Riga Stradins University Institute of Stomatology
Riga, LV-1007, Latvia
NCT Number: NCT06734962
The study examines the impact of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) on bone regeneration in apical surgery compared to standard methods. It highlights the effectiveness of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for assessing periapical lesions. Eligible participants were adults with specific periapical lesions following root canal treatment failures. Exclusions included patients outside specific criteria, like those with advanced periodontal disease or undergoing orthodontic treatment. Participants were randomized into two groups: one receiving A-PRF to enhance bone regeneration and a control group without it. Both groups underwent apical surgery under magnification, with different postoperative protocols. The study involved radiological and ultrasonographic evaluations of lesion size and bone healing at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, alongside blood analyses for Vitamin D and cholesterol level to assess their potential impact on healing.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Riga, LV-1007, Latvia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will undergo an apical surgery procedure using A-PRF. Before the surgery and at follow-ups, patients will undergo comprehensive evaluation using clinical, radiological, and ultrasonographic techniques.
Participants will undergo an apical surgery procedure without using A-PRF. Patients will undergo comprehensive evaluation before the surgery and at follow-ups using clinical, radiological, and ultrasonographic techniques.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 month
Volumetric analysis of CBCT images will segment the defect in axial, sagittal, and coronal views. Bone volume will be measured in cubic millimeters (mm³) at pre-operative, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups and compared between each other. Where 0 is - no periapical lesion/periapical lesion healed.
Time frame: Baseline
During the baseline assessment, the dimensions of periapical lesions will be measured in millimeters and using the classification:
Category 1: no discernible periapical lesion was identified; Category 2: a periapical lesion was possibly present, however, the distinction was equivocal; Category 3: a periapical lesion was definitively observed. not unequivocal; Category 3: a periapical lesion was definitively observed. These measurements will then be analyzed in relation to images obtained through periapical radiography as well as those from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This comparison aims to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of different imaging techniques in assessing the size of periapical lesions.
Riga Stradins University
Other
Acronym: EBRAAPUU
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07092488
Necrotic Immature Permanent Teeth, Periapical Lesions
Zagreb, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT07019298
Dental Pulp Diseases, Jaw Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06906315
Dental Pulp Diseases, Dental Pulp Necrosis
Salamanca, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06587048
Chronic Apical Periodontitis of Pulpal Origin, Periapical Lesions
Rohtak, Haryana, India
View Trial Details