Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02340065

Endocuff-assisted vs. Standard Colonoscopy

The aim of this study is to evaluate Endocuff- assisted colonoscopy in terms of its possible additive contribution in the detection of important lesions, namely polyps and cancers, compared to standard colonoscopy, in a series of patients undergoing back-to-back screening or surveillance colonoscopies in a randomized fashion. Moreover, we aim to assess possible changes regarding post-polypectomy surveillance programs following Endocuff utilization.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine and Research Institute, Attikon University General Hospital

Haidari, Attica, 12462, Greece

About this study

Tandem colonoscopies studies results, show that novel endoscopic technologies detect about 20% more adenomas than those conventional colonoscopy does (missed adenomas). Since Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy cannot be considered as a perfect examination, we hypothesize that conventional colonoscopy will detect one third of the missed adenomas that Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy detects in a similar setting. Therefore a sample size of 120 adenomas achieves 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 3.0 using a two-sided McNemar test with a significance level of 0.05. The odds ratio is equivalent to a difference between two paired proportions of 14% which occurs when the proportion of detected missed adenomas during Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is 21% and the proportion of missed adenomas during conventional colonoscopy is 7%. During one year period before the study initiation, our colonoscopy performance quality data show that we detect a mean number of adenomas per patient equal of 0.7 in a population similar to the one recruited in our study. Therefore, 172 patients overall will be required to detect 120 adenomas. Given the uncertainty of our estimation and in order to cope with patients exclusions, withdrawals and unexpected incomplete colonoscopies, we decided to recruit 200 patients.

A more extensive description regarding the investigators study is provided in the following fields.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adults undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy
  • symptomatic adults with indication for colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

  • age<18 and > 80 years
  • poor overall health (ASA III, IV)
  • recent abdominal surgery
  • presence of abdominal wall hernias
  • active colitis
  • previous bowel resection
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • polyposis syndromes

Treatment and study plan

Standard colonoscopy

Procedure

examination of the colon with a conventional colonoscope

Other names: conventional colonoscopy

Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy

Procedure

examination of the colon with Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy

Other names: Endocuff

Primary outcomes

  1. number and rate of missed adenomas

    Time frame: one week

    in the entire colon

Secondary outcomes

  1. number of adenomas and adenoma detection rate in the entire colon

    Time frame: one week

    with both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy

  2. number of adenomas and adenoma detection rate in the right colon

    Time frame: one week

    with both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy

  3. number of polyps and polyp detection rate in the entire colon

    Time frame: one week

    with both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy

  4. number of polyps and polyp detection rate in the right colon

    Time frame: one week

    with both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy

  5. colonoscopy completion (colonoscopy completion rate, reason for incomplete colonoscopy)

    Time frame: one week

    colonoscopy completion rate, reason for incomplete colonoscopy

  6. intubation and withdrawal time

    Time frame: one week

    for both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy (time spent for therapeutic procedures is excluded)

  7. adverse events

    Time frame: one week

    adverse event rate

  8. endoscopist's satisfaction (quantified using a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied)

    Time frame: one week

    endoscopist's satisfaction quantified using a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) for Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy

  9. mean number of adenomas per procedure

    Time frame: one week

    with both Endocuff-assisted and standard colonoscopy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Attikon Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Endocuff-assisted vs. Standard Colonoscopy: a Randomized, Back-to-Back Study

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jan 16, 2015
Registry last updated
Jul 14, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.