Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02470806

Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System vs. Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT)

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of two types of NPWT systems; the traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) system and the single-use negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) system.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Mayer Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The two types of NPWT systems include the tNPWT system that has successfully completed a coding verification request with CMS and has the following capabilities (e.g., range of negative pressure, connective tubing, canister, foam or gauze filler, and approved for home use), and a portable, canister-less, battery operated, disposable PICO system to see if there are any observed differences with regard to the clinical efficacy of the two devices.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex
  • Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments
  • Have a Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 36.0 cm2
  • Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months)
  • Have a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) present on any part of the plantar or dorsum surface of the foot, with a surface area ≥ 0.5 cm2 and ≤ 10.0 cm2
  • Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone
  • Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 52 weeks (12 months)
  • Acceptable state of health and nutrition

Exclusion criteria

  • Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study Ulcers which are deemed as highly exuding, per the Investigator's discretion.
  • Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis at the target wound location that is not currently receiving treatment [Documented history of resolved osteomyelitis is allowed].
  • Subjects with a VLU: Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
  • Clinical evidence of target ulcer infection
  • Current systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs.
  • Current therapy with chronic (> 10 days) oral corticosteroids.
  • Previous treatment with NPWT device or hyperbaric oxygen within 7 days of screening.
  • Malignancy in the target ulcer, or history of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers)

Treatment and study plan

PICO System

Device

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) at 80mmHg (nominal) +/- 20 mmHg to the wound surface

tNPWT System

Device

NPWT from -25 mmHg and up to -200 mmHg; intensity settings of either low, medium and high; delivery modes of continuous or intermittent. The pressure, intensity and delivery settings will be left to the Investigator's discretion at each study treatment visit.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

    Ulcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the post-debridement ulcer area (cm^2 and total percentage [%]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

  2. Percentage Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

    Ulcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the postdebridement ulcer area (cm^2 and total percentage [%]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

    Ulcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

  2. Change in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

    Ulcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

  3. Percentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

    Ulcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Study of a Single-Use, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO) Versus a Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT) in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Ulcers

Acronym: NPWT

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jun 12, 2015
Registry last updated
Apr 6, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.