Effect of GMI With and Without NM on LE in Cancer Patients With CIPN
NCT07712302
Ataxia, Cancer
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT07304401
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy for treatment of painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.
The closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) system stimulates the nerves in the spinal cord, measures their responses and automatically adjust the stimulation level accordingly in real time for each delivered pulse.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a serious condition that is diagnosed in up to 40% of patients who require chemotherapy. Conventional treatments for painful CIPN include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, although the underlying evidence is scarce. Spinal cord stimulation is an established treatment for pain associated with painful peripheral neuropathies. Several studies demonstrate pain relief by open-loop spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with painful CIPN, with a positive effect of SCS on pain and quality of life. In the Netherlands, CIPN is an accepted indication for SCS treatment and thus SCS is a regular treatment for patients with painful and refractory CIPN. The closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) system stimulates the dorsal column in the spinal cord, measures the response through evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), and automatically adjust the stimulation level accordingly in real time for each delivered pulse.
The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy in patients with CIPN.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: The difference between baseline and the evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
The primary effectiveness outcome measure is pain intensity measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
Time frame: The difference between baseline and the evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
Pain intensity for the arms and/or legs measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: The difference between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
Assessment of quality of life in seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) all assessed using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. PROMIS-29 is scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the U.S. general population, with a higher score representing more symptoms.
Time frame: The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
Assessment of CIPN-related symptoms using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20).
EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 contains 20 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale for sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms. Scale scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating increased symptoms.
Time frame: The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with closed-loop SCS
Assessment of pain medication use
Time frame: The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
Assessment of the patient impression of global improvement with treatment using a 7-point rating scale, ranging from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate a patient perspective of a worsening of the health condition.
Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation
Assessment of the percentage of stimulation coverage of the painful area, and of stimulation sensation (awareness and quality) during closed-loop spinal cord stimulator (CL-SCS) therapy
Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
The pulse width in milliseconds of the active SCS stimulation program will be collected.
Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
Frequency of the active SCS stimulation program measured in Hertz will be collected
Time frame: Evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation
Assessment of treatment-related complications
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rijnstate Hospital
Other
Assessment of Effectiveness of Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy on Pain Reduction and Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Acronym: CIPRESS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07712302
Ataxia, Cancer
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07142304
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
Poway, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06614322
Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPN)
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06964802
Breast Cancer Patients, Breast Diseases
Istanbul, Uskudar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details