Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Madrid, Spain, 28922
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07019298
The present study aims to compare the radiographic success of endodontic treatment using Orstavik's criteria between two sealers: AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and Neosealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida, USA), as well as between two obturation techniques: continuous wave and single cone. The study includes 270 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Clinical and radiographic variables will be assessed, including quality of obturation, lesion healing, and restoration. The study seeks to determine if the use of bioceramic sealer is effective regardless of the obturation technique used, highlighting the importance of clinical follow-up to evaluate endodontic treatment success.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, Spain, 28922
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients aged 18 years and older. Teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis. Informed consent provided for data usage.
Exclusion criteria
Root canal obturation using AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA), a resin-based sealer with low solubility and shrinkage. Used in combination with gutta-percha for root canal filling.
Root canal obturation using NeoSealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Houston, TX, USA), a premixed bioceramic sealer based on calcium silicate. Used in combination with gutta-percha to enhance apical healing and biocompatibility.
A warm vertical compaction technique using heat-softened gutta-percha to obturate the canal in three dimensions. Considered the gold standard for achieving dense and homogenous root canal fillings.
A cold hydraulic condensation technique using a single gutta-percha cone matched to the last rotary file, combined with a high-flow sealer. Designed for simplified obturation with minimal operator variability.
Time frame: Minimum 6 months after root canal treatment
Radiographic outcome will be assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI) by Ørstavik et al. (1986), which categorizes periapical healing from 1 (normal periapical structures) to 5 (severe apical periodontitis).
Success is defined as PAI scores of 1 or 2 (complete healing or healing in progress).
Evaluations will be based on periapical radiographs (and CBCT when available) taken at follow-up after at least 6 months.
The assessment will be performed by a calibrated blinded evaluator using reference radiographs.
Time frame: Minimum 6 months after treatment
Clinical success will be defined by the absence of pain, tenderness to percussion or palpation, swelling, mobility, and other signs of persistent infection.
These parameters will be evaluated through standard clinical examination during follow-up visits.
Time frame: Minimum 6 months after treatment
When available, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images will be used to assess periapical healing.
A modified periapical index (PAI-CBCT) will be used, evaluating the presence, size, and resolution of periapical radiolucencies.
Lesion healing will be interpreted as success if there is full resolution or significant reduction in size compared to baseline.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Siena
Other
Evaluation of the Success Rate of Endodontic Treatment Using Different Obturation Techniques and Root Canal Sealer Cements: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07018284
Dental Pulp Diseases, Jaw Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07418840
Dental Pulp Diseases, Jaw Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT03708081
Dental Pulp Diseases, Dental Pulp Necrosis
Zonguldak, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06767371
Apical Periodontitis, Dental Pulp Diseases
Cairo, Obour, Egypt
View Trial Details