Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, South Holland, 2333ZA, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05290701
This study evaluates the impact of the various outcomes of pES (definitive diagnosis, probable diagnosis and IF) on clinical decision making and on parental psychological wellbeing, compared between different analysis strategies to investigate the clinical utility, defined as the balance between potential harms and benefits.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Leiden, South Holland, 2333ZA, Netherlands
Foetal anomalies as detected on prenatal ultrasound are present in 2-3% of pregnancies. The diagnosis of a genetic syndrome as the underlying cause often has significant consequences for the prognosis and therefore also a significant impact on parental reproductive decision making. In addition to chromosomal testing, prenatal exome sequencing (pES) is increasingly being offered. Although prenatal diagnostic rates are promising, no studies report on the actual implementation of pES in routine care and thus several important knowledge gaps remain regarding clinical utility (the balance between potential harms and benefits) and the preferred analysis strategy (broad versus targeted analysis). A broad analysis has a possible higher diagnostic yield, but it is unknown whether the increased chance of finding an uncertain diagnosis and Incidental Findings outweighs this benefit when it comes to clinical decision making and parental psychological wellbeing. The central aim of this study is to address the knowledge gaps raised above, and increase clinical utility by using the obtained data to improve analysis strategies and to potentially identify new genes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
There are no exclusion criteria.
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 2 years
We will use validated scales such as the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6, the Decisional Conflict Scale, the Decisional Regret Scale, the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, the Impact of Event Scale and the Pre- and Postnatal Bonding Scale.
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical impact will be defined as medical or surgical in utero intervention, pregnancy termination, location and mode of delivery, decisions on comfort care and neonatal policy influenced by the results of pES.
Time frame: 2 years
pES data of all included pregnancies will be retrieved and re-analyzed to minimize differences in variant interpretation and to determine the impact of different analysis strategies on the percentages of various outcomes of pES (definitive diagnoses, probable diagnoses and incidental findings). Different analysis strategies will be employed: analysis of an HPO-based gene panel, analysis of an established gene panel of genes causing multiple congenital anomalies and/or intellectual disability, and analysis of all genes.
Time frame: 2 years
Leiden University Medical Center
Other
Acronym: EPES
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07167017
Communication Disorders, Congenital Abnormalities
View Trial DetailsNCT07064356
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital Anomalies
View Trial DetailsNCT06820892
Antenatal Consultation, Congenital Abnormalities
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04598503
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital Anomalies
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial Details