Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01907217

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Depression

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most powerful antidepressant treatment available and is often life-saving. There are concerns, however, that standard bitemporal ECT (the most commonly used form of ECT worldwide) causes persisting retrograde amnesia. However, clinical trials have indicated that high-dose unilateral ECT may be as effective as bitemporal ECT but have much less cognitive side-effects.

The trial aims to test the primary experimental hypothesis: High-dose (6 x ST) right unilateral ECT is as effective as (i.e. not inferior to) standard (1.5 x ST) bitemporal ECT for severe depression in terms of Hamilton Depression Rating Score (HDRS) at the end of the treatment course.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Depression Behavior Behavioral Symptoms

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

St Patrick's University Hospital

Dublin, 8, Ireland

About this study

The study is a two-group parallel design randomised controlled non-inferiority trial and has been registered (ISRCTN23577151). Consented patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) will be randomly allocated to a course of bitemporal (BT) ECT (1.5 x ST) or high-dose right unilateral (RUL) ECT (6.0 x ST). To facilitate generalizability of results, the trial takes place under "real world" conditions and so both groups continue usual care and medications during the treatment phase and thereafter. Patients are followed-up for 12 months after completing their allocated course of ECT. Completion of the primary outcome depression-rating measure (i.e. HDRS) and the secondary outcome of most interest (autobiographical memory, using the AMI-SF) will be prioritised in the data collection.

Patients, their treating clinicians and raters are blind to treatment; clinicians administering ECT are not involved in post randomisation assessments or formal data analysis. Success of blinding for patients and raters will be assessed after the second and final treatments. The trial statistician is also blinded to allocation status.

Sample size: In a large series (n = 253) of depressed patients, Petrides et al. (2001) found a mean (SD) reduction in 24-item HDRS of 25.6 (9.4) after treatment with bitemporalT ECT (1.5 x ST). We therefore estimate that 69 patients will be required per treatment group to have 80% power to demonstrate, using a one-sided equivalence t-test at 5% level, that mean reduction in 24-item HDRS achieved using high-dose RUL ECT is no more than 4 points (i.e. equivalent to 3 points on 17-item HDRS) less than that achieved using standard BT ECT, assuming a common within-group SD of change scores of 9.4 and equal expected group mean change scores.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥18 years diagnosed with major depressive episode (DSM-IV) and referred for ECT

Exclusion criteria

  • Any condition rendering patients medically unfit for general anaesthesia or ECT; treatment with ECT in previous six months; dementia or other Axis 1 diagnosis; alcohol/other substance abuse in previous six months; inability/refusal to consent.

Treatment and study plan

ECT Mecta 5000M

Device

ECT is administered twice weekly with hand-held electrodes using the Mecta 5000M device following a standard stimulus dosing protocol. Seizure duration is measured by EEG monitoring. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) as muscle relaxant. Seizure threshold (ST) is established by a method of limits at the first session and subsequent treatments will be given at 1.5 x ST for BT ECT and 6.0 x ST for RUL ECT. To reflect routine clinical practice, number of ECT treatments is determined by referring physicians who will be blind to randomisation. The treatment period varies between patients to allow up to 12 administrations of ECT, i.e. up to 6 weeks.

Other names: electroconvulsive therapy Mecta 500M device

Methohexitone

Drug

Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia along with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)for muscle relaxation. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.

Other names: methohexital, Brevimytal (Hikma, Germany)

Suxamethonium

Drug

Suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)is used for muscle relaxation along with Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) for anaesthesia. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.

Other names: Succinylcholine, Anectine (GlaxoSmithKline, UK)

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

    Time frame: HDRS scores were obtained at baseline, end of allocated ECT treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up timepoints.

    The HDRS was originally designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms in patients with a primary depressive illness and is now the most commonly used measure of depression severity. It was first published in a 17-item format with the optional addition of 4 items making up the 21-item version. In addition to the original 21 items, the 24-item HDRS includes items on helplessness, hopelessness and worthlessness; its score range is 0-77, with higher scores reflecting greater burden of depressive symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

    Time frame: end of allocated ECT course

    The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

  2. Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

    The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

  3. Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)

    Time frame: 6 months follow-up

    The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland

Other

Collaborators

  • Health Research Board, Ireland

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Standard Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus High-dose Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy for Severe Depression

Acronym: EFFECT-Dep

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jul 24, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 14, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.