Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01515501

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for the Diagnosis of a-Ganglionosis, a Controlled Prospective Trial (EDGE Trial)

Patients undergoing routine rectal suction biopsy will undergo as part of the study an additional Endoscopic mucosal resection. The biopsy results will also be correlated with patient's clinical data including clinical history, Bristol stool scale, anorectal manometry results, and SITZ marker studies. Cost and recovery time will be compared.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Background: Adult and pediatric patients presenting with chronic constipation and/or motility disorders may be referred for rectal biopsy to rule out aganglionosis or Hirschsprung's disease. The traditional diagnostic test, rectal suction biopsy, is a blind technique and is insensitive in confirming the diagnosis. Frequently, patients require subsequent referral for a surgical full thickness biopsy.

Hypothesis: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) will improve the diagnostic yield for aganglionosis and decrease the need for subsequent surgical full thickness biopsy.

Methods: This is a prospective, single center, controlled investigation of EMR for the diagnosis of colonic aganglionosis / Hirschsprung's disease. Patients who are offered rectal suction biopsy will be offered enrollment. Enrolled patients will have one additional procedure (EMR) at the time of their rectal suction biopsy. Specimens will be analyzed pathologically for size, submucosal tissue adequacy, the presence of ganglionic tissue, and positivity by acetylcholinesterase staining. The adequacy of the tissue specimen, the proportion of diagnostic specimens, and the proportion of patients that would have required subsequent referral for full thickness biopsy, will be compared. Variable such as cost and recovery time will be compared. Biopsy results will be compared with patient's pre-endoscopy clinical data including their history of constipation, results of SITZ marker studies, Bristol stool scale, and anorectal manometry.

Results: The primary outcome variable will be the proportion of patients with a diagnostic specimen in each group. Secondary outcome variables will include the size of the specimen, the presence of ganglionic tissue, the presence of submucosal tissue, and the positivity of the acetylcholinesterase stain. The biopsy results will also be correlated with patient's clinical data including clinical history, Bristol stool scale, anorectal manometry results, and SITZ marker studies. Cost and recovery time will be compared.

Discussion: The proposed investigation may demonstrate that a simple endoscopic test, which uses direct visualization, can improve the diagnostic yield of rectal biopsies for Hirschsprung's disease, and spare patients an additional surgical full thickness rectal biopsy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 10 years of age or older
  • offered Rectal Suction biopsy

Exclusion criteria

  • any contraindication to general anesthesia or conscious sedation
  • contraindication to endoscopy
  • untreated or unmanageable coagulopathy
  • thrombocytopenia (<50)
  • inability to provide informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)

Procedure

EMR uses an endoscope to take a tissue sample from the rectum. It is the same type of instrument used in a routine colonoscopy. It is hoped that this procedure will help diagnose Hirschsprung's Disease more often than by recal suction biopsy alone, which can often be unclear and result in more invasive surgery for diagnosis.

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of EMR Biopsies that are diagnostic specimens

    Time frame: One Year

    The adequacy of the tissue specimen, the proportion of diagnostic specimens, and the proportion of patients that would have required subsequent referral for full thickness biopsy, will be compared. Variable such as cost and recovery time will be compared. Biopsy results will be compared with patient's pre-endoscopy clinical data including their history of constipation, results of SITZ marker studies, Bristol stool scale, and anorectal manometry.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Acronym: EDGE

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jan 24, 2012
Registry last updated
Aug 16, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.