Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria at OCT in Patients With ACS

The optimal strategy in patients with intermediate stenosis (40-70% diameter stenosis) at coronary angiography is currently under debate. Pure angiographic stenosis evaluation is often inadequate and alternative assessments of coronary plaques entered the clinical practice, such as functional assessment (FFR/iFR/RFR) and intravascular imaging (OCT and intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]). Based on preliminary data, current American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) revascularization guidelines recommend the use of flow fractional reserve (FFR, class IIa of evidence) to assess angiographic intermediate coronary lesions in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and guide intervention. However, controversial data has recently emerged on the role of functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions in both acute and chronic settings. On the other hand, in recent studies, the presence of coronary plaques with vulnerability criteria at OCT identified patients at high risk of cardiac mortality and target vessel MI. This study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of an OCT-based strategy to guide revascularization in non-culprit intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), on the basis of the presence of morphological markers of plaque vulnerability. Patients with intermediate coronary lesions in non-culprit intervention-naïve major coronary segments (diameter ≥2.5 mm) and fulfilling all inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible. Enrolled patients will be randomized 1:1 to either OCT or FFR/RFR/iFR based treatment. In the OCT-guided arm, non-culprit intermediate lesions will be treated with PCI with implantation of a second-generation drug eluting stent (DES) when a FCT <75 µm plus at least 2 of 3 other OCT criteria of plaque vulnerability (i.e., MLA <3.5 mm2, lipid arc with circumferential extension >180°, and the presence of clusters of macrophages) and/or an MLA <2 mm2 are detected by OCT. In the absence of the above-mentioned 4 vulnerability criteria, interventional procedures will be performed at discretion of the operator if a luminal thrombus is detected by OCT. In the physiology-guided arm, non-culprit intermediate lesions will be treated with PCI with implantation of a second-generation DES when an iFR or RFR ≤0.89 or an FFR ≤0.80 are measured, otherwise interventional procedures will be deferred. The primary endpoint, a composite of cardiac death and target vessel spontaneous myocardial infarction, will be assessed after 3 and 5 years.

Inclusion criteria

• Age of at least 18 years.
• Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.
• Single or multiple intermediate lesions in intervention-naïve major coronary segments (diameter ≥2.5 mm) determining a 40-70% diameter stenosis by visual assessment with no other significant stenosis (>70%) in the same vessel.
• Patient informed of the nature of the study, agreeing to it, and providing written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee of the respective clinical study site.
• Life expectancy >3 years.

Exclusion criteria

• Female with childbearing potential or lactating.
• Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl).
• Advanced heart failure (NYHA III-IV)
• Stroke within the previous 6 months or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage at any time.
• Severe valvular disease or valvular disease likely to require surgery or percutaneous valve replacement during the trial.
• Coronary anatomy preventing complete imaging of the segment of interest (including at least 5 mm at both stenosis edges).
• Lesions located in the left main coronary artery
• Diffusely diseased coronary artery segment or presence of ≥1 significant untreated non-culprit lesions (preventing correct adverse event attribution) in the coronary arteries.
• Prior myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] or PCI revascularization in the target coronary vessel.
• Coronary anatomy unsuitable for PCI.
• Comorbidities that might interfere with completion of the study procedures.
• Planned major surgery necessitating interruption of dual antiplatelet.
• Participating in another investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or would interfere with the endpoints of this study.