 1 year. Patients with negative imaging repeat MRI or CT in 2 years.
ARM B (HIGH INTENSITY SURVEILLANCE) (CLOSED TO ACCRUAL 08/13/2024): Patients undergo MRI, CT, or EUS at the beginning of the trial. Patients with >= 1 and < 2 cm cyst undergo MRI or CT every 6 months for 1 year, then every 12 months for 2 years, and then every 24 months thereafter. Patients with >= 2 and < 3 cm cyst undergo EUS within 6 months, and if EUS is negative, patients repeat MRI or CT in 1 year. If second EUS is negative, patients undergo alternate MRI or CT and EUS every 12 months. Patients with cyst >= 3 cm undergo alternate MRI or CT with EUS every 3-6 months.
All patients may also optionally undergo blood sample collection, biopsy and/or EUS-FNA on study.
After completion of imaging procedures, patients are followed up for 5 years from the date of registration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo biopsy
Other names: Biopsy, BIOPSY_TYPE, Bx
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo CT
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan, Diagnostic CAT Scan Service Type, tomography
Undergo EUS
Other names: endosonography, EUS
Undergo EUS-FNA
Other names: endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, EUS-FNA
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Ancillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Undergo surgery
Other names: Operation, Surgery, Surgery Type, Surgery, NOS, Surgical, Surgical Intervention, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Procedures, Type of Surgery
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will assess the predictive performance of both primary markers separately. Time to first occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata will be measured from the time of baseline blood draw. Will use an overall significance level of 0.1. Will use a Bonferroni correction for multiplicity adjustment, the significance level applied to both primary biomarkers will be 0.05. Will evaluate using a two-sided log-rank test comparing time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata between the marker-positive and marker-negative subgroups. Will visually summarize time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata in both maker positive and marker negative using Kaplan-Meier curves. All biomarkers will come in with a predetermined threshold for determining marker positivity (as defined in their respective publications). The primary imaging marker is for MRI, the analysis of this biomarker will be restricted to participants with a pre-enrollment MRI.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Defined as a composite of: (1) any pancreatic cancer without surgery; (2) unresectable pancreatic cancer or cancer > T1a, N0 at surgery, and (3) benign disease at surgery will be approached from the intent-to-treat perspective. Time to the first occurrence of the primary endpoint will be measured from randomization. Survival analysis methods will be used to estimate and compare distributions of time to an unfavorable event between the study arms. In particular Kaplan-Meier estimates will be developed for each arm and a log rank test will be used to compare the two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will evaluate with the analog analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety 4-item short form. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare situational anxiety between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be measured using the PROMIS-10. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare quality of life between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measure. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. Will compare financial distress between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will evaluate the sum of Medicare reimbursement for all the healthcare utilization. Will compare total cost between arms. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. The distribution of the cost will be examined. If it is approximately normal, then the cost between the arms will be compared using a t-test. Also, the variance in the cost will be compared to assess if it differs between the arms. If distribution is particularly skewed a transformation will be sought, and the comparison will be analyzed on that scale.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Rates of major surgical morbidity and/or mortality will be estimated and compared across arms. All-cause mortality will be estimated and compared between the arms using log rank tests.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Rates of major surgical morbidity and/or mortality will be estimated and compared across arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Pancreatic-cancer incidence and pancreatic cancer specific mortality will be estimated and compared between the arms using log rank tests.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will compare between two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will compare between two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will compare between two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will describe diagnostic test and treatment pathways by arm.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be assessed by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System10. Will compare between arms. Longitudinal regression modelling will be completed to account for the repeated assessments over time.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be assessed by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Anxiety short form. Will compare between arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will compare between arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will compare rates of non-adherence by arm assignment.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will evaluate and compare the predictive performance of known and future biomarkers for dysplasia or cancer.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of known and future radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Network
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06400472
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06051695
Adenoma, Adnexal Diseases
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06122896
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05687123
Adenoma, Adenoma, Islet Cell
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details