Department of Periodontics and implantology , Institute of Dental sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
NCT Number: NCT07308405
The present study was a double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial with a parallel design, comparing the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and chorion membrane (CM) for the treatment of isolated gingival recession defects. A total of 50 patients were randomly divided into; Experimental site A: Twenty five sites were treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane; Experimental site B: Twenty five sites were treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and chorion membrane (CM)The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, protocol was developed and ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, India [IDS/ETHCC/14/08]. As per protocol, a study was conducted in five phases: (1) initial screening; (2) initial therapy and clinical measurements; (3) surgical therapy; (4) maintenance phase; and (5) post-operative evaluation after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), a second-generation platelet concentrate, accelerates soft and hard tissue regeneration. Chorion membrane, of fetal origin, has wound-modulating properties. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of PRF and chorion membrane in treating isolated Miller's Class I or II gingival recession defects. Fifty recession defects in 50 patients were randomly treated with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) and PRF membrane (site A, n = 25) or CAF with chorion membrane (site B, n = 25). Clinical parameters recorded at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months included recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinised gingiva (WKG), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and gingival biotype. Statistical analysis compared outcomes across follow-up intervals. At six months, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in RD, RW, CAL, WKG, PI, and GI compared with baseline. Mean percentage root coverage was 86.76 ± 13.76 in the PRF group and 82.89 ± 15.65 in the chorion group, with no statistically significant difference between them. Sites with an initial thin biotype showed conversion to a thick biotype in both groups. Both PRF and chorion membrane demonstrated predictable effectiveness for managing isolated recession defects, with comparable outcomes. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Description: After achieving adequate anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine (1:80,000 adrenaline), an intrasulcular incision was made on the buccal aspect of the involved teeth. Two horizontal incisions were placed from the mesial and distal angles to the papillae at the CEJ, without involving adjacent gingival margins. From their ends, two bevelled, slightly divergent oblique incisions were extended beyond the mucogingival junction, creating a trapezoidal flap. A full-thickness flap was raised up to the MGJ, followed by split-thickness dissection apically, with periosteal release to allow passive coronal mobilization. Adequate mobilization was defined as the flap margin reaching passively coronal to the CEJ. The coronal papilla soft tissue was de-epithelialized to prepare connective tissue beds for suturing of the coronally advanced flap. At the recipient site, the prepared PRF membrane was placed over the denuded root surfaces.
Time frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
Measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of the gingival margin
Time frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
Measured between mesial and distal papillae across the buccal surface at the CEJ level
Time frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits:
Measured from the CEJ to the bottom of the gingival sulcus;
Time frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
Measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ)
Time frame: Baseline, prior to surgery and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months follow-up visits
Evaluated based on the transparency of the probe through the gingival margin while probing the sulcus at the midfacial aspect of teeth
Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
Other
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap With Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane and Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Human Gingival Recession
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07736833
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Recession
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05470660
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Recession
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07291583
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Recession
Ankara, None Selected, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07616960
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Recession
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details