Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04895904

Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) is a common critical disease in gastroenterology. Due to the development of modern medical technology, the incidence rate of ANVUGIB has been decreasing in recent years, but its mortality within 30 days is still 11%. Endoscopic hemostasis and drug therapy are the first choice for the treatment of ANVUGIB. After endoscopic hemostasis, it is very important to treat peptic ulcer bleeding with strong acid suppression therapy to maintain gastric pH above 6.0. This study is to study the effect of endoscopic and drug treatment of ANVUGIB.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) is a common critical disease in gastroenterology. It refers to the bleeding caused by the non varicose diseases above the ligament of flexor, including the bleeding of pancreaticobiliary tract and the bleeding caused by the diseases near the anastomotic stoma after gastrojejunostomy. Due to the development of modern medical technology, the incidence rate of ANVUGIB has been decreasing in recent years. A US study shows that the incidence rate of ANVUGIB dropped from 78/10 to 61/10 10000 [1] from 2001 to 2009. However, the mortality within 30 days of ANVUGIB is still as high as 11% [2]. Peptic ulcer bleeding is the most common cause of bleeding in ANVUGIB. The annual incidence rate is 19.4-57/10 million, and the rate of rebleeding within 7 days is 13.9%, and the mortality rate is 30 in 30 days. A study in China shows that compared with the 1990s, the detection rate of high-risk ulcer has increased, but the overall mortality has not decreased significantly [4]. Endoscopic hemostasis is the first choice for the treatment of peptic ulcer. The latest guidelines of our country recommend that patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding with stable hemodynamics should try their best to have emergency gastroscopy within 24 hours after bleeding, and emergency endoscopic hemostasis is feasible for bleeding lesions [5]. After endoscopic hemostasis, it is very important to give strong acid suppression therapy to maintain gastric pH above 6.0 in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding [6-9]. This study is to analyze the effect of endoscopic and drug treatment of ANVUGIB.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • From January 2014 to February 2021, patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding underwent emergency endoscopic hemostasis in our hospital.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. The age is less than or equal to 18 years old and greater than or equal to 85 years old; 2. Forrest grade IIC and III; 3. Complicated with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases or severe liver and kidney diseases (such as heart failure, liver failure, renal failure, etc.); 4. The records of the cases were incomplete.

Treatment and study plan

No intervention

Other

Our study is an observational study and the main purpose of our study is to observe the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis and drug therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Rebleeding

    Time frame: Within 30 days after endoscopic hemostasis

    Clinically, the following symptoms or laboratory examination results suggest rebleeding within 30 days after successful endoscopic hemostasis:(1) The frequency of hematemesis or melena increased, the vomit was bright red or dark red bloody stool, or accompanied by active bowel sounds;

    (2) After rapid infusion and blood transfusion, the symptoms of peripheral circulation failure did not improve significantly, or although temporarily improved and then deteriorated, the central venous pressure still fluctuated, slightly stable and then decreased;

    (3) Red blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit continued to decrease, reticulocyte count continued to increase;

    (4) In the case of sufficient fluid replacement and urine volume, blood urea nitrogen continued or increased again.

Secondary outcomes

  1. surgery due to rebleeding

    Time frame: Within 30 days after endoscopic hemostasis

    Surgical treatment for rebleeding

  2. Mortality

    Time frame: Within 30 days after endoscopic hemostasis

    Mortality due to rebleeding

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Endoscopic Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis of Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
May 20, 2021
Registry last updated
May 20, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.