University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706-1539, United States
NCT Number: NCT04275973
This study is intended to test the comparative biomechanical benefits of different lower-limb prostheses and orthoses using data collected over extended periods of everyday life using wearable sensors. Investigators seek to improve physical health, functional activity level, independence, workforce participation, and mental health in participants with lower limb amputation and other lower-limb impairments. Investigators seek to study the similarities and differences in participants' movement using prostheses and orthoses with different technological features or designs. Study team also seek to develop technologies that enhance the methods for using wearable sensor technology to perform this type of study.
Participants with lower-limb amputation, participants who use lower limb orthoses, and participants with drop-foot (including a specific group with Multiple Sclerosis).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706-1539, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Target Populations:
Multiple Sclerosis group:
Exclusion criteria
Target Populations:
Standard commercially available prostheses for participants with lower-limb amputation.
Specific prostheses will be determined at the time of the study, but they will include prostheses that are fully passive such as energy storage-and-return (ESR, Agilix) feet and low-profile foot (LP, Pacifica LP), ESR feet with mobilized ankles such as passive hydraulic ankles (PHA, Kinterra), and ESR feet with microprocessor-controlled ankles (MPA, Kinnex).
Other names: Low-profile foot, Energy-storing foot, Hydraulic ankle, Microprocessor ankle
Standard commercially-available orthoses or standard-of-care custom orthoses as well as standard commercially-available electrical stimulation neuro-orthoses.
Sprystep for the caAFO, Bioness L300 Go for the FES
Other names: carbon fiber ankle foot orthosis (caAFO), functional electrical stimulation (FES)
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Minimum Foot Clearance with different prostheses, participants crossover to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions
Minimum Foot Clearance with different orthoses, participants crossover to each of 3 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 20 days on study.
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Behavioral gait function will be measured by daily stride count (strides per sensor hour, Prosthetics only), participants crossed over to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study.
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Behavioral gait function will be measured by average stride speed, participants crossover to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study.
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) is a 12 item questionnaire. It is a self-report instrument for measuring mobility of adults with lower limb amputation.
PLUS-M instruments measure prosthetic users' mobility (i.e., the ability to move intentionally and independently from one place to another). PLUS-M questions assess respondents' perceived ability to carry out actions that require use of both lower limbs, ranging from household ambulation to outdoor recreational activities. The described activities relate to two primary forms of movement, locomotion (i.e., movement in a continuous, repeatable pattern) and/or postural transitions (i.e., movement from one position to another or one type of activity to another).
PLUS-M instruments provide a T-score that averages 50 with a standard deviation of 10. A higher PLUS-M T-score corresponds to greater mobility.
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Change in movement quality will be determined by stride width, participants crossover to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study. Stride width is the absolute value of the lateral distance from a line that is fit to the foot placements of 3 strides previous and 3 strides after the current stride, to the foot placement location of the current stride.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions
Change in movement quality will be determined by stride width, participants crossover to different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 20 days on study. Stride width is the absolute value of the lateral distance from a line that is fit to the foot placements of 3 strides previous and 3 strides after the current stride, to the foot placement location of the current stride.
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Change in gait performance as determined by speed of the participant, participants crossover to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study.
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Gait performance as determined by stride frequency at identical speed (included strides with walking speeds between 0.75-1.25 meters per second). Participants crossover to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Ground reaction force is force applied by the body to the ground. Peak forces and shape of the force vs. time trajectory are commonly used to assess gait quality. Forces closer to "normal" are usually considered better, but this goal does not apply in participants with amputation.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions, weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Socket torque (also termed "socket moment") is the amount of twisting or bending torque applied to the prosthetic socket. Peak socket torque and cumulative socket torque are measures commonly used to assess gait quality in persons with lower limb amputation.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days for Orthotic interventions
The Functional Gait Assessment Score will be measured for the sub-population of participants with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating increased impairment in gait. Participants crossover to each of three conditions at different study visits.
Time frame: Baseline, 10 days, and 20 days study visits to test conditions for Orthotic interventions
The sub-population of participants with MS will undergo a 6 minute walking test for distance. Each participant will crossover to three conditions over three study visits: No intervention, the carbon fiber ankle foot orthosis (cfAFO), and a functional electrical stimulation (FES) device). Reported here are the difference from No intervention for the cfAFO and FES orthoses, a positive number shows an increase in distance walked due to the intervention.
Time frame: Weekly time points for Prosthetic interventions (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks), data collected anytime up to 12 weeks on study
Walking speeds from 0.75 to 1.25 meters per second were analyzed, participants crossover to each of 4 different conditions at different study visits, data collected up to 12 weeks on study.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07715578
Balance Impairment, Lower Limb Amputation
Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07565662
Lower Limb Amputation, Nervous System Diseases
Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT06883942
Fall Risk, Lower Limb Amputation
Florence, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05880251
Chronic Pain, Lower Limb Amputation
Albany, New York, United States
View Trial Details