IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, 40136, Italy
NCT Number: NCT06091488
The purpose of this study is to evaluate subjective and objective clinical outcomes and imaging data of subjects undergoing reconstruction or revision of LCA reconstruction using OrthoPure XT
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bologna, 40136, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in the patient.
Time frame: At baseline (day 0)
The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)
Time frame: After 2 months
The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)
Time frame: After 6 months
The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)
Time frame: After 24 months
The score goes from 0 to 100 where the maximum is 100 and expresses the absence of limitations and symptoms, and therefore an excellent result; the further you go from this score and the worse the result, which can therefore be divided into four groups: excellent (80-100)good (60-80), good (30-60), bad (0-30)
Time frame: At baseline (day 0)
The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).
Time frame: After 2 months
The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).
Time frame: After 6 months
The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).
Time frame: After 24 months
The final score is obtained from the sum of the various scores obtained in the different and ranges from 0 to 100.
Scores are divided into subgroups: Excellent (95-100); Good (84-94); Decent (65-83); Poor (<64).
Time frame: At baseline (day 0)
is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Time frame: After 2 months
is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Time frame: After 6 months
is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Time frame: After 24 months
is a one-dimensional quantitative pain assessment scale at 10 points; the scale requires the patient to select the number that best describes the intensity of his pain, from 0 to 10, at that precise moment. 0 means no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Time frame: At baseline (day 0)
allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports
Time frame: After 2 months
allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports
Time frame: After 6 months
allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports
Time frame: After 24 months
allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10, where 0 represents 'inability' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports
Time frame: After 24 months
assess the continuity of the graft with magnetic resonance imaging
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03462823
ACL, ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06167343
ACL, ACL Injury
Granada, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06529679
ACL, ACL Injury
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05876013
ACL, ACL Injury
Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway
View Trial Details