Valve replacement
ProcedureAortic valve replacement
NCT Number: NCT03453567
This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of aortic valve replacement in real-world clinical practice.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me19 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Sejong Hospital, Bucheon-si, South Korea
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Aortic valve replacement
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 5 years
A. Death due to proximate cardiac cause B. Death caused by noncoronary vascular condition C. All procedure-related/surgery-related death D. All valve-related death E. Sudden or unwitnessed death F. Death of unknown cause
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Operation site complication Vascular access site and access-related complication
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
A. Conversion to open surgery B. Coronary obstruction C. Mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction D. Cardiac tamponade E. Endocarditis F. Valve thrombosis G. Valve malpositioning H. TAV-in-TAV deployment
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
A. Prosthetic aortic valve stenosis B. Prosthesis-patient mismatch C. Prosthetic aortic valve regurgitation
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
A. Device success B. Early safety (30 days)
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 5 years
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Aortic valve area measured by echocardiography (mm2)
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year
Seung-Jung Park
Other
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Aortic Valve Replacement in Routine Clinical Practice; A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
Acronym: IRIS AVR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05758909
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
A Coruña, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05162742
Aortic Valve Calcification, Aortic Valve Disease
Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05295628
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03444259
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Turku, Finland
View Trial Details