Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01036438

Evaluating the Efficacy of an Absorbent Foam Dressing Containing Silver (Mepilex Ag) Versus the Same Dressing Without Silver Used on Subjects With Venous Leg Ulcers or Mixed Ulcers

Compare the efficacy of using an absorbent foam silver dressing (Mepilex Ag) versus the equivalent dressing without silver in subjects suffering from venous leg ulcer or mixed ulcer with an ABPI ≥ 0.8 and with inflammatory signs. Efficacy will be defined as absolute wound size reduction.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Nemocnice Jihlava, Jihlava, Czechia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with colonised/ local infection in a venous leg ulcer or mixed leg ulcer with an ABPI ≥ 0,8 and < 1.3
  • A history of an appropriate compression therapy for at least 2 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Subjects with colonised/local infection presenting with three of five following specified signs:
  • pain between dressing changes
  • exuding wounds
  • erythema on peri-wound skin
  • oedema
  • odour
  • An ulcer size of at least 4 cm2 and a maximum size witch could be covered by one investigational product of 15x15 cm.
  • Ulcer duration 6 weeks to 1 year
  • In case of multiple ulcers: target ulcer must be at least 3 cm distant from other ulcers.
  • Both gender with an age ≥ 18 years
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • > 10% necrotic (black) or fibrinous (yellow) tissue covering the wound bed
  • Infected wounds in need of systemic antibiotic treatment
  • Use of anti-microbial dressings or topical agents such as antiseptics, local antibiotics and steroids within 7 days from inclusion on the wound intended to be included
  • Previous treatment with silver product 2 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Previous treatment with MepilexAg® on the target ulcer
  • Use of systemic antibiotics for any reason during the previous 7 days
  • Venous surgery 2 weeks prior to inclusion or planned surgery within 8 weeks after inclusion
  • Diagnosed underlying disease(s) (e.g. HIV/AIDS, cancer/malignancy and severe anaemia) judged by the investigator to be a potential interference in the wound evaluation
  • Subjects with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus i.e. HbA1c >8%
  • Subjects treated with systemic immunosuppressive or glucocorticosteroids, except subjects taking occasional doses or doses less than 10mg prednisolon/day or equivalent. Subjects inhaling glucocorticosteroids for asthma should not be excluded.
  • Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the investigation products.
  • Subjects with physical and/or mental conditions that are not expected to comply with the investigation due to poor medical condition
  • Participation in other clinical investigation(s) within 1 month prior to start of the investigation.
  • Previously randomised to this investigation.
  • Life expectance of the subject less than 3 months
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

Treatment and study plan

Mepilex Ag

Device

Mepilex is designed for a wide range of exuding wounds such as leg and foot ulcers, pressure ulcers and traumatic wounds, e.g. skin tears and secondary healing wounds.

Mepilex without Ag

Device

Mepilex is designed for a wide range of exuding wounds such as leg and foot ulcers, pressure ulcers and traumatic wounds, e.g. skin tears and secondary healing wounds.

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy Will be Defined as Absolute Wound Size Reduction.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Efficacy will be defined as absolute wound size reduction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Inflammatory Signs

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Change in inflammatory signs

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Molnlycke Health Care AB

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Double-blind, Comparative, Superiority, Multi-centre Investigation Evaluating the Efficacy of an Absorbent Foam Dressing Containing Silver (Mepilex Ag) Versus the Same Dressing Without Silver Used on Subjects With Venous Leg Ulcers or Mixed Ulcers

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Dec 21, 2009
Registry last updated
Sep 12, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.