University of Alberta Hospital; Royal Alexandra Hospital, Foothills Medical Centre (Calgary)
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
NCT Number: NCT00175240
People with coronary artery disease can reduce their chance of having a heart attack by making healthy lifestyle choices (diet, exercise, quitting smoking,etc.). There are also many medications that have been proven to reduce the risk of heart attacks and may even help people live longer. This study will look at different ways of improving the use of these beneficial medications to enhance the quality of care for people with this condition.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
BACKGROUND: Despite the abundant evidence base for secondary prevention, practice audits consistently demonstrate substantial "care gaps" between this evidence and clinical reality such that many patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) are not offered all possible therapies for the prevention of myocardial infarction or death. For example, even after an acute myocardial infarction, almost one fifth of patients continue to smoke; over half with hypertension or hyperlipidemia have poorly controlled pressure or lipid levels; and proven therapies such as statins, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers and antiplatelet agents are under-prescribed.
Multiple barriers are often responsible for the lack of implementation of proven efficacious therapies and traditional means of educating practitioners (journal articles, CME, conferences, etc) are usually ineffective in altering practice. Clearly novel interventions to improve the quality of prescribing are needed. Local opinion leaders are trusted by their peers to evaluate medical innovations and thus influence practice patterns within their community. Few controlled studies, however, have evaluated their effect on changing prescribing practices for common conditions such as CAD.
HYPOTHESIS: This trial will test 2 quality improvement interventions. The principle hypothesis is: does a one-page evidence summary endorsed by local opinion leaders increase the provision of secondary prevention therapies in patients with CAD compared to usual care? The secondary hypotheses are: does the same intervention but without local opinion leader endorsement improve the provision of secondary prevention strategies in patients with CAD compared to usual care? Does local opinion leader endorsement increase the effectiveness of the quality improvement intervention?
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
University of Alberta
Other
Enhancing the Use of Secondary Prevention Strategies in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (The ESP-CAD Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00426868
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT00175279
Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05599061
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05027984
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Pátrai, AX, Greece
View Trial Details