Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT06998940
This phase III trial compares the effect of adding panitumumab to standard chemotherapy (with nanoliposomal Irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] or irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-FU or nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) versus standard chemotherapy alone in treating patients with KRAS wild type (WT) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that cannot be removed by sugery (unresectable) or that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Chemotherapy drugs, such as nanoliposomal irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-FU, irinotecan, nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Adding panitumumab to standard chemotherapy may be effective in treating patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic KRAS WT pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare overall survival (OS) between participants with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS wild type (WT) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) randomized to panitumumab plus second-line cytotoxic chemotherapy (5FU- or gemcitabine-based) versus chemotherapy alone.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment arms. II. To compare the overall response rate (ORR) (ORR, including confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1 criteria) between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease.
III. To compare disease control rate (DCR) (DCR, defined as ORR + stable disease rate [SD]) between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease.
IV. To evaluate the frequency and severity of toxicity within each treatment arm.
V. To compare duration of response (DoR) between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease.
ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare OS and PFS between treatment arms in the subgroup of participants with MAPK negative cancers, that is, cancers without any known mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway molecular alterations (type 1 or 2 BRAF mutations; BRAF, NRG1, ROS1, FGFR1-3 and RAF1 fusions; EGFR, KRAS, and FGFR1-3 amplification).
II. To compare ORR in participants with MAPK negative cancers between treatment arms in participants with measurable disease.
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITIERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS (CTCAE) OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare health-related quality of life (QOL) by treatment arm at 8 weeks after randomization, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) total score.
II. To compare the impact of treatment toxicity by treatment arm at 8 weeks after randomization, measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Item GP5.
III. To compare changes from baseline in QOL and impact of treatment toxicity between treatment arms using FACT-G total score and FACIT Item GP5 to 24 weeks after randomization.
IV. To assess patient-reported symptoms by treatment arm using selected patient reported outcome (PRO)-CTCAE items including gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and constitutional symptoms of pain and fatigue.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive panitumumab intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15. Patients also receive either nanoliposomal irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 15, leucovorin IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 15, and 5-FU IV over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or irinotecan IV over 90 minutes, leucovorin IV over 90-120 minutes on days 1 and 15, 5-FU IV bolus over 5-15 minutes on days 1 and 15 and 5FU IV continuous over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or nab-paclitaxel IV over 30 minutes, and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scan and blood sample collection throughout the study.
ARM B: Patients receive either nanoliposomal irinotecan IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 15, leucovorin IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 15, and 5-FU IV over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or irinotecan IV over 90 minutes, leucovorin IV over 90-120 minutes on days 1 and 15, 5-FU IV bolus over 5-15 minutes on days 1 and 15 and 5FU IV continuous over 46 hours on days 1-3 and 15-17 or nab-paclitaxel IV over 30 minutes, and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo CT scan and blood sample collection throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 3 years post randomization.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo CT scan
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, tomography
Given IV
Other names: 5 Fluorouracil, 5 Fluorouracilum, 5 FU, 5-Fluoro-2,4(1H, 3H)-pyrimidinedione, 5-Fluorouracil, 5-Fluracil, 5-Fu, 5FU, AccuSite, Carac, Fluoro Uracil, Fluouracil, Flurablastin, Fluracedyl, Fluracil, Fluril, Fluroblastin, Ribofluor, Ro 2-9757, Ro-2-9757
Given IV
Other names: dFdC, dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine
Given IV
Given IV
Other names: inotecan Hydrochloride as Sucrosulfate Salt Form Liposomal Formulation, Irinotecan Liposome, Irinotecan Sucrosofate Liposome, Irinotecan Sucrosofate-containing Pegylated Liposomal Formulation, MM 398, MM-398, MM398, nal-IRI, Nanoliposomal Irinotecan, Nanoliposomal Irinotecan as Sucrosofate, Nanoparticle Liposome Formulation of Irinotecan, Onivyde, PEP 02, PEP-02, PEP02
Given IV
Other names: Folinic acid
Given IV
Other names: ABI 007, ABI-007, ABI007, Abraxane, Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Albumin-Stabilized Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel, Nanoparticle Paclitaxel, Naveruclif, Paclitaxel Albumin, paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation, Paclitaxel Nanoparticle Albumin-bound, Paclitaxel Protein-Bound, Protein-bound Paclitaxel
Given IV
Other names: ABX-EGF, ABX-EGF Monoclonal Antibody, ABX-EGF, Clone E7.6.3, E7.6.3, Human IgG2K Monoclonal Antibody, MoAb ABX-EGF, MoAb E7.6.3, Monoclonal Antibody ABX-EGF, Monoclonal Antibody E7.6.3, Vectibix
Ancillary studies
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
Analysis of OS will be conducted in all eligible participants according to the intent-to-treat principle using a 1-sided stratified log rank test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Will be compared across treatment arms via Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Will be compared across treatment arms via Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
The distributions of DoR will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration (per RECIST 1.1), or death due to any cause, up to 3 years
The distributions of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last study treatment
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years
The distributions of OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration (per RECIST 1.1), or death due to any cause, up to 3 years
The distributions of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared using the stratified log rank test.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Will be compared across treatment arms via Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: At 8 weeks after randomization
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) total score. Analysis will be conducted using multiple linear regression analysis, adjusting for the clinical study-specified stratification factors (which are also anticipated to influence QOL endpoints), and the baseline score as covariates.
Time frame: At 8 weeks after randomization
Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Item GP5 (FACIT Item GP5). Analysis will be conducted using multiple linear regression analysis, adjusting for the clinical study-specified stratification factors, and the baseline score as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 weeks after randomization
Will be assessed using FACT-G total score. Linear regression models will be used for longitudinal modeling, with robust errors estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. Covariates for longitudinal modeling will include intervention assignment, the assessment timepoint, the baseline score, and the stratification factors. The potential for differential dropout by arm will be mitigated by reminder notifications to site investigators to encourage proper assessment and submission of forms at every required time point for all participants. Cohort plots will be prepared to examine the extent to which missing data are informative (i.e., scores are higher (worse) for participants just before their data are missing for the subsequent assessment). If there is evidence of non-random dropout, pattern-mixture models will be utilized as a sensitivity analysis.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 weeks post randomization
Will be assessed using FACIT Item GP5. Linear regression models will be used for longitudinal modeling, with robust errors estimated via generalized estimating equations to adjust for correlation between repeated outcome measures. Covariates for longitudinal modeling will include intervention assignment, the assessment timepoint, the baseline score, and the stratification factors. The potential for differential dropout by arm will be mitigated by reminder notifications to site investigators to encourage proper assessment and submission of forms at every required time point for all participants. Cohort plots will be prepared to examine the extent to which missing data are informative (i.e., scores are higher (worse) for participants just before their data are missing for the subsequent assessment). If there is evidence of non-random dropout, pattern-mixture models will be utilized as a sensitivity analysis.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after last study treatment
Patient-reported symptoms will be assessed by treatment arm using selected patient reported outcomes (PRO)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) items including gastrointestinal, dermatologic as well as constitutional symptoms of pain and fatigue. For each of the PRO-CTCAE adverse events examined, the scores for each attribute (frequency, severity and/or interference) will be presented descriptively using summary statistics at each assessment time. Additionally, the worst severity and/or interference over the entire course will be summarized.
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
Randomized Phase III Study of Second-Line Chemotherapy With or Without Panitumumab for KRAS Wild Type, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06381154
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05034627
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07619313
Adenocarcinoma, Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01585805
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details