University of Foggia
Foggia, 71122, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07269990
The maxillary bone atrophies from traumatic, pathological events or related to physiological bone loss after tooth extraction, promoting a decrease in bone volume (vertical-horizontal) which has always been a crucial challenge for the clinician in order to obtain adequate rehabilitations prosthetics.
The results of bone loss induced aesthetic and functional difficulties in achieving surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of the right dental implant.
Bone loss can be restored with autologous bone grafts and in large bone atrophy of the jaws require complex surgical techniques such as vascularized bone transplantation.
As an alternative to the reconstruction of the maxillary tissue, several surgical techniques have been promoted to prevent or minimize bone resorption through market biomaterials with or without the patient's autologous bone.
To reduce or counteract biological bone resorption, surgeons have promoted alveolar cavity preservation procedures (ASP) with autologous or heterologous graft materials.
Recently, several studies have been published to evaluate the use of demineralized dentin material derived from the extracted tooth to obtain new bone in the maxillary post-extraction site.
The aim of the study is to compare different types of biomaterials 4 months after application through the use of the alveolar socket preservation technique.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Foggia, 71122, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The aim is to compare different types of biomaterials 4 months after application through the use of ASP in Group 1
The aim is to compare different types of biomaterials 4 months after application through the use of ASP in Group 2
The aim is to compare different types of biomaterials 4 months after application through the use of ASP in Group 3
The aim is to compare different types of biomaterials 4 months after application through the use of ASP in Group 4
Time frame: 4 months after surgery
University of Foggia
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06840639
Extracting Own Teeth, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06150456
Bone Substitutes, Extracting Own Teeth
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details