liposomal irinotecan
Drug50 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
NCT Number: NCT07076212
This is a single-center, open-label, randomized Phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy of NALIRIFOX (Arm 1) vs mGAP (Arm 2) in previously untreated patients with locally advanced (unresectable) and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies in the United States and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In the metastatic setting, treatment consists of systemic chemotherapy in hopes of palliating symptoms and prolonging survival. However, prognosis remains very poor, and patients will invariably succumb to disease-related complications. Therefore, there is a critical need to identify new first-line systemic therapeutic options in hopes of improving clinical outcomes in PDAC.
FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-flurouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) became a standard of care systemic therapy option in metastatic PDAC, largely based on the findings from the Phase III ACCORD 11 study, where the objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher with FOLFIRINOX vs single-agent gemcitabine (32% vs 9%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.4 months vs 3.3 months) and overall survival (OS) (11.1 months vs 6.8 months) were higher as well. However, a recent Phase I/II study demonstrated tolerability of the chemotherapy combination liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (NALIRIFOX) in locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. This has been followed by a randomized Phase III study evaluating first-line NALIRIFOX vs gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, which has demonstrated greater ORR with NALIRIFOX than gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (41.8% vs 36.2%). Both median PFS (7.4 months vs 5.6 months) and OS (11.1 months vs 9.2 months) were significantly higher with NALIRIFOX than with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as well. In light of these findings, NALIRIFOX use in treatment-naïve patients is increasing.
As suggested above, gemcitabine combinations have elicited treatment responses in advanced PDAC as well. Efficacy of first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was demonstrated in the MPACT trial, where a higher ORR and median OS was noted in the combination arm vs single-agent gemcitabine (23% vs 7% and 8.7 months vs 6.7 months, respectively). This led to its indication for use in metastatic and locally advanced PDAC. Additionally, gemcitabine plus cisplatin was noted to have an ORR of 74% in germline BRCA1/2 and PALB2 mutated advanced PDAC. A recent small Phase II study demonstrated the use of the triplet regimen, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin administered on Day 1 and Day 8 of a 21-day cycle as having clinical activity in metastatic PDAC where ORR was 71% with median PFS and median OS of 10.1 months and 16.4 months, respectively. However, it remains unknown whether this triplet regimen is more efficacious than NALIRIFOX.
Therefore, investigators propose evaluating whether gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin (mGAP) will lead to greater ORR than NALIRIFOX in previously untreated patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. Of note, despite the high ORR observed with this regimen, 2 of 3 deaths in the study were attributed by the authors to the chemotherapy combination. Due to this toxicity, rather than administering the triplet regimen on Day 1 and Day 8 of a 21-day cycle as done in the Phase Ib/II study, investigators will proceed with Day 1 and Day 15 administration of a 28-day cycle. Investigators hypothesize that gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin will have a greater ORR than NALIRIFOX and lead to improved secondary outcome measurements of BOR, DOR, DCR, PFS, OS, and toxicity profile. Investigators will determine its clinical utility relative to NALIRIFOX in the first-line setting based on standard radiology used to measure treatment response. Findings from this study may have implications for changing the standard of care systemic therapeutic approach in patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced and metastatic PDAC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
60 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
5-fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours) will begin administration on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
400 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
1000 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle
125 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle
25 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Overall response rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by RECIST v1.1 as assessed by imaging completed every 8 weeks.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Best overall response (BOR) defined as a patient's best response across all response evaluations by RECIST v1.1 (CR, PR, stable disease [SD], or progressive disease [PD]) as assessed by imaging completed every 8 weeks.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Duration of response (DOR) defined as the time interval between first evaluation of CR or PR and the first occurrence of progression or death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of CR, PR or SD.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time from randomization to progression or death due to any cause.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Toxicity profile of each chemotherapy regimen as determined by AEs, SAEs and TEAEs and based on CTCAE v5.0
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Medical University of South Carolina
Other
Phase II Study Evaluating NALIRIFOX Versus Modified Gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06998940
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05034627
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06381154
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03269526
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
View Trial Details